Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Are short-term outcomes worse than with open surgery?

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 845-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gorgun ◽  
C. Benlice ◽  
M. A. Abbas ◽  
L. Stocchi ◽  
F. H. Remzi
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 653-653
Author(s):  
Masanori Hotchi ◽  
Yuhei Waki ◽  
Kazunori Tokuda ◽  
Masayoshi Obatake ◽  
Hiroshi Kotegawa ◽  
...  

653 Background: The impact of previous abdominal surgeries on the need for conversion to open surgery and on short-term outcomes during/after laparoscopic colorectal surgery was retrospectively investigated. This retrospective cohort study was conducted from May 2004 through October 2012. This study was conducted at Tokushima University Hospital and Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital. Methods: A total of 145 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic resection of the sigmoid colon and upper rectum were classified as not having previous abdominal surgery (NPAS group, n = 123) or as having previous abdominal surgery (PAS group, n = 22). Short-term outcomes were assessed between the two groups. Results: The population of previous abdominal surgery consisted of 6 appendectomy, 3 gastrectomy for gastric ulcer, 2 nephrectomy, 2 peritonitis and 11 others (2 duplication). There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, tumor location, tumor size, Stage, operating time, blood loss and number of lymph node harvest between the two groups. The conversion to open surgery was performed in 1 patient (4.5%) in the PAS group and 6 patients (4.9%) in the NPAS group. The intraoperative inadvertent enterotomy occurred in 1 patient in the NPAS group. There was no difference in postoperative morbility between the two groups. In the NPAS group, anastomotic leakage was observed in 3 cases. Ileus was observed in one case in the NPAS and none in the PAS. Postoperative hospital stay was 14 days in the PAS group and 16 days in the NPAS group. Conclusions: Short-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer with previous abdominal surgery are acceptable.


2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. e483-e487 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Krishna ◽  
M. Russell ◽  
G. L. Richardson ◽  
M. J. F. X. Rickard ◽  
A. Keshava

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleny Novaes Figueiredo ◽  
Fabio Guilherme Campos ◽  
Luiz Augusto D’Albuquerque ◽  
Sergio Carlos Nahas ◽  
Ivan Cecconello ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143
Author(s):  
H. Huhta ◽  
S. Vuolio ◽  
I. Typpö ◽  
A. Rahko ◽  
K. Suokanerva ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Over the past decades, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become widely used for various indications. Large multicenter studies have demonstrated that laparoscopy has clear advantages over open surgery. Compared to open procedures, laparoscopy decreases perioperative blood loss, post-operative pain, and hospitalization time, but provides equivalent long-term oncological and surgical results. Most studies have been conducted in high-volume institutions with selected patients, which may have influenced the reported outcome of laparoscopy. Here, we investigated the primary outcome of all laparoscopic colorectal resections performed between 2005 and 2015 in a low-volume center. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included bowel resections performed between 2005 and 2015 in the Lapland Central Hospital. Data were retrieved from electronic patient registries, and all operations that began as a laparoscopy were included. Patient records were investigated to determine the primary surgical outcome and possible complications within the first 30 days after surgery. Results: During 2005–2015, 385 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed. Indications included benign (n = 166 patients, 43.1%) and malignant lesions (n = 219 cases, 56.9%). The median patient age was 68 years, and 50.4% were male. The median American Society of Anesthesiologist score was III, and 48.5% of patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologist class of III or IV. The median hospital stay after surgery was 6 days (interquartile range: 3.8). The conversion rate to open surgery rate was 13%. The total surgical complication rate was 24.2%, and re-operation was required in 11.2% of patients. A total of 26 patients had anastomotic leakage, of which 16 required re-operations. The 30-day mortality was 0.8%. Conclusion: Our results showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a peripheral hospital resulted in primary outcome rates within the range of those reported in previous multicenter trials. Therefore, the routine use of laparoscopic colorectal resections with high-quality outcome is feasible in small and peripheral surgical units.


2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 1076-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Cima ◽  
Rajesh Pendlimari ◽  
Stefan D. Holubar ◽  
Jirawat Pattana-arun ◽  
David W. Larson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document