Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (PreBERS): Test–Retest Reliability and Inter-Rater Reliability

Background: The Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS) is a new assessment scale for dystonia and choreoathetosis in children and youth with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Today, the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) is mostly used to assess dystonia in children with inherited dystonia. The aim of this study was to assess reliability and validity of the DIS in children and youth with inherited or idiopathic dystonia. Methods: Reliability was measured by (1) the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for inter-rater and test-retest reliability, as well as (2) standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable difference (MDD). For concurrent validity of the DIS-dystonia subscale, the BFM was administered. Results: In total, 11 males and 9 females (median age 16 years and 7 months, range 6 to 24 years) were included. For inter-rater reliability, the ICCs for the DIS total score and the dystonia and choreoathetosis subscale scores were 0.83, 0.87, and 0.71, respectively. For test-retest reliability, the ICCs for the DIS total score and the dystonia and choreoathetosis subscale scores were 0.95, 0.88, and 0.93, respectively. The SEM and MDD for the total DIS were 3.98% and 11.04%, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the dystonia subscale and the BFM was 0.88 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Good to excellent inter-rater, test-retest reliability, and validity were found for the total DIS and the dystonia subscale. The choreoathetosis subscale showed moderate inter-rater reliability and excellent test-retest reliability. The DIS may be a promising tool to assess dystonia and choreoathetosis in children and young adults with inherited or idiopathic dystonia.

Download Full-text

The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Long Term Test-Retest Reliability

Behavioral Disorders ◽

10.1177/019874290102600403 ◽

2001 ◽

Vol 26 (4) ◽

pp. 314-320 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Michael H. Epstein ◽

Melody A. Hertzog ◽

Robert Reid

Keyword(s):

General Education ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Time Frame ◽

Assessment Instrument ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Strength Based ◽

Report Data ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Emotional Rating

Most assessment is conducted from a deficit perspective and is intended to identify deficits, problems, and pathologies of the individuals who are assessed. However, deficit-based assessment may present a biased picture that limits or ignores a child's strengths. In this article we report data on long-term (6-month) test-retest reliability of the Behavior and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS), which is a strength-based assessment instrument. Participants included 95 randomly selected children from general education classrooms and 26 children identified as having or being at risk for emotional or behavioral disorders. Moderate to high test-retest correlations ranging from .527 to .787 were found across the instrument's subscales. Moreover, the lack of significant differences between ratings indicate that rater drift did not occur. Results suggest that BERS scores are stable over a 6-month time frame. Implications for the use of the BERS are discussed.

Download Full-text

Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of Barkley Adult Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Screening Tool among the Elderly

Scientifica ◽

10.1155/2017/9109783 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2017 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mostafa Sadeghi ◽

Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani ◽

Shahrokh Amiri

Keyword(s):

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Attention Deficit ◽

Concurrent Validity ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Hyperactivity Disorder ◽

Persian Version ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Tabriz City

Background. The Barkley Adult Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale-IV (BAARS-IV) was developed, and it demonstrated good psychometric properties. The BAARS-IV includes 27 questions on the symptoms of adult ADHD. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the psychometric testing of the Persian version of BAARS-IV among the elderlies in Tabriz City. Method. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Tabriz City—in the west of Iran—in 2015 via enrolling of 121 old-aged people. We did the process of translation and adaptation of BAARS-IV and examined its concurrent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Result. The BAARS-IV demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Correlations between the BAARS-IV and the CAARS-S: SV were high and evidence supporting concurrent validity was revealed. Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scale and subscales stood at 0.89, 0.81, 0.66, 0.56, and 0.82, respectively. Conclusion. The Persian BAARS-IV showed acceptable reliability and validity. BAARS-IV was determined to be composed of internally consistent and psychometrically sound items.

