scholarly journals Six months of high-dose xylitol in high-risk caries subjects—a 2-year randomised, clinical trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 785-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guglielmo Campus ◽  
Maria Grazia Cagetti ◽  
Silvana Sale ◽  
Massimo Petruzzi ◽  
Giuliana Solinas ◽  
...  
Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 374
Author(s):  
Simon Bailey ◽  
Nicolas André ◽  
Lorenza Gandola ◽  
Maura Massimino ◽  
Stefan Rutkowski ◽  
...  

Medulloblastoma patients receive adapted therapies stratified according to their risk-profile. Favourable, standard, and high disease-risk groups are each defined by the status of clinical and pathological risk factors, alongside an evolving repertoire of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Medulloblastoma clinical trials in Europe are coordinated by the International Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP-Europe) brain tumour group. Favourable and standard-risk patients are eligible for the SIOP-PNET5-MB clinical trial protocol. In contrast, therapies for high-risk disease worldwide have, to date, encompassed a range of different treatment philosophies, with no clear consensus on approach. Higher radiotherapy doses are typically deployed, delivered either conventionally or in hyper-fractionated/accelerated regimens. Similarly, both standard and high-dose chemotherapies were assessed. However, trials to date in high-risk medulloblastoma have commonly been institutional or national, based on modest cohort sizes, and have not evaluated the relative performance of different strategies in a randomised fashion. We describe the concepts and design of the SIOP-E high-risk medulloblastoma clinical trial (SIOP-HR-MB), the first international biomarker-driven, randomised, clinical trial for high-risk medulloblastoma. SIOP-HR-MB is programmed to recruit >800 patients in 16 countries across Europe; its primary objectives are to assess the relative efficacies of the alternative established regimens. The HR-MB patient population is molecularly and clinically defined, and upfront assessments incorporate a standardised central review of molecular pathology, radiology, and radiotherapy quality assurance. Secondary objectives include the assessment of (i) novel therapies within an upfront ‘window’ and (ii) therapy-associated neuropsychology, toxicity, and late effects, alongside (iii) the collection of materials for comprehensive integrated studies of biological determinants within the SIOP-HR-MB cohort.


2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Campus ◽  
M.G. Cagetti ◽  
G. Sacco ◽  
G. Solinas ◽  
S. Mastroberardino ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 645-653
Author(s):  
Pieter C. Smits ◽  
Chun Chin Chang ◽  
Bernard Chevalier ◽  
Nick E.J. West ◽  
Tommaso Gori ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11000-11000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Gronchi ◽  
Emanuela Palmerini ◽  
Vittorio Quagliuolo ◽  
Javier Martin Broto ◽  
Antonio Lopez Pousa ◽  
...  

11000 Background: A ISG randomized trial on 5 cycles of adjuvant epirubicin+ifosfamide (EI) versus no chemotherapy suggested an OS benefit in localized high-risk STS (JCO 2001;19:1238). A subsequent trial showed no difference between 3 vs 5 cycles of the same neoadjuvant regimen (JCO 2012;30:850). The aim of this trial was to compare 3 cycles of EI versus a histology-tailored (HT) neoadjuvant regimen in selected localized high-risk STS. Methods: This is a multicenter European randomized trial comparing EI versus a HT regimen: gemcitabine+docetaxel in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS); trabectedin in high-grade myxoid liposarcoma; high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide in synovial sarcoma (SS); etoposide+ifosfamide in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST); gemcitabine+dacarbazine in leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Patients had localized high-risk (grade = 3; size ≥5 cm) STS of extremities or trunk wall. Primary end-point was Disease Free Survival (DFS). The final analysis was planned after the observation of 130 events. This allows an 80% power to detect a significant difference at the 5% 2-sided level, if the true HR is 0.6 in favor of EI, as shown by the interim analysis (Lancet Oncol 2017;18:812-822). Results: From May 2011 to May 2016, 287 patients were randomized (97 = UPS; 65 = myxoid liposarcoma; 70 = SS; 27 = MPNST; 28 = LMS). The median follow-up was 51.75 months for the alive patients (IQ 28.03) The DFS and OS probability at 60 months were 0.48 and 0.55 (HR:1.232; 95%CI: 0.875-1.733; log rank p=0.323) and 0.66 and 0.76 (HR:1.766; 95%CI:1.101-2.831; log rank p=0.018), in the HT and EI arm, respectively. Conclusions: The final analysis shows a non-statistically significant DFS difference in favor of EI over HT chemotherapy with a larger and statistically significant OS difference. The outcome of patients on EI overlapped previous ISG trials. EI should remain the regimen of choice when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used in high-risk localized STS. However this trial cannot be used as a formal proof of efficacy of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy per se. EUDRACT 2010 – 023484 – 17. Funding source: Eurosarc FP7 278472. Clinical trial information: NCT01710176.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 456-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Heebøll ◽  
Martin Kreuzfeldt ◽  
Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit ◽  
Marianne Kjær Poulsen ◽  
Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Shaheen ◽  
S. D. Crockett ◽  
S. D. Bright ◽  
R. D. Madanick ◽  
R. Buckmire ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document