scholarly journals Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery

Author(s):  
Anna L. Roethe ◽  
Judith Rösler ◽  
Martin Misch ◽  
Peter Vajkoczy ◽  
Thomas Picht

Abstract Background Augmented reality (AR) has the potential to support complex neurosurgical interventions by including visual information seamlessly. This study examines intraoperative visualization parameters and clinical impact of AR in brain tumor surgery. Methods Fifty-five intracranial lesions, operated either with AR-navigated microscope (n = 39) or conventional neuronavigation (n = 16) after randomization, have been included prospectively. Surgical resection time, duration/type/mode of AR, displayed objects (n, type), pointer-based navigation checks (n), usability of control, quality indicators, and overall surgical usefulness of AR have been assessed. Results AR display has been used in 44.4% of resection time. Predominant AR type was navigation view (75.7%), followed by target volumes (20.1%). Predominant AR mode was picture-in-picture (PiP) (72.5%), followed by 23.3% overlay display. In 43.6% of cases, vision of important anatomical structures has been partially or entirely blocked by AR information. A total of 7.7% of cases used MRI navigation only, 30.8% used one, 23.1% used two, and 38.5% used three or more object segmentations in AR navigation. A total of 66.7% of surgeons found AR visualization helpful in the individual surgical case. AR depth information and accuracy have been rated acceptable (median 3.0 vs. median 5.0 in conventional neuronavigation). The mean utilization of the navigation pointer was 2.6 × /resection hour (AR) vs. 9.7 × /resection hour (neuronavigation); navigation effort was significantly reduced in AR (P < 0.001). Conclusions The main benefit of HUD-based AR visualization in brain tumor surgery is the integrated continuous display allowing for pointer-less navigation. Navigation view (PiP) provides the highest usability while blocking the operative field less frequently. Visualization quality will benefit from improvements in registration accuracy and depth impression. German clinical trials registration number. DRKS00016955.

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii43-iii44 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Maruyama ◽  
E. Watanabe ◽  
K. Saito ◽  
K. Sato ◽  
H. Yoshida ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 305-314
Author(s):  
Makoto Satoh ◽  
Takeshi Nakajima ◽  
Takashi Yamaguchi ◽  
Eiju Watanabe ◽  
Kensuke Kawai

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.H.B. van Niftrik ◽  
F. van der Wouden ◽  
V. Staartjes ◽  
J. Fierstra ◽  
M. Stienen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estela Val Jordan ◽  
Agustín Nebra Puertas ◽  
Juan Casado Pellejero ◽  
Maria Dolores Vicente Gordo ◽  
Concepción Revilla López ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gennadiy A. Katsevman ◽  
Walter Greenleaf ◽  
Ricardo García-García ◽  
Maria Victoria Perea ◽  
Valentina Ladera ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. ii2-ii2
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Abe

Abstract It is reported that the development of new perioperative motor deficits was associated with decreased overall survival despite similar extent of resection and adjuvant therapy. The maximum safe resection without any neurological deficits is required to improve overall survival in patients with brain tumor. Surgery is performed with various modalities, such as neuro-monitoring, photodynamic diagnosis, neuro-navigation, awake craniotomy, intraoperative MRI, and so on. Above all, awake craniotomy technique is now the standard procedure to achieve the maximum safe resection in patients with brain tumor. It is well known that before any treatment, gliomas generate globally (and not only focally) altered functional connectomics profiles, with various patterns of neural reorganization allowing different levels of cognitive compensation. Therefore, perioperative cortical mapping and elucidation of functional network, neuroplasticity and reorganization are important for brain tumor surgery. On the other hand, recent studies have proposed several gene signatures as biomarkers for different grades of gliomas from various perspectives. Then, we aimed to identify these biomarkers in pre-operative and/or intra-operative periods, using liquid biopsy, immunostaining and various PCR methods including rapid genotyping assay. In this presentation, we would like to demonstrate our surgical strategy based on molecular and functional connectomics profiles.


2021 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 106420
Author(s):  
Mayla Santana Correia ◽  
Iuri Santana Neville ◽  
Cesar Cimonari de Almeida ◽  
Cintya Yukie Hayashi ◽  
Luana Talita Diniz Ferreira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document