Elective antireflux surgery in the US: an analysis of national trends in utilization and inpatient outcomes from 2005 to 2010

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1712-1719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke M. Funk ◽  
Aliyah Kanji ◽  
W. Scott Melvin ◽  
Kyle A. Perry
Keyword(s):  
Antireflux Surgery ◽  
Inpatient Outcomes ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends

scholarly journals Caring for Older Patients With Cancer: Estimates of the Prevalence, Burden, and Unmet Needs of Caregivers in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 690-690
Author(s):  
Erin Kent
Keyword(s):  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
The United States ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Behavioral Risk ◽  
Ripple Effect ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends

Abstract In 2020, ~1.8 million Americans are expected to be newly diagnosed with cancer, with approximately 70% of cases diagnosed over the age of 65. Cancer can have a ripple effect, impacting not just patients themselves, but their family caregivers. This presentation will provide an overview of the estimates of the number of family caregivers caring for individuals with cancer in the US, focusing on older patients, from several population-based data sources: Caregiving in the US 2020, the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS, 2017-2019), the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS, 2015-2019), and the National Health and Aging Trends (NHATS) Survey. The presentation will compare features of the data sources to give a comprehensive picture of the state of cancer caregiving. In addition, the presentation will highlight what is known about the experiences of cancer caregivers, including caregiving characteristics, burden, unmet needs, and ideas for improving support for family caregivers.

Digital Health Engagement in the US Population: Insights From the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e4
Author(s):  
Chelsea L. Ratcliff ◽  
Melinda Krakow ◽  
Alexandra Greenberg-Worisek ◽  
Bradford W. Hesse
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Smart Device ◽  
P Value ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends

Objectives. To examine prevalence and predictors of digital health engagement among the US population. Methods. We analyzed nationally representative cross-sectional data on 7 digital health engagement behaviors, as well as demographic and socioeconomic predictors, from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, cycle 2, collected in 2018; n = 2698–3504). We fitted multivariable logistic regression models using weighted survey responses to generate population estimates. Results. Digitally seeking health information (70.14%) was relatively common, whereas using health apps (39.53%) and using a digital device to track health metrics (35.37%) or health goal progress (38.99%) were less common. Digitally communicating with one’s health care providers (35.58%) was moderate, whereas sharing health data with providers (17.20%) and sharing health information on social media (14.02%) were uncommon. Being female, younger than 65 years, a college graduate, and a smart device owner positively predicted several digital health engagement behaviors (odds ratio range = 0.09–4.21; P value range < .001–.03). Conclusions. Many public health goals depend on a digitally engaged populace. These data highlight potential barriers to 7 key digital engagement behaviors that could be targeted for intervention. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print May 20, 2021: e1–e4. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306282 )

National trends in cholecystectomies in the US: a 15-year comparison of two surgical approaches

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussein H. Khachfe ◽  
Mohamad A. Chahrour ◽  
Mohamad Y. Fares ◽  
Hamza A. Salhab ◽  
Faek R. Jamali
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends

Abstract 15772: Cardiovascular Hospitalizations and Procedures Plummet Nationwide During Covid-19 - an Analysis of US Medical Claims

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica R Shah ◽  
Tanya F Partridge ◽  
Xiaoqing Xue ◽  
Justin L Gregg
Keyword(s):  
Claims Data ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
National Level ◽  
Regional Studies ◽  
Bayesian Hierarchical ◽  
Medical Claims ◽  
Equivalent Time ◽  
Time Period ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends

