Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1443-1450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung Min Lee ◽  
Chin Youb Chung ◽  
Soon Sun Kwon ◽  
Ki Hyuk Sung ◽  
Seung Yeol Lee ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Kyun Lee ◽  
Chin Youb Chung ◽  
Moon Seok Park ◽  
Kyoung Min Lee ◽  
Kyung-Hoi Koo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne M. Golightly ◽  
Robert F. DeVellis ◽  
Amanda E. Nelson ◽  
Marian T. Hannan ◽  
L. Stefan Lohmander ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949901989014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fang ◽  
Andreas Platz ◽  
Lars Müller ◽  
Thomas Chandy ◽  
Cong-Feng Luo ◽  
...  

Background: The Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcomes Measure (TEFTOM) questionnaire is a self-administered, patient-rated outcome measurement questionnaire designed to measure both ‘expectation’ and ‘outcome’ in orthopaedic trauma patients using two subsets of 10 items. We aimed to validate this instrument in a culturally diverse cohort of patients recruited from Asian and European regions. Methods: A total of 193 adult patients with surgically treated AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association types 43 and 44 ankle malleolar and distal tibia fractures were recruited with 158 followed up till 1 year. Expectations were assessed prior to surgery, at 2 weeks and after 6 months using the trauma expectation factor (TEF) score. Outcomes were evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 and 12 months using the trauma outcome measure (TOM), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) and short form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires. Psychometric properties of TEFTOM were assessed. Results: TEF and TOM demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α > 0.87) and reliability at all time points (intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.90). TOM showed strong correlations ( R 2 ≥ 0.60) with the AAOS foot and ankle score, all FAOS subscales, except ‘symptoms’ and SF-36 physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, social functioning and the physical component summary at 6 and 12 months. Effect sizes for TOM were 2.30 and 0.74 from 2 weeks to 6 months and from 6 months to 12 months, respectively. The baseline patient TEF was predictive for the 1-year TOM score. Conclusions: TEFTOM demonstrated good psychometric properties in this cohort of patients with ankle fractures. The TEF ‘expectation’ score was predictive of the TOM ‘outcome’ score. We recommend researchers and clinicians to utilize TEFTOM when patient expectation measurement is concerned for orthopaedic trauma patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.M. Golightly ◽  
R.F. DeVellis ◽  
E.M. Roos ◽  
L.S. Lohmander ◽  
M.T. Hannan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 3426-3431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Kyun Lee ◽  
Yong-Chan Ha ◽  
RobRoy L. Martin ◽  
Deuk-Soo Hwang ◽  
Kyung-Hoi Koo

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 694-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Desai ◽  
Alexander C. Peterson ◽  
Kevin Wing ◽  
Alastair Younger ◽  
Trafford Crump ◽  
...  

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used as measures of effectiveness of interventions. To make the tools more useful, therapeutic thresholds known as minimally important differences have been developed. The objective of this study was to calculate minimally important differences for the domains of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for hallux valgus surgery. Methods: The study was based on a retrospective analysis of patients newly scheduled for bunion correction surgery and completing patient-reported outcomes between October 2013 and January 2018. This study used anchor- and distribution-based approaches to calculate the minimally important difference for the instrument’s 5 domains. Confidence intervals were calculated for each approach. There were 91 participants included in the study. Results: Using anchor- and distribution-based approaches, the minimally important difference for the pain domain ranged from 5.8 to 10.2, from 0.3 to 6.9 for the symptoms domain, 8.3 to 10.3 for the activities of daily living domain, 7.4 to 11.1 for the quality of life domain, and from 7.0 to 15.7 for the sports and recreation domain. Small differences in the activities of daily living domain may be more clinically important for patients with better function. Discussion: The range of minimally important difference values for each domain indicate how the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score corresponded to bunion correction surgery. The sports and recreation domain showed considerable variability in the range of values and may be associated with the domain’s lack of responsiveness. Overall, most minimally important difference values for the domains of FAOS ranged from above 4 to below 16. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Cristina Alegre-Muelas ◽  
Jorge Alegre-Ayala ◽  
Elisabet Huertas-Hoyas ◽  
MªRosa Martínez-Piédrola ◽  
Jorge Pérez-Corrales ◽  
...  

The Activity Card Sort (ACS) measures the level of participation, as perceived by each person which, unlike other scales, makes it both personal and significant. However, there is a limitation to applying the ACS to Spanish older adults as it is restricted to culturally relevant activities solely in the United States. Therefore, the aim of this study was to select activity items that reflected Spanish older adults’ lifestyles in order to develop the Activity Card Sort-Spain Version (ACS-SP). Frequently, activities performed in Spain (n=103) were listed in an initial draft. The Likert scale was administrated to a large group of Spanish nationals over the age of 60 years (n=98) to establish which type of activities will be eventually included in the Spanish version. The final version was drawn up comprising 79 activities distributed between four performance areas. In addition, other activities that were not previously included by other assessment tools were considered and have been listed in this review, such as taking a nap, going out for a drink or “tapas,” or searching for a job. The gradual adaptation to ACS for Spaniards will make it possible to measure the level of an individual’s participation within a community. However, further work on psychometric properties is needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Gómez-Valero ◽  
Fernando García-Pérez ◽  
Mariano Tomás Flórez-García ◽  
Juan Carlos Miangolarra-Page

Background The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review of self-administered shoulder-disability functional assessment questionnaires adapted to Spanish, analyzing the quality of the transcultural adaptation and the clinimetric properties of the new version. Methods A search of the main biomedical databases was conducted to locate Spanish shoulder function assessment scales. The authors reviewed the papers and considered whether the process of adaptation of the questionnaire had followed international recommendations, and whether its psychometric properties had been appropriately assessed. Results The search identified nine shoulder function assessment scales adapted to Spanish: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH), Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index (WORC), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI) and Wheelchair Users Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI). The DASH was adapted on three occasions and the SPADI on two. The transcultural adaptation procedure was generally satisfactory, albeit somewhat less rigorous for the SDQ and WUSPI. Reliability was analyzed in all cases. Validity was not measured for one of the adaptations of the DASH, nor was it measured for the SDQ. Conclusions The transcultural adaptation was satisfactory and the psychometric properties analyzed were similar to both the original version and other versions adapted to other languages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document