Item Response Theory Analyses of the Parent and Teacher Ratings of the DSM-IV ADHD Rating Scale

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 865-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rapson Gomez
Suchttherapie ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Sleczka ◽  
D Piontek ◽  
B Braun ◽  
L Kraus ◽  
G Bühringer

PSICOBIETTIVO ◽  
2010 ◽  
pp. 91-118

Contesto: Il lutto č un'esperienza universale e la sua associazione con morbilitŕ e mortalitŕ in eccesso č ben definita. Tuttavia, il lutto diventa una seria preoccupazione per la salute in una minoranza di casi. Per tali individui l'intenso cordoglio persiste, č doloroso e invalidante e puň soddisfare i criteri di un disturbo mentale distinto. Al momento, il lutto non č riconosciuta come un disturbo mentale nel DSM-IV o nell'ICD-10. L'obiettivo di questo studio č di determinare la validitŕ psicometrica dei criteri del disturbo da lutto prolungato (Prolonged Grief Disorder, PGD) per migliorare la rilevazione e il trattamento potenziale degli individui in lutto a maggiore rischio di dolore persistente e disfunzioni. Metodi e Risultati: Un totale di 291 soggetti in lutto č stato intervistato per tre volte, raggruppato in gruppi da 0-6, 6-12 e 12-24 mesi post-perdita. Le analisi della Item Response Theory (IRT) hanno fornito i sintomi del PGD maggiormente informativi e obiettivi. Le analisi combinatorie hanno individuato l'algoritmo del PGD piů sensibile e specifico che č stato poi testato per valutarne la validitŕ psicometrica. I criteri richiedono reazioni ad una perdita significativa che includa l'esperienza dello struggimento (ad esempio, la sofferenza fisica o emotiva come un risultato del ricongiungimento voluto, ma incompiuto, con il defunto) e almeno cinque dei seguenti nove sintomi sperimentati almeno quotidianamente o in maniera invalidante: sentirsi emotivamente intorpiditi, storditi, o che la vita č priva di senso; vivere sfiduciati; amarezza per la perdita, difficoltŕ ad accettare la perdita; confusione di identitŕ; evitamento della realtŕ della perdita, o difficoltŕ di proseguire con la vita. I sintomi devono essere presenti a livelli sufficientemente alti da almeno sei mesi dalla morte ed essere associati ad una compromissione funzionale. Conclusioni: I criteri fissati per il PGD sembrano in grado di identificare le persone in lutto con un maggiore rischio di dolore e disfunzione permanente. I risultati confermano la validitŕ psicometrica dei criteri del PGD che proponiamo per l'inclusione nel DSM-V e nell'ICD-11.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 672-695
Author(s):  
Thomas DeVaney

This article presents a discussion and illustration of Mokken scale analysis (MSA), a nonparametric form of item response theory (IRT), in relation to common IRT models such as Rasch and Guttman scaling. The procedure can be used for dichotomous and ordinal polytomous data commonly used with questionnaires. The assumptions of MSA are discussed as well as characteristics that differentiate a Mokken scale from a Guttman scale. MSA is illustrated using the mokken package with R Studio and a data set that included over 3,340 responses to a modified version of the Statistical Anxiety Rating Scale. Issues addressed in the illustration include monotonicity, scalability, and invariant ordering. The R script for the illustration is included.


Author(s):  
Alexandra Foubert-Samier ◽  
Anne Pavy-Le Traon ◽  
Tiphaine Saulnier ◽  
Mélanie Le-Goff ◽  
Margherita Fabbri ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 781-781
Author(s):  
W Goette ◽  
A Carlew ◽  
J Schaffert ◽  
H Rossetti ◽  
L Lacritz

Abstract Objective Characterize three functional living scales under item response theory and examine these scales for evidence of differential item functioning (DIF) by participant and/or informant ethnicity and education. Method Baseline data from 3155 participants [Mage = 70.59(9.55); Medu = 13.3(4.26); 61.72%female] enrolled in the Texas Alzheimer’s Research and Care Consortium with data from the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR; functional items), Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS), and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) were used. The sample was predominately white (93.94%) and 35.97% identified as Hispanic. Graded response models fit all three tests best. DIF was examined by iteratively dropping item-by-item constraints and then testing model fit. Results The CDR demonstrated overall good item functioning with clear separation between all of the rating categories for each item, while the PSMS and IADL did not, suggesting the item ratings should be reconsidered. DIF was observed by ethnicity (Hispanic v. non-Hispanic) and education (separated into low, average, high) for every item on all three scales (all ps ≤ .01 after adjustment for multiple observations). Hispanic ethnicity and higher education subjects were more likely to be rated as more impaired. Conclusions Results suggest these three commonly used functional scales have DIF depending on the ethnicity and education of the patient. This finding has implications for understanding functional change in certain populations, particularly the potential for mischaracterization of impairment in minority samples. The finding that individuals with higher education tended to be rated as more functionally impaired warrants further investigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 790-790
Author(s):  
W Goette ◽  
A Carlew ◽  
J Schaffert ◽  
H Rossetti ◽  
L Lacritz

Abstract Objective Examine prediction of functional ability with neuropsychological tests using latent item response theory. Method The sample included 3155 individuals (Mage = 69.72, SD = 9.41; Median education =13.15, SD = 4.40; white = 92.81%; female = 62.03%; MCI = 25.13%; Dementia = 28.87%) from the Texas Alzheimer’s Research and Care Consortium who completed functional and cognitive assessments [Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Logical Memory (LM), Visual Reproduction (VR), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Trail Making Test (TMT), Boston Naming Test, and Digit Span]. Functional measures [Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, Physical Self Maintenance Scale, and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living)] were combined into a single outcome variable using confirmatory factor analysis. Item response theory (IRT) was used to fit the data, and latent regression to predict the latent trait score using neuropsychological data. Results All three functional scales loaded onto a single factor and demonstrated good construct coverage and measurement reliability (Supporting Figure). A graded response IRT model best fit the functional ability composite measure. MMSE (b = −1.08, p < .001), LM II (b = −0.58, p < .001), VR I and II (b = −0.09, p = .02 and b = −0.43, p < .001, respectively), COWAT (b = −0.10, p = .003), and TMT-B (b = −0.30, p < .001) all significantly predicted functional abilities, as did age (b = 0.61, p < .001) and education (b = 0.31, p < .001). Conclusions Global cognition, memory and executive function tests predicted functional abilities while attention and language tasks did not. These results suggest that certain neuropsychological tests meaningfully predict functional abilities in elderly cognitively normal and cognitively impaired individuals. Further research is needed to determine whether these cognitive domains are predictive of functional abilities in other clinical disorders.


2010 ◽  
Vol 108 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tulshi D. Saha ◽  
Wilson M. Compton ◽  
Attila J. Pulay ◽  
Frederick S. Stinson ◽  
W. June Ruan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document