Musculoskeletal ultrasound in monitoring response to apremilast in psoriatic arthritis patients: results from a longitudinal study

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 3145-3151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fulvia Ceccarelli ◽  
Ramona Lucchetti ◽  
Carlo Perricone ◽  
Francesca Romana Spinelli ◽  
Enrica Cipriano ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Ying Leung ◽  
Kwok-Wah Ho ◽  
Edmund K Li ◽  
Martin Li ◽  
Lai-Wa Kwok ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 1792-1799 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH ◽  
OLIVER FITZGERALD ◽  
GEORGE A. WELLS ◽  
DAFNA D. GLADMAN ◽  
ROBERT LANDEWÉ ◽  
...  

Objective.At OMERACT 8 a framework for levels of evidence was proposed for the validation of biomarkers as surrogate outcome measures. We aimed to adapt this scheme in order to apply it in the setting of soluble biomarkers proposed to replace the measurement of damage endpoints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We also aimed to generate consensus on minimum standards for the design of longitudinal studies aimed at validating biomarkers.Methods.Before the meeting, the Soluble Biomarker Working Group prepared a preliminary framework and discussed various models for association and prediction related to the statistical strength domain. In addition, 3 Delphi exercises addressing longitudinal study design for RA, PsA, and AS were conducted within the working group and members of the Assessments in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA). This formed the basis for discussions among OMERACT 9 participants.Results.The proposed framework was accepted by consensus. In the study design domain a requirement for both prospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) in different drug classes was noted. A template for determining the level of statistical strength was proposed. The addition of a new domain on biomarker assay performance was considered essential, and participants suggested that for any biomarker this domain should be addressed first, i.e., before starting clinical validation studies. Participants agreed on most elements of a longitudinal study design template. Where consensus was lacking the working group has drafted solutions that constitute a basis for prospective validation studies.Conclusion.The OMERACT 9 Soluble Biomarker Group has successfully formulated a levels of evidence scheme and a study design template that will provide guidance to conduct validation studies in the setting of soluble biomarkers proposed to replace the measurement of damage endpoints in RA, PsA, and AS.


2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 758-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice A. Husted ◽  
Brian D. Tom ◽  
Vernon T. Farewell ◽  
Dafna D. Gladman

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 744.3-745
Author(s):  
Y.Y. Leung ◽  
K.-W. Ho ◽  
E. K.-M. Li ◽  
M. Li ◽  
L.-W. Kwok ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 462-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER T. RITCHLIN ◽  
ABRAR A. QURESHI ◽  
KURT de VLAM ◽  
COSTANTINO PITZALIS ◽  
PHILIP S. HELLIWELL ◽  
...  

Biomarkers can provide valuable insights into disease susceptibility and natural history and may serve as surrogate endpoints for a variety of different outcomes. At the 2008 annual meeting of GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis), members were updated on the development of biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Plenary presentations included a translational approach to biomarker development (Christopher Ritchlin, University of Rochester, NY, USA), biomarkers for psoriasis (Abrar Qureshi, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA), new data on biomarkers for damage in PsA (Kurt de Vlam, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium), and design considerations for a longitudinal study of joint damage being undertaken under the OMERACT umbrella with colleagues working on rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (Costantino Pitzalis, Barts and the London School of Medicine, London, UK; Oliver FitzGerald, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland). At the conclusion of this session, the meeting attendees discussed specific design issues of the proposed longitudinal study, including study duration, disease process core domains, and the instruments to be used in recording enthesitis, dactylitis, nail involvement, quality of life and structural damage. The appearance of new therapeutic options in PsA raises the need for sensitive biomarkers for both disease activity and outcome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1155.2-1156
Author(s):  
J. Büttner ◽  
A. M. Glimm ◽  
G. Kokolakis ◽  
M. Erdmann-Keding ◽  
G. R. Burmester ◽  
...  

Background:Up to 30% of all plaque-type psoriasis patients develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (1). Early diagnosis of PsA can be difficult due to its heterogenous manifestation and the lack of disease- specific biomarkers, but it is crucial for disease outcome. Recently, our group has shown that fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) can be a helpful diagnostic tool for early PsA diagnosis since it can differentiate between patients with confirmed PsA and suspected PsA (2).Objectives:To follow-up patients by FOI with confirmed and suspected PsA with special focus on the group of patients in which PsA could be confirmed between baseline and follow-up – and to compare with the findings of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US).Methods:Patients included in our previous study (1) were re-evaluated by FOI of both hands in a standardized manner using the predefined phases 1-3 (p1-p3) and the PrimaVistaMode (PVM). US in greyscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) were performed of the clinically dominant hand (for tenderness and/or swelling) in the dorsal and palmar view at wrist, MCP, PIP and DIP 2-5 joint levels for synovitis and tenosynovitis.Subsequently, a comparison of the findings in the affected joints was performed using US as the reference method. Furthermore, AUC was calculated to show the extent to which a new joint inflammation was associated with a change in diagnosis.Results:Of the 60 patients initially examined (1), 30 patients (dropout rate 50%) were followed-up approximately 3 years later. The patients were newly divided into 3 groups: Diagnosed PsA (n=14, Group I), still suspected PsA, (n=6, Group II) and in-between diagnosed PsA (n=10, Group III). Patients with a change in the diagnosis from suspected to diagnosed PsA (Group III) showed a significantly increased prevalence of joints with pathological findings in FOI (46% at baseline, 88% at follow-up; p=0.046), with an unchanged joint distribution pattern, i.e. with a dominant involvement of the DIP joints. Compared to baseline, patients of group III were three times more common to show enrichment in p3 in FOI at follow-up (1.7% vs. 7.0%; p=n.s.). Newly detected pathologic joints by FOI (PVM, p2) and US at follow-up were positively associated with the change of diagnosis from suspected PsA to confirmed PsA (FOI: AUC 0.78; GSUS: AUC 0.77).Using US in greyscale as reference, inflammatory changes in the joints were diagnosed in all 3 cohorts by means of FOI in P1 and P3 with high specificity (Group III: 90.6%, Group II: 97.5%, Group I: 94.2%) and low sensitivity (Group III: 24.4%, Group II: 20.3%, Group I: 19.8%).Conclusion:FOI appears to be helpful to differentiate between acute and chronic disease stages. Furthermore, it is specific for detecting inflammatory changes in the joints of the hands in PsA – in comparison to US. FOI could thereby become a helpful tool as a “dermatological-screening” method to select psoriasis patients with indication for further rheumatological evaluation.References:[1]Zachariae H. Prevalence of Joint Disease in Patients with Psoriasis: Implications for therapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(7):441–447. Review.[2]Erdmann-Keding M, Ohrndorf S, Werner SG, et al. Fluorescence optical imaging for the detection of potential psoriatic arthritis in comparison to musculoskeletal ultrasound. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019;17(9):913-921.Disclosure of Interests:Juliane Büttner: None declared, Anne-Marie Glimm: None declared, Georgios Kokolakis: None declared, Magdalena Erdmann-Keding: None declared, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Consultant of: AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma, Jens Klotsche: None declared, Sarah Ohrndorf: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document