Introduction: Regional studies have reported a decline in cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations and procedures with the onset of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Factors may include patient reluctance to seek care and de-prioritization of approvals for CV admissions by hospitals. We wanted to assess these observations at a national level. Hypothesis: To examine national trends in CV hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), unstable angina (USA), and heart failure (HF), as well as left heart catheterizations (LHC), using US medical claims data. Methods: We interrogated IQVIA US Claims data, a verified source, from Jan 2019 to May 2020 (214 million patients; 76% private insurance claims, 19% Medicare claims, 5% Medicaid claims). Since confirmed COVID-19 cases in the US began rising in Mar 2020, this was used as reference point to identify cohorts for comparison. Trends in volumes of hospitalizations for key CV events (AMI, USA, and HF) and LHC were compared from Mar 1 to May 8, 2020 to the equivalent time period in 2019. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to assess trends. Results: From Mar to May 2020, compared to 2019, there were significantly fewer hospitalizations for: key CV events (1,110,492 vs. 1,487,558; p=0.0016); AMI (277,615 vs. 412,235; p=0.0002); USA (1,007 vs. 1,688, p=0.1245); and, HF (831,870 vs. 1,073,635; p=0.0036). There were significantly fewer LHC (118,393 vs. 221,701; p=0.0002). As shown in the Figure, there was a significant decline in CV hospitalizations in 2020 compared to 2019. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, CV hospitalizations have declined significantly in the US. We observed an ~25% drop in CV hospitalizations and an ~50% drop in LHC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national evaluation of trends in CV care during COVID-19 and validate concerns that acute CV care in the US has been delayed or deferred, potentially foreshadowing a surge of CV complications in the future.

scholarly journals 3095 Perceived Knowledge of Palliative Care among Immigrants: A Secondary Data Analysis from the Health Information National Trends Survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 136-137
Author(s):  
Amelia Barwise ◽  
Andrea Cheville ◽  
Mark Wieland ◽  
Ognjen Gajic ◽  
Alexandra Greenberg-Worisek
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Sociodemographic Characteristics ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Knowledge ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends ◽  
Source Of Information

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Immigrants to North America receive more interventions at end of life.The reasons for this are not entirely clear but may potentially be due to knowledge gaps. The primary objective of this study was to measure and describe levels of perceived knowledge about palliative care among immigrants to the US compared to those born in the US. Our secondary objective was to identify trusted sources for seeking information about palliative care among immigrants and compare these trusted sources with those born in the US. We hypothesized that immigrants would have less knowledge of palliative care than those born in US and would trust different sources for information about palliative care. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We analyzed data from the nationally representative 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, cycle 2). Questionnaires were administered via mail between January and May 2018 to a population-based sample of adults. The primary outcome of interest was assessed using the item “How would you describe your level of knowledge about palliative care?” The secondary outcome of interest was determined using the item “Imagine you had a strong need to get information about palliative care, which of the following would you most trust as a source of information about palliative care?” All analyses were complete case analyses and conducted with survey commands using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated, and bivariate analyses run between the outcomes of interest and sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, nativity, English language proficiency). Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to assess the role of nativity, controlling for statistically significant and relevant sociodemographic variables. Jackknife weighting was used to generate population-level estimates. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The response rate was 33% (n=3384) and included 2846 (85.3% weighted) born in the US and 492 (14.7% weighted) not born in the USA. About 70% of those born in the US and 77% of immigrants (weighted) responded that they had “never heard of palliative care.” Trusted sources of palliative care were very similar between the groups (all p > 0.05). Both groups’ preferred trusted source of palliative care knowledge was “health care provider,” with over 80% of respondents in each group selecting this option. Printed materials and social media were the least popular trusted sources among both groups. After adjusting for relevant sociodemographic characteristics, we found no association between poor knowledge of palliative care and nativity (p=0.22). Female respondents had 2.5-fold increased odds of reporting low levels of perceived knowledge of palliative care (OR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.76-3.78; p<0.001). Education was an important predictor of perceived knowledge of palliative care; as education level increased, so did perceived knowledge of palliative care (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Perceived knowledge of palliative care is poor generally, regardless of birthplace. Trusted sources for palliative care are similar between immigrants and those born in the US. Education is important and is a strong predictor of perceived knowledge of palliative care. Women perceive they have lower levels of knowledge of PC than men. Differences in end of life care between immigrants and non-immigrants cannot be explained by knowledge differences. Further research is needed to examine the potential factors including suboptimal communication between providers and immigrant patients to understand why these differences are noted. Future strategies for improving knowledge of palliative care should target health care providers as the key trusted source of information to help address deficits noted in this study.

