Disentangling climate change effects on species interactions: effects of temperature, phenological shifts, and body size

Oecologia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 173 (3) ◽  
pp. 1043-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker H. W. Rudolf ◽  
Manasvini Singh
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Thomas Lee Anderson

The influence of biotic and abiotic factors on species interactions and overall community structure has long interested ecologists. Despite a legacy of interest, there is still ambiguity into the role of biotic and abiotic factors due to highly nuanced, complex networks of interactions that are difficult to comprehend. Yet, understanding how such nuances is an essential goal to determine how they affect population and community structure. Thus, the goal of my dissertation was to understand how multiple biotic and abiotic mechanisms alter interactions among larval stages of two pond-breeding salamanders. Larval stages of pond-breeding salamanders represent an excellent system for understanding how species interactions vary along abiotic and biotic gradients. Intra-and interspecific interactions are frequently determined by size differences among individuals, where larger larvae are predators of smaller larvae and can out-compete them for shared resources. However, when size differences are minimized, only competition occurs. Such conjoined competition and predation is termed intraguild predation, and is a common interaction in many taxa. The factors that determine size differences among individuals (both within and between species) are critical towards to determining both the type of interaction, as well as the strength of such interactions. The focal species I used were the ringed salamander (Ambystoma annulatum) and spotted salamander (A. maculatum). The former breeds earlier than the latter, creating a larval size advantage which results in predation as the dominant interaction between species. However, factors that influence growth rates of ringed salamanders could result in minimized size differences, resulting in a change to the strength or type of interaction that occurs. For my dissertation, I experimentally investigated three different processes that were expected to affect the relative importance of predation and competition: density dependence, food web structure, and phenological shifts. In my first chapter, I tested whether the density of ringed salamanders influenced their growth rates to such a degree that the interaction type with spotted salamanders would switch from predation to competition. I found that increased intraspecific competition in ringed salamanders reduced their body size and increased their larval period length. However, intraspecific competition did not reduce their size to such a degree that predation on spotted salamanders was precluded. Spotted salamanders showed decreased survival and increased size at higher predator densities, indicative of thinning effects. The period of overlap in ponds also increased at higher predator densities, resulting in a larger temporal window for interactions to occur. In my second chapter, I tested how six different top predator food webs would influence intraguild predation between ringed and spotted salamanders. I also tested whether food web configuration would be simultaneously impacted by increased habitat complexity. I found that ringed salamander body size and survival were unaffected by habitat complexity, and that only certain combinations of predators affected these demographic rates. Spotted salamander body size and survival showed positive and negative relationships with ringed salamander survival, but the strength of these relationships varied depending on the predator and habitat complexity treatment. Thus, pairwise interactions may not exemplify typical interactions when embedded in more complex food webs with other predators. For my third chapter, I investigated whether phenological shifts in both the ringed and spotted salamanders, simultaneous to density dependence in the ringed salamander would influence the type and strength of their interactions. I found ringed salamander survival varied with phenological shifts but only when at high intraspecific densities. Spotted salamanders were relatively unaffected by phenological shifts, and that their interactions were, similar to the previous chapters, influenced primarily by survival of ringed salamanders. As phenological shifts are predicted for many species with climate change, this study highlights that not all species interactions will be subsequently affected, and that other underlying factors (e.g. density dependence) may be more important. Thus, the most important findings of my dissertation include 1) predator density can be a dominant factor in species interactions, 2) pairwise interactions may change when embedded in different habitats or food webs in non-intuitive ways, and 3) simultaneously testing multiple mechanisms can elicit a greater understanding of the relative importance of different ecological processes.


Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Valeria B. Salinas-Ramos ◽  
Paolo Agnelli ◽  
Luciano Bosso ◽  
Leonardo Ancillotto ◽  
Víctor Sánchez-Cordero ◽  
...  

Body size in animals commonly shows geographic and temporal variations that may depend upon several environmental drivers, including climatic conditions, productivity, geography and species interactions. The topic of body size trends across time has gained momentum in recent years since this has been proposed as a third universal response to climate change along with changes in distribution and phenology. However, disentangling the genuine effects of climate change from those of other environmental factors is often far from trivial. In this study, we tested a set of hypotheses concerning body size variation across time and space in Italian populations of a rhinolophid bat, the lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros. We examined forearm length (FAL) and cranial linear traits in a unique historical collection of this species covering years from 1869 to 2016, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the longest time series ever considered in a morphological assessment of a bat species. No temporal changes occurred, rejecting the hypotheses that body size varied in response to climate change or urbanization (light pollution). We found that FAL increased with latitude following a Bergmann’s rule trend, whereas the width of upper incisors, likely a diet-related trait, showed an opposite pattern which awaits explanation. We also confirmed that FAL is sexually dimorphic in this species and ruled out that insularity has any detectable effect on the linear traits we considered. This suggests that positive responses of body size to latitude do not mean per se that concurring temporal responses to climate change are also expected. Further investigations should explore the occurrence of these patterns over larger spatial scales and more species in order to detect the existence of general patterns across time and space.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng-Xing Zou ◽  
Volker H. W. Rudolf

