Human capital, technological progress and technology diffusion across Europe: education matters

Empirica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinatin Akhvlediani ◽  
Andrzej Cieślik
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Hongbo Jiang

FDI and human capital flow, as an important path of international technology diffusion, is an important driving force for technological progress in a region. Using panel data of 30 provinces and cities in China, this paper examines the relationship between FDI, human capital flow and technological progress in different regions of China. The empirical results show that the two approaches play an important role in technological progress in different regions of China, but the contribution degree is different. Various regions should implement appropriate policies to make full use of the technology spillover effect of export and human capital flow to accelerate technological progress, and form a smooth domestic technology diffusion mechanism to accelerate the transmission of foreign RESEARCH and development, and finally promote the coordinated development of regional economy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 2803
Author(s):  
Huaide Wen ◽  
Jun Dai

This paper extends the “sources of growth” explanation for the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) proposed by Copeland and Taylor in a concise theoretical framework, that is, when the sources of growth are transformed from physical capital and labor to human capital and knowledge, the environmental pollution could at first rise and then fall with a sustainable growth in per capita income. Using the provincial panel data from 1995 to 2017 in the mainland of China, an empirical analysis is carried out by the System Generalized Method of Moment (sys-GMM). The results show that: first, the EKC hypothesis exists in China. The inflection point for SO2 emissions has been passed in all of the provincial regions, and for CO2 and comprehensive environmental pollution losses have not been passed in some regions, but the inflection point from the national average level in China has been passed; second, the main production factors of the traditional economy, physical capital and labor, are positively correlated with environmental pollution, while human capital and green technological progress, the main production factors of the knowledge economy, are negatively related to environmental pollution; third, human capital and green technological progress have become important factors to promote economic growth, and human capital, in particular, has become the primary factor, which indicates that China is in the process of transforming traditional economy into a knowledge economy. The stage of China’s economic development and the trend of environmental pollution is consistent with the extended “sources of growth” explanation for the EKC, which proved the theoretical hypothesis. This has an important practical significance for China’s current economic reform and important theoretical value for the economic transformation and sustainable development of developing countries. The paper finally puts forward corresponding policy recommendations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 674-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Greasley ◽  
Eoin McLaughlin ◽  
Nick Hanley ◽  
Les Oxley

AbstractComprehensive Investment (CI) may provide an indicator of future changes in a country's per capita consumption. The authors explore the utility of the CI indicator for Australia by constructing CI data since 1861 and by estimating their relationship with changes in future consumption over periods of 50 years ahead. The CI measures include changes in natural, produced and human capital, and make allowance for exogenous technological progress. The results are used to consider how Australia's natural capital exploitation influenced the consumption of future generations. Further, the authors gauge if low CI relative to other leading OECD countries resulted in lower consumption levels in Australia over time than feasible, had it saved more.


2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen López-Pueyo ◽  
Sara Barcenilla ◽  
Gregorio Giménez

The aim of the paper is to investigate the effect of a new international estimate of human capital on the process of innovation and technology catch-up in developed countries. The new human capital variable is a measure of average human capital efficiency per hour worked that considers the role of both the quantity and quality of education. Our methodology is based on the framework proposed by Jess Benhabib and Mark A. Spiegel (2005) that uses a logistic function of technology diffusion. The analysis employs panel econometrics and tackles the endogeneity bias. Empirical results show robust evidence of the significance of this human capital variable as a driver of innovation and diffusion. The effects of cognitive skills on technological progress are higher the closer the economies are to the technology frontier. Furthermore, as technological progress has been measured using the improved total factor productivity (TFP) variables built in Penn World Table (PWT) 8.0, we confirm the existence of social returns to human capital.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 271-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alise Vitola ◽  
Maija Senfelde

The purpose of the article is to survey the significant literature on the role of institutions – formal and informal constraints that affect investment in physical and human capital – in economic performance and propose a new, comprehensive definition and classification of institutions, as well as to develop a conceptual model to illustrate the interaction between institutions and socioeconomic development. The literature shows that institutions played an important role in facilitating technological progress and leading the world into the modern economic regime. Moreover, quantitative research proves that institutions significantly impact socioeconomic performance around the globe.


Author(s):  
Paitoon Kraipornsak

Total Factor Productivity (TFP) growth has long been identified as an exogenous source of economic growth (the residual growth). Recently, there have been a number of economists who introduced and developed the view of endogenous growth model. An argument is that all important factors of source of growth are incorporated into the growth model, there should not present a significant exogenous residual growth. This paper presents an analysis on estimated TFP growth of which it could be considered as a factor of technological progress that is viable in the economy as it is believed. This study included human capital input into the estimated sectoral production function as an essential factor input that can explain capacity of knowledge advancement and an effective innovation in the economy. Human capital is therefore considered to play an essential role in modern growth theory. However, empirically, the effect of human capital on growth and productivity has been inconclusive probably due to the estimation problem. Frequently macroeconomic time series are often non stationary, this study cautiously dealt with the estimation in line with stationary time series econometrics. In this paper, human capital index was constructed based on the Mincerain wage equation and was augmented into the production function for the analysis of growth. The results of the estimation indicated the existence of long run positive contribution of the TFP growth in agriculture but insignificant long run contribution to growth in services. Human capital also positively contributed to growth in agriculture but it was insignificantly contributed to growth in industry and services. Remarkably, physical capital input was found the significant contribution to growth in all sectors. The study also estimated for the economy wide allowing all three sectors to interact among them and found that in the long run growth of industry can be traded off with those of agriculture and services. The TFP growth was also found significantly contributable to the long run growth of the economy. The finding is consistent with the new concept of endogenous growth hypothesis. The conventional concept of the TFP growth estimated from the two input production function was found inadequate to explain the contribution to growth. Human capital was found to be the third factor input that must be included in the estimation of production function. The residual growth or the shift of production function or the TFP growth in this study can mainly be explained by technological progress that is not represented by any other factor of advancement. Nevertheless, this technological progress or the TFP growth must be incorporated and be estimated at the same time in the model but not as being the residual of the regression equation. Therefore, the residual growth in line with the conventional concept must be insignificant. Additionally, because the findings excluded the essential factors, which is human capital input from the estimated standard two factor input models, it caused the residual growth to be significant, as found in the past.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document