scholarly journals Beat-by-beat assessment of cardiac afterload using descending aortic velocity–pressure loop during general anesthesia: a pilot study

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrice Vallée ◽  
Arthur Le Gall ◽  
Jona Joachim ◽  
Olivier Passouant ◽  
Joaquim Matéo ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 317 (6) ◽  
pp. H1354-H1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hong ◽  
J. Joachim ◽  
C. Buxin ◽  
C. Levé ◽  
A. Le Gall ◽  
...  

Cardiac afterload is usually assessed in the ascending aorta and can be defined by the association of peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), total arterial compliance (Ctot), and aortic wave reflection (WR). We recently proposed the global afterload angle (GALA) and β-angle derived from the aortic velocity-pressure (VP) loop as continuous cardiac afterload monitoring in the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of this study was to 1) describe the arterial mechanic properties by studying the velocity-pressure relations according to cardiovascular risk (low-risk and high-risk patients) in the ascending and descending thoracic aorta and 2) analyze the association between the VP loop (GALA and β-angle) and cardiac afterload parameters (PVR, Ctot, and WR). PVR, Ctot, WR, and VP loop parameters were measured in the ascending and descending thoracic aorta in 50 anesthetized patients. At each aortic level, the mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and PVR were similar between low-risk and high-risk patients. In contrast, Ctot, WR, GALA, and β-angle were strongly influenced by cardiovascular risk factors regardless of the site of measurement along the aorta. The GALA angle was inversely related to aortic compliance, and the β-angle reflected the magnitude of wave reflection in both the ascending and descending aortas ( P < 0.001). Under general anesthesia, the VP loop can provide new visual insights into arterial mechanical properties compared with the traditional MAP and CO for the assessment of cardiac afterload. Further studies are necessary to demonstrate the clinical utility of the VP loop in the operating room. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our team recently proposed the global afterload angle (GALA) and β-angle derived from the aortic velocity-pressure (VP) loop as continuous cardiac afterload monitoring in the descending thoracic aorta under general anesthesia. However, the evaluation of cardiac afterload at this location is unusual. The present study shows that VP loop parameters can describe the components of cardiac afterload both in the ascending and descending thoracic aorta in the operating room. Aging and cardiovascular risk factors strongly influence VP loop parameters. The VP loop could provide continuous visual additional information on the arterial system than the traditional mean arterial pressure and cardiac output during the general anesthesia.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (C) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Arthur Le Gall ◽  
Jona Joachim ◽  
Joaquim Mateo ◽  
Alexandre Mebazaa ◽  
Etienne Gayat ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-50
Author(s):  
Jhoni Pardomuan Pasaribu ◽  
Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi ◽  
Pontisomaya Parami

Background: Intubation is a common essential procedure to maintain the airway during general anesthesia. Various video laryngoscopes (VL) on the market today assist anesthesiologists in improving intubation success rates and also in complicated airway cases. There are two types of VL found in our institution, which are C-MAC and McGrath®. Each of them has its pros and cons, which withdrawn our curiosity to compare their effectiveness.  Methods: A pilot study was conducted in our center; we included all patients undergoing general anesthesia with physical status ASA I-III and consent to the study and divide them into two groups, C-MAC and McGrath®. We compare C-MAC and McGrath® VL effectiveness in terms of time for intubation, ease of intubation, total attempt, failure to intubate, Cormack Lehane degree, POGO Score, and hemodynamic stability.  Results: A total of 20 patients were intubated with two different VL, ten patients for each group. Both VLs accommodate ease of intubation, and overall first attempt successful intubation, though C-MAC showed better laryngeal and glottic visualization, shorter tracheal intubation times, and less hemodynamic change. Conclusion: C-MAC gives better results in laryngeal and glottic visualization, shorter tracheal intubation times, and less hemodynamic change.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-54
Author(s):  
Brillyan Jehosua Toar ◽  
I Putu Pramana Suarjaya ◽  
IGAG Utara Hartawan ◽  
Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi

Background: Avoiding excessive doses of anesthesia was fundamental, mainly to reduce the adverse effect of anesthesia. Electroencephalography (EEG)-based monitors can be used to measure the depth level of anesthesia and guide intraoperative hypnosis drug and opioid administration. This study aims to evaluate the benefit of using CONOX monitor when administering anesthesia drugs in laparotomy procedures. Method: Twenty patients aged 18-65 years with physical status ASA I-III who underwent major laparotomy surgery with general anesthesia total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) were divided into two groups. Group A received general anesthesia guided with the CONOX monitor, while group B using standard clinical care. We later evaluate the total use of propofol and fentanyl, intraoperative hemodynamic profile, postoperative cognitive disorder (POCD), intraoperative awareness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and moderate to severe pain in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Results: The mean total propofol used is lower in CONOX group (63.6 ± 11.7 mcg/kg/min vs. 74 ± 17.87 mcg/kg/min). A similar result was obtained with fentanyl. The CONOX group use a lower total of fentanyl (212.5 ± 32.3 mcg vs. 249 ± 54.6 mcg) than the control group. POCD was found to be more prevalent in the control group (5 vs 2 patients). While there is no report of intraoperative awareness. Conclusion: The incidence of PONV and moderate to severe pain in PACU was similar between the two groups. This pilot study is a preliminary study to evaluate the benefit of using EEG-based monitors to adjust anesthesia drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document