scholarly journals Return-to-work outcomes in cancer survivors

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 3005-3006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Crevenna
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Work Outcomes

scholarly journals A randomised feasibility trial of an employer-based intervention for enhancing successful return to work of cancer survivors (MiLES intervention)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Greidanus ◽  
A. E. de Rijk ◽  
A. G. E. M. de Boer ◽  
M. E. M. M. Bos ◽  
P. W. Plaisier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Secondary Effect ◽  
Quality Of Working Life ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background Employers express a need for support during sickness absence and return to work (RTW) of cancer survivors. Therefore, a web-based intervention (MiLES) targeted at employers with the objective of enhancing cancer survivors’ successful RTW has been developed. This study aimed to assess feasibility of a future definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) on the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention. Also preliminary results on the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention were obtained. Methods A randomised feasibility trial of 6 months was undertaken with cancer survivors aged 18–63 years, diagnosed with cancer < 2 years earlier, currently in paid employment, and sick-listed < 1 year. Participants were randomised to an intervention group, with their employer receiving the MiLES intervention, or to a waiting-list control group (2:1). Feasibility of a future definitive RCT was determined on the basis of predefined criteria related to method and protocol-related uncertainties (e.g. reach, retention, appropriateness). The primary effect measure (i.e. successful RTW) and secondary effect measures (e.g. quality of working life) were assessed at baseline and 3 and 6 months thereafter. Results Thirty-five cancer survivors were included via medical specialists (4% of the initially invited group) and open invitations, and thereafter randomised to the intervention (n = 24) or control group (n = 11). Most participants were female (97%) with breast cancer (80%) and a permanent employment contract (94%). All predefined criteria for feasibility of a future definitive RCT were achieved, except that concerning the study’s reach (90 participants). After 6 months, 92% of the intervention group and 100% of the control group returned to work (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81–1.03); no difference were found with regard to secondary effect measures. Conclusions With the current design a future definitive RCT on the effectiveness of the MiLES intervention on successful RTW of cancer survivors is not feasible, since recruitment of survivors fell short of the predefined minimum for feasibility. There was selection bias towards survivors at low risk of adverse work outcomes, which reduced generalisability of the outcomes. An alternative study design is needed to study effectiveness of the MiLES intervention. Trial registration The study has been registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NL6758/NTR7627).

scholarly journals Investigating how cancer-related symptoms influence work outcomes among cancer survivors: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia Jie Tan ◽  
Samantha Yin Ching Yip ◽  
Raymond Javan Chan ◽  
Lita Chew ◽  
Alexandre Chan
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Work Ability ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Work Status ◽  
Employment Rates ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Body Image Issues

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how different cancer-related symptoms influence work outcomes among cancer survivors. Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus to identify studies published between 1st January 1999 and 30th October 2020 that investigated the impact of specific cancer-related symptoms on work outcomes among cancer survivors who have completed primary antineoplastic treatment. Study findings were extracted and grouped by symptoms and work outcomes, allowing comparison of associations between these outcomes. Results Seventy-three articles representing 68 studies were eligible for inclusion. From these studies, 27 cancer-related symptoms, 9 work outcomes, and 68 unique associations between specific symptoms and work outcomes were identified. Work status (return to work and employment rates) was most commonly studied, and symptom burden was mainly measured from the patient’s perspective. Higher symptom burden was generally associated with trends of poorer work outcomes. Significant associations were reported in most studies evaluating body image issues and work status, oral dysfunction and work status, fatigue and work ability, and depression and work ability. Conclusion Several cancer-related symptoms were consistently associated with inferior work outcomes among cancer survivors. Body image issues and oral dysfunction were shown to be associated with poorer employment rates, while fatigue and depression were linked to lower levels of work performance. Implications for Cancer Survivors Failure to return to work and decreased productivity post-cancer treatment can have negative consequences for cancer survivors and society at large. Findings from this review will guide the development of work rehabilitation programs for cancer survivors. Protocol registration PROSPERO identifier CRD42020187754

scholarly journals Return to Work of Cancer Survivors Over Five Years after Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 163 (suppl_11) ◽  
pp. S93-S93
Author(s):  
V Arndt ◽  
C Stegmaier ◽  
H Ziegler ◽  
H Brenner
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study