Download Full-text

Test-Retest Reliability of the Self-Reported Impairments in Persons With Late Effects of Polio (SIPP) Rating Scale

PM&R ◽

10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.09.023 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 8 (5) ◽

pp. 399-404 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Christina Brogårdh ◽

Jan Lexell

Keyword(s):

Late Effects ◽

Rating Scale ◽

The Self ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Download Full-text

Test–retest reliability and construct validity of Contour Drawing Rating Scale scores in a sample of early adolescent girls

Body Image ◽

10.1016/s1740-1445(03)00024-x ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 199-205 ◽

Cited By ~ 67

Author(s):

Eleanor H Wertheim ◽

Susan J Paxton ◽

Linda Tilgner

Keyword(s):

Construct Validity ◽

Adolescent Girls ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Early Adolescent ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Scale Scores ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Download Full-text

Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Counseling Competencies Scale-Revised

Frontiers in Psychology ◽

10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688539 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Wei Xia ◽

William Ho Cheung Li ◽

Tingna Liang ◽

Yuanhui Luo ◽

Laurie Long Kwan Ho ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Concurrent Validity ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Correlation Coefficients ◽

Psychometric Evaluation ◽

Counseling Competencies ◽

Counselors In Training ◽

Rater Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Objectives: This study conducted a linguistic and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Counseling Competencies Scale-Revised (CCS-R).Methods: The Chinese CCS-R was created from the original English version using a standard forward-backward translation process. The psychometric properties of the Chinese CCS-R were examined in a cohort of 208 counselors-in-training by two independent raters. Fifty-three counselors-in-training were asked to undergo another counseling performance evaluation for the test-retest. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted for the Chinese CCS-R, followed by internal consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, convergent validity, and concurrent validity.Results: The results of the CFA supported the factorial validity of the Chinese CCS-R, with adequate construct replicability. The scale had a McDonald's omega of 0.876, and intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.63 and 0.90 for test-retest reliability and inter-rater reliability, respectively. Significantly positive correlations were observed between the Chinese CCS-R score and scores of performance checklist (Pearson's γ = 0.781), indicating a large convergent validity, and knowledge on drug abuse (Pearson's γ = 0.833), indicating a moderate concurrent validity.Conclusion: The results support that the Chinese CCS-R is a valid and reliable measure of the counseling competencies.Practice implication: The CCS-R provides trainers with a reliable tool to evaluate counseling students' competencies and to facilitate discussions with trainees about their areas for growth.

Download Full-text

Reliability of a conductive education rating scale for assessing children with multiple disabilities

The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist ◽

10.1017/s0816512200027012 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 12-17

Author(s):

Jeff Sigafoos ◽

Donna Couzens ◽

Stephanie Gunn

Keyword(s):

Interobserver Agreement ◽

Rating Scale ◽

Multiple Disabilities ◽

Intelligence Tests ◽

Adaptive Behaviour ◽

Education Programs ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Test Retest Reliability

ABSTRACTAdaptive behaviour scales represent an alternative to standardised intelligence tests for assessing children with multiple disabilities. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of an adaptive behaviour scale used in Hungarian Conductive Education programs for children with neurological impairments. Forty-five children with multiple disabilities were assessed on two separate occasions by their teachers and physiotherapists. Scores were compared across raters (interobserver agreement) and across the two assessment occasions (test-retest reliability). Interobserver agreement averaged 55.5%, and the overall test-retest reliability was 75%. Suggestions for improving interobserver agreement and test-retest reliability are discussed.

Download Full-text

A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised

Clinical Rehabilitation ◽

10.1177/0269215520927445 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 34 (8) ◽

pp. 1112-1121

Author(s):

Jing Wang ◽

Haibo Di ◽

Wen Hua ◽

Liwen Cheng ◽

Zhigang Xia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Concurrent Validity ◽

Reliability And Validity ◽

Disorders Of Consciousness ◽

Chinese Version ◽

Rater Reliability ◽

Validity Data ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Coma Scale ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Objective: The aim of the study was to check on the reliability and validity of the translated version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised. Design: Prospective psychometric study. Setting: Rehabilitation and neurology unit in hospital. Subjects: Patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Interventions: None. Main measures: The original English version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was translated into Chinese. The reliability and validity were undertaken by trained raters. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to investigate internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation was used to calculate concurrent validity. The Coma Recovery Scale–revised was used to assess the consciousness of patients. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study. Inter-rater reliability of the Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised was high for total scores and motor and verbal subscores and good for facial subscores. Test–retest reliability was high for total score and for all subscores. Analysis revealed a moderate internal consistency for subscores. For the concurrent validity, a strong correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability behavioral scale for all patients. A moderate correlation was found between the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised and the Coma Recovery Scale–revised scores for all patients. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Nociception Coma Scale–Revised has good reliability and validity data for assessing responses to pain in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.

Download Full-text