AbstractThe relative arrival time of species often affects species interactions within a community, contributing to priority effects. Recent studies on phenological shifts under climate change have generated renewed interest on priority effects, but their role in shaping long-term dynamics of seasonal communities is poorly resolved. Here we use a general stage-structure competition model to determine how different types of priority effects influence long-term coexistence of species in seasonal systems. We show that while shifts in mean and variance of relative arrival time can alter persistence and coexistence conditions of species, these effects depend on season length and type of priority effect. In “slow” systems with one or a few cohorts per season, changes in mean and seasonal variation of relative arrival time strongly altered species persistence through trait-mediated priority effects. In contrast, competition outcome in “fast” systems is largely determined by numeric priority effects due to interaction between many overlapping generations. These results suggest that empirically observed priority effects may arise from fundamentally different mechanisms, and that fast-generating systems may be less impacted by seasonal variation in phenology. Our model provides important insight into how natural communities respond to increasing variation in phenology over seasons under climate change.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M. Cohen ◽  
Marc J. Lajeunesse ◽  
Jason R. Rohr

Phenology, or the timing of seasonal activities, is shifting with climate change, resulting in disruptions to the timing of migration and breeding and in emerging asynchronies between interacting species1-5. Recent syntheses have concluded that trophic level1, latitude6, and how phenological responses are measured7 are key to determining the strength of phenological responses to climate change. However, despite these insights, researchers still lack a comprehensive framework that can predict responses to climate change globally and across diverse taxa. For example, little is known about whether phenological shifts are driven by different climatic factors across regions or which ecologically important species characteristics (e.g., body size) predict the strength of phenological responses. Here, we address these questions by synthesizing hundreds of published time series of animal phenology from across the planet. We find that temperature drives phenological responses at mid-latitudes, but precipitation is more important at lower latitudes, likely because these climate factors often drive seasonality in each of these regions. Body size is also negatively associated with the strength of phenological shift, suggesting emerging asynchronies between interacting species that differ in size, such as hosts and ectoparasites and predators and prey. Finally, although there are many compelling biological explanations for spring phenological delays, some examples of delays are associated with short annual records prone to sampling error. As climate change intensifies, our findings arm biologists with predictions concerning which climatic variables and organismal traits drive phenological shifts.


2012 ◽  
Vol 367 (1605) ◽  
pp. 2903-2912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Brose ◽  
Jennifer A. Dunne ◽  
Jose M. Montoya ◽  
Owen L. Petchey ◽  
Florian D. Schneider ◽  
...  

One important aspect of climate change is the increase in average temperature, which will not only have direct physiological effects on all species but also indirectly modifies abundances, interaction strengths, food-web topologies, community stability and functioning. In this theme issue, we highlight a novel pathway through which warming indirectly affects ecological communities: by changing their size structure (i.e. the body-size distributions). Warming can shift these distributions towards dominance of small- over large-bodied species. The conceptual, theoretical and empirical research described in this issue, in sum, suggests that effects of temperature may be dominated by changes in size structure, with relatively weak direct effects. For example, temperature effects via size structure have implications for top-down and bottom-up control in ecosystems and may ultimately yield novel communities. Moreover, scaling up effects of temperature and body size from physiology to the levels of populations, communities and ecosystems may provide a crucially important mechanistic approach for forecasting future consequences of global warming.


2015 ◽  
Vol 282 (1812) ◽  
pp. 20151211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Alofs ◽  
Donald A. Jackson

Climate change threatens species directly through environmental changes and indirectly through its effects on species interactions. We need tools to predict which species are most vulnerable to these threats. Pairwise species associations and body size are simple but promising predictors of the relative impact of species introduced outside of their historical ranges. We examined the vulnerability of 30 fish species to the impacts of three centrarchid predators that are being introduced to lakes north of their historical range boundaries. Species that were negatively associated with each centrarchid in their historical range were more likely to be lost from lakes with centrarchid introductions. Total body length was most important in predicting impact for the most gape-limited predator. At the regional scale, our method identifies those species most vulnerable to introductions facilitated by climate change and can easily be applied to a range of taxa undergoing range expansions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Yin ◽  
Julia Siebert ◽  
Nico Eisenhauer ◽  
Martin Schädler

AbstractGlobal change drivers, such as climate and land use, may profoundly influence body size, density, and biomass of organisms. It is still poorly understood how these concurrent drivers interact in affecting ecological communities. We present results of an experimental field study assessing the interactive effects of climate change and land-use intensification on body size, density, and biomass of soil microarthropods. We found that both climate change and intensive land use decreased their total biomass. Strikingly, this reduction was realized via two dissimilar pathways: climate change reduced mean body size, while intensive land use decreased population size. These findings highlight that two of the most pervasive global change drivers operate via different pathways when decreasing soil animal biomass. These shifts in soil communities may threaten essential ecosystem functions like organic matter turnover and nutrient cycling in future ecosystems.SignificanceMany important ecosystem functions are determined by the biomass of soil animal, however, how their biomass may respond to climate change and land-use intensification still remains unknown. We conducted a large field study to investigate the potential interaction between these two pervasive global change drivers, and disentangle the pathways where they contribute to the changes in soil animal biomass. Our findings are exceptionally novel by showing detrimental, but largely independent, effects of climate change and land-use intensity on soil animal biomass, and that these independent effects can be explained by two dissimilar pathways: climate change reduced mean body size, while intensive land use decreased population size. Notably, consistent climate change effects under different land-use regimes suggest that (1) the identified pathways may apply to a wide range of environmental conditions, and (2) current extensive land-use regimes do not mitigate detrimental climate change effects on ecosystems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document