Return to work outcomes for workers with mental health conditions: A retrospective cohort study

Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khic-Houy Prang ◽  
Megan Bohensky ◽  
Peter Smith ◽  
Alex Collie
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

scholarly journals Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action—rapid review and expert consultation

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Régine Kiasuwa Mbengi ◽  
Renée Otter ◽  
Katrien Mortelmans ◽  
Marc Arbyn ◽  
Herman Van Oyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Expert Consultation ◽  
Barriers And Opportunities

Return to Work After Primary Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652097542
Author(s):  
Eric D. Haunschild ◽  
Ron Gilat ◽  
Ophelie Lavoie-Gagne ◽  
Michael C. Fu ◽  
Tracy Tauro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Work Intensity ◽  
Rates Of Return ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Rotator cuff tears are a prevalent pathology in injured workers, causing significant economic ramifications and time away from work. To date, published articles on work outcomes after rotator cuff repair have not been cumulatively assessed and analyzed. Purpose: To systematically review reports on return to work after rotator cuff repair and perform a meta-analysis on factors associated with improved work outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of return-to-work investigations was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Individual studies reporting rates of return to previous work with level of evidence 1 to 4 were independently screened by 2 authors for inclusion, and study quality was assessed using the Methodologic Index for Non-randomized Studies and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Work outcome data were synthesized and analyzed using random effects modeling to identify differences in rates of return to previous work as a function of operative technique, work intensity, and workers’ compensation status. Results: Thirteen retrospective investigations comprising 1224 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair met inclusion criteria for this investigation. Across all investigations, a weighted average of 62.3% of patients returned to previous level of work at 8.15 ± 2.7 months (mean ± SD) after surgery. Based on random effects modeling, higher rates of return to previous work were identified with decreasing work intensity ( P < .001), while rates were similar between open and arthroscopic repair technique ( P = .418) and between workers’ compensation and non–workers’ compensation cohorts ( P = .089). All shoulder pain and functional outcome assessments demonstrated significant improvements at final follow-up when compared with baseline across all investigations. Conclusion: The majority of injured workers undergoing rotator cuff repair return to previous work at approximately 8 months after surgery. Despite this, >35% of patients are unable to return to their previous work level after their repair procedure. Similar rates of return to work can be anticipated regardless of workers’ compensation status and operative technique, while patients in occupations with higher physical intensity experience inferior work outcomes.

Vocational rehabilitation factors associated with successful return to work outcomes for clients with Parkinson’s disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cahit Kaya ◽  
Mykal Leslie ◽  
Bradley McDaniels ◽  
Sergio Cuevas ◽  
Hu Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Vocational Rehabilitation ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Factors Associated

scholarly journals How can social insurers promote return to work in occupational rehabilitation? A quantitative, cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarna Pasanen ◽  
Arto Luoma
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Customer Orientation ◽  
Occupational Rehabilitation ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Work Outcomes ◽  
Pension Insurance ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Process Flow ◽  
The Disabled

Abstract Background Earlier studies indicate a correlation between disability claims experience and return to work outcomes. Thus, the insurer’s role and actions may affect the self-rated health of the disabled worker and the outcomes of occupational rehabilitation. This study diversifies the existing empirical evidence on the role of the insurer in the rehabilitation process and reveals the critical actions that best promote success. Materials and methods Explorative factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), followed by binary regression, were used to analyse survey data of disabled workers (n = 661) who had undergone an occupational rehabilitation within an earnings-related pension insurance system in Finland. Results The claimant’s perceptions of the insurer’s (1) high-quality informing and guidance, (2) customer orientation, (3) smooth process flow and (4) positive service attitude had substantial and statistically significant effects on the success of occupational rehabilitation after adjusting for all likely confounding variables. Conclusions The insurer’s actions are significant predictors of the outcome of occupational rehabilitation. The insurer can promote the health of rehabilitees most effectively by ensuring a smooth process flow and adopting a customer-oriented approach.

scholarly journals Return to work in European Cancer survivors: a systematic review

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 2983-2994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Paltrinieri ◽  
Stefania Fugazzaro ◽  
Lucia Bertozzi ◽  
Maria Chiara Bassi ◽  
Martina Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
European Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document