scholarly journals Augmented reality in brain tumor surgery using the microscope focal point as the virtual pointer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Ammirati
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Focal Point ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery

scholarly journals P04.17 Novel augmented reality-based neuronavigation using smart glasses and clinical application to brain tumor surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii43-iii44 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Maruyama ◽  
E. Watanabe ◽  
K. Saito ◽  
K. Sato ◽  
H. Yoshida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Clinical Application ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery ◽  
Smart Glasses

scholarly journals Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L. Roethe ◽  
Judith Rösler ◽  
Martin Misch ◽  
Peter Vajkoczy ◽  
Thomas Picht
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Depth Information ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery ◽  
Registration Accuracy ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Controlled Evaluation ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Augmented reality (AR) has the potential to support complex neurosurgical interventions by including visual information seamlessly. This study examines intraoperative visualization parameters and clinical impact of AR in brain tumor surgery. Methods Fifty-five intracranial lesions, operated either with AR-navigated microscope (n = 39) or conventional neuronavigation (n = 16) after randomization, have been included prospectively. Surgical resection time, duration/type/mode of AR, displayed objects (n, type), pointer-based navigation checks (n), usability of control, quality indicators, and overall surgical usefulness of AR have been assessed. Results AR display has been used in 44.4% of resection time. Predominant AR type was navigation view (75.7%), followed by target volumes (20.1%). Predominant AR mode was picture-in-picture (PiP) (72.5%), followed by 23.3% overlay display. In 43.6% of cases, vision of important anatomical structures has been partially or entirely blocked by AR information. A total of 7.7% of cases used MRI navigation only, 30.8% used one, 23.1% used two, and 38.5% used three or more object segmentations in AR navigation. A total of 66.7% of surgeons found AR visualization helpful in the individual surgical case. AR depth information and accuracy have been rated acceptable (median 3.0 vs. median 5.0 in conventional neuronavigation). The mean utilization of the navigation pointer was 2.6 × /resection hour (AR) vs. 9.7 × /resection hour (neuronavigation); navigation effort was significantly reduced in AR (P < 0.001). Conclusions The main benefit of HUD-based AR visualization in brain tumor surgery is the integrated continuous display allowing for pointer-less navigation. Navigation view (PiP) provides the highest usability while blocking the operative field less frequently. Visualization quality will benefit from improvements in registration accuracy and depth impression. German clinical trials registration number. DRKS00016955.

Evaluation of augmented-reality based navigation for brain tumor surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 305-314
Author(s):  
Makoto Satoh ◽  
Takeshi Nakajima ◽  
Takashi Yamaguchi ◽  
Eiju Watanabe ◽  
Kensuke Kawai
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery

Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Early Complications after Brain Tumor Surgery

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.H.B. van Niftrik ◽  
F. van der Wouden ◽  
V. Staartjes ◽  
J. Fierstra ◽  
M. Stienen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithm ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Early Complications ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery

Role of Perioperative Factor XIII in Intracerebral Hemorrhage after Brain Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estela Val Jordan ◽  
Agustín Nebra Puertas ◽  
Juan Casado Pellejero ◽  
Maria Dolores Vicente Gordo ◽  
Concepción Revilla López ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Factor Xiii ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery ◽  
A Prospective Study

Virtual Reality during Brain Mapping for Awake-Patient Brain Tumor Surgery: Proposed Tasks and Domains to Test

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennadiy A. Katsevman ◽  
Walter Greenleaf ◽  
Ricardo García-García ◽  
Maria Victoria Perea ◽  
Valentina Ladera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Brain Mapping ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Awake Patient ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery

scholarly journals MS-1 Surgical strategy for brain tumor based on molecular and functional connectomics profiles

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. ii2-ii2
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Abe
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Awake Craniotomy ◽  
Surgical Strategy ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Cortical Mapping ◽  
Photodynamic Diagnosis ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery

Abstract It is reported that the development of new perioperative motor deficits was associated with decreased overall survival despite similar extent of resection and adjuvant therapy. The maximum safe resection without any neurological deficits is required to improve overall survival in patients with brain tumor. Surgery is performed with various modalities, such as neuro-monitoring, photodynamic diagnosis, neuro-navigation, awake craniotomy, intraoperative MRI, and so on. Above all, awake craniotomy technique is now the standard procedure to achieve the maximum safe resection in patients with brain tumor. It is well known that before any treatment, gliomas generate globally (and not only focally) altered functional connectomics profiles, with various patterns of neural reorganization allowing different levels of cognitive compensation. Therefore, perioperative cortical mapping and elucidation of functional network, neuroplasticity and reorganization are important for brain tumor surgery. On the other hand, recent studies have proposed several gene signatures as biomarkers for different grades of gliomas from various perspectives. Then, we aimed to identify these biomarkers in pre-operative and/or intra-operative periods, using liquid biopsy, immunostaining and various PCR methods including rapid genotyping assay. In this presentation, we would like to demonstrate our surgical strategy based on molecular and functional connectomics profiles.

Clinical outcome assessments of motor status in patients undergoing brain tumor surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 201 ◽  
pp. 106420
Author(s):  
Mayla Santana Correia ◽  
Iuri Santana Neville ◽  
Cesar Cimonari de Almeida ◽  
Cintya Yukie Hayashi ◽  
Luana Talita Diniz Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Brain Tumor Surgery ◽  
Outcome Assessments ◽  
Clinical Outcome Assessments
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document