A Theoretical Model for Predicting Fracture Strength and Critical Flaw Size of the ZrB2-ZrC Composites at High Temperatures

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-646
Author(s):  
Ruzhuan Wang ◽  
Xiaobo Li ◽  
Jing Wang ◽  
Bi Jia ◽  
Weiguo Li
2008 ◽  
Vol 368-372 ◽  
pp. 1785-1787
Author(s):  
Tao Zeng ◽  
Dai Ning Fang ◽  
Xia Mei Lu ◽  
Fei Fei Zhou

This paper presents a theoretical model to predict the fracture strength of ultra-high temperature ceramics (UHTCs). According to different mechanisms, the environmental temperature is divided into four ranges. Effects of temperature and oxidation on the fracture strength of UHTCs are investigated in each temperature range. The results show that oxidation plays an important role in enhancing the fracture strength of UHTCs at high temperatures.


Author(s):  
S. Kalyanam ◽  
P. Krishnaswamy ◽  
E. M. Focht ◽  
D.-J. Shim ◽  
F. W. Brust ◽  
...  

The integrity of high density polyethylene (HDPE) piping and fusion joints are a topic of interest to the nuclear industry, regulators, ASME code, and the plastics pipe industry. The ASME Code Case N-755-1 has been approved and addresses the use of HDPE in safety related applications. Over the last few years some of the concerns identified with the parent HDPE pipe material and the fusion joints have been addressed while others are still being resolved. One such unresolved concern is the effect of the fusion process on the integrity of the joint, specifically, the introduction of flaws during the fusion process. The potential impact of flaws in the fusion joint on the service life of the HDPE piping is being evaluated. The current study calculates stress intensity factors (SIF) for circumferential flaws and uses them to evaluate the potential structural integrity of HDPE fusion joints in pipes. The recent API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard provides SIF (KI) solutions to various semi-elliptical and full-circumferential (360°) surface cracks/flaws on the outer surface (OD) and the inner surface (ID). The API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 standard SIF tables and finite element analysis (FEA) of selected cases were used to develop simplified SIF relations for full-circumferential surface flaws that can be used for plastic pipes with diameters ranging from 101.6 mm (4 inch) through 914.4 mm (36 inch) and dimensional ratios (DRs) from 7 through 13. Further, the SIF of embedded flaws akin to lack-of-fusion regions was evaluated. The results from this study serve as precursors to understanding and advancing experimental methods to address important issues related to the critical tolerable flaw size in the butt-fusion joint material and were utilized to select the specimen tests and hydrostatic pipe tests used to evaluate various joining processes. Further, they will help with understanding the essential variables that control the long-term component integrity and structural performance of HDPE pipe joints in ASME Class 3 nuclear piping.


Author(s):  
Warren Bamford ◽  
Guy De Boo

Acceptance criteria have been developed for indications found during inspection of reactor vessel in upper head penetrations. These criteria were originally developed for inside surface flaws, as part of an industry program coordinated by NUMARC (now NEI) in 1992. These criteria were not inserted into Section XI at the time, because inspections were not required for these regions. In developing the enclosed acceptance criteria, the approach used by the industry group was similar to that used in other portions of Section XI, in that an industry consensus was reached using input from the operating utility technical staff, each of the three PWR vendors, and representatives of the NRC staff. The criteria developed are applicable to all PWR plant designs. The discovery of leaks at Oconee, ANO-1, and several other plants, have led to the imposition of inspection requirements for head penetration regions, and therefore the need to develop criteria for indications in all portions of the tubes. This would include indications on the inside diameter of the tube, as well as on the outside diameter of the tube below the attachment weld, and flaws in the attachment weld itself. The criteria presented herein are limits on flaw sizes which are acceptable. The criteria are to be applied to inspection results. It should be noted that determination of the period of future service during which the criteria are satisfied is plant-specific and dependent on flaw geometry and loading conditions. It has been previously demonstrated by each of the owners groups that the penetrations are very tolerant of flaws. It was concluded that complete fracture of the penetration would not occur unless very large through-wall flaws were present; therefore, protection against leakage during service is the priority. The approach used here is more conservative than that used in Section XI applications where the acceptable flaw size is calculated by putting a margin on the critical flaw size. In this case, the critical flaw size is far too large to allow a practical application of this approach, so protection against leakage is the key element used to define the acceptance criteria. Also, the use of flaw acceptance standards tables is not allowed for this region, for penetrations which are susceptible to stress corrosion cracking. The acceptance criteria apply to all flaw types regardless of orientation and shape. The same approach is used by Section XI, where flaws are characterized according to established rules and their future predicted size is then compared with the acceptance criteria.


1997 ◽  
Vol 132-136 ◽  
pp. 603-606
Author(s):  
Tatjana Volkov-Husović ◽  
R.M. Jančić ◽  
Zoran V. Popović

Author(s):  
Kenji Oyamada ◽  
Shinji Konosu ◽  
Hikaru Miyata ◽  
Takashi Ohno

There are several Fitness-For-Service (FFS) standards with evaluation rules in terms of plastic collapse for a pressure vessel or piping component possessing a local metal loss area simultaneously subjected to internal pressure and bending moment. The authors have already reported the results of a comparative study of FFS rules, including the remaining strength factor (RSF) approach in Part 5 of API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 and the p-M diagram method, which pointed out that there could be significant differences in allowable flaw sizes. This paper describes an additional comparative study on the difference of allowable flaw size for local metal loss assessment between the RSF approach in Part 5 of API 579-1/ASME FFS-1 and the p-M diagram method, focusing on the effect of decreasing yield strength of the material at high temperatures, such as 350 degrees C. The allowable flaw depth at high temperatures derived from API579-1/ASME FFS-1 is larger than that derived by means of the p-M diagram method. However, it is verified by the finite element analysis that the allowable flaw size of the p-M diagram method is set on the stress state of general yielding near a local metal loss area if safety factor is not considered and it is possible to evade ratcheting due to cyclic bending moment in service, such as that caused by earthquake, etc.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2008.1 (0) ◽  
pp. 295-296
Author(s):  
Chisato WAKABAYASHI ◽  
Yohtaro MATSUO ◽  
Kouichi YASUDA ◽  
Tadashi SHIOTA
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document