scholarly journals Widespread Belief That Organic and Additive-Free Tobacco Products are Less Harmful Than Regular Tobacco Products: Results From the 2017 US Health Information National Trends Survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 970-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Pearson ◽  
Meghan Moran ◽  
Cristine D Delnevo ◽  
Andrea C Villanti ◽  
M Jane Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Health Information ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Tobacco Product ◽  
Tobacco Products ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
The Us ◽  
Widespread Belief ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Never Smokers ◽  
National Trends

Abstract Significance US smokers of Natural American Spirit, a brand marketed as “organic” and “additive-free,” are more likely than other cigarette smokers to believe that their brand might be less harmful than other brands. This article (1) describes the prevalence of belief that “organic” and “additive-free” tobacco is less harmful than regular tobacco products in the US population and (2) describes the sociodemographic characteristics of adults who believe tobacco products with these descriptors are less harmful. Methods Data were drawn from the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey of US adults. Logistic regression models were used to examine correlates of the belief that “organic” or “additive-free” tobacco products are less harmful than regular tobacco products. Results Overall, 26.7% of US adults and 45.3% of adult smokers believe that “organic” tobacco products are less harmful than regular tobacco products. Similarly, 35.2% of US adults and 47.1% of smokers believe that “additive-free” tobacco products are less harmful. When examining gender, age, education, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and smoking status, only age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] ~0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97, 0.99 for both outcomes) and smoking status (current vs. never smokers, aOR ~1.78, 95% CI 1.03, 3.07 for both outcomes) were correlates of believing that “organic” or “additive-free” tobacco is less harmful than regular tobacco products. Conclusions Belief that “organic” and “additive-free” tobacco products are less harmful than other products is widespread. Younger adults and current smokers are most likely to be misinformed by “organic” or “additive-free” tobacco product descriptors. Implications Belief that “organic” and “additive-free” tobacco products are less harmful than other products is widespread among US adults and most prevalent among smokers. Removal of terms that incorrectly imply reduced harm may correct current and future consumers’ misperceptions about the brand.

National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.R.G. Finlayson ◽  
W.S. Laycock ◽  
J.D. Birkmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Antireflux Surgery ◽  
National Trends

scholarly journals Use of Wearable Device among Adults in the US with Self-reported Diabetes Mellitus: An Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
Victor Kekere ◽  
Henry Onyeaka ◽  
Olubunmi Fatoki ◽  
Kudirat Olatunde ◽  
Somto Enemuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Wearable Device ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends

scholarly journals The COVID States Project #26: Trajectory of COVID-19-related behaviors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lazer ◽  
Mauricio Santillana ◽  
Roy H. Perlis ◽  
Alexi Quintana ◽  
Katherine Ognyanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
State Level ◽  
The United States ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Upper Midwest ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Current State ◽  
Change Behavior ◽  
Current Prevalence ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Trends

The current state of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States is dire, with circumstances in the Upper Midwest particularly grim. In contrast, multiple countries around the world have shown that temporary changes in human behavior and consistent precautions, such as effective testing, contact tracing, and isolation, can slow transmission of COVID-19, allowing local economies to remain open and societal activities to approach normalcy as of today. These include island countries such as New Zealand, Taiwan, Iceland and Australia, and continental countries such as Norway, Uruguay, Thailand, Finland, and South Korea. These successes demonstrate that coordinated action to change behavior can control the pandemic. In this report, we evaluate how the human behaviors that have been shown to inhibit the spread of COVID-19 have evolved across the US since April, 2020.Our report is based on surveys that the COVID States Project has been conducting approximately every month since April in all 50 US states plus the District of Columbia. We address four primary questions:1) What are the national trends in social distancing behaviors and mask wearing since April?2) What are the trends among particular population subsets?3) What are the trends across individual states plus DC?4) What is the relationship, at the state level, between social distancing behaviors and mask wearing with the current prevalence of COVID-19?

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document