Minimizing prediction errors in predictive processing: from inconsistency to non-representationalism

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 997-1017
Author(s):  
Thomas van Es
Author(s):  
Michiel Van Elk ◽  
Harold Bekkering

We characterize theories of conceptual representation as embodied, disembodied, or hybrid according to their stance on a number of different dimensions: the nature of concepts, the relation between language and concepts, the function of concepts, the acquisition of concepts, the representation of concepts, and the role of context. We propose to extend an embodied view of concepts, by taking into account the importance of multimodal associations and predictive processing. We argue that concepts are dynamically acquired and updated, based on recurrent processing of prediction error signals in a hierarchically structured network. Concepts are thus used as prior models to generate multimodal expectations, thereby reducing surprise and enabling greater precision in the perception of exemplars. This view places embodied theories of concepts in a novel predictive processing framework, by highlighting the importance of concepts for prediction, learning and shaping categories on the basis of prediction errors.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz Köster ◽  
Miriam Langeloh ◽  
Christine Michel ◽  
Stefanie Hoehl

AbstractExamining how young infants respond to unexpected events is key to our understanding of their emerging concepts about the world around them. From a predictive processing perspective, it is intriguing to investigate how the infant brain responds to unexpected events (i.e., prediction errors), because they require infants to refine their predictive models about the environment. Here, to better understand prediction error processes in the infant brain, we presented 9-month-olds (N = 36) a variety of physical and social events with unexpected versus expected outcomes, while recording their electroencephalogram. We found a pronounced response in the ongoing 4 – 5 Hz theta rhythm for the processing of unexpected (in contrast to expected) events, for a prolonged time window (2 s) and across all scalp-recorded electrodes. The condition difference in the theta rhythm was not related to the condition difference in infants’ event-related activity on the negative central (Nc) component (.4 – .6 s), which has been described in former studies. These findings constitute critical evidence that the theta rhythm is involved in the processing of prediction errors from very early in human brain development, which may support infants’ refinement of basic concepts about the physical and social environment.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo‐Hua Huang ◽  
Peter Rupprecht ◽  
Michael Schebesta ◽  
Fabrizio Serluca ◽  
Kyohei Kitamura ◽  
...  

SummaryIntelligent behavior requires a comparison between the predicted and the actual consequences of behavioral actions. According to the theory of predictive processing, this comparison relies on a neuronal error signal that reflects the mismatch between an internal prediction and sensory input. Inappropriate error signals may generate pathological experiences in neuropsychiatric conditions. To examine the processing of sensorimotor prediction errors across different telencephalic brain areas we optically measured neuronal activity in head-fixed, adult zebrafish in a virtual reality. Brief perturbations of visuomotor feedback triggered distinct changes in swimming behavior and different neuronal responses. Neuronal activity reflecting sensorimotor mismatch, rather than sensory input or motor output alone, was prominent throughout multiple forebrain areas. This activity preceded and predicted the transition in motor behavior. Error signals were altered in specific forebrain regions by a mutation in the autism-related gene shank3b. Predictive processing is therefore a widespread phenomenon that may contribute to disease phenotypes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuwei Jiang ◽  
Misako Komatsu ◽  
Yuyan Chen ◽  
Ruoying Xie ◽  
Kaiwei Zhang ◽  
...  

Our brains constantly generate predictions of sensory input that are compared with actual inputs, propagate the prediction-errors through a hierarchy of brain regions, and subsequently update the internal predictions of the world. However, the essential feature of predictive coding, the notion of hierarchical depth and its neural mechanisms, remains largely unexplored. Here, we investigated the hierarchical depth of predictive auditory processing by combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and high-density whole-brain electrocorticography (ECoG) in marmoset monkeys during an auditory local-global paradigm in which the temporal regularities of the stimuli were designed at two hierarchical levels. The prediction-errors and prediction updates were examined as neural responses to auditory mismatches and omissions. Using fMRI, we identified a hierarchical gradient along the auditory pathway: midbrain and sensory regions represented local, short-time-scale predictive processing followed by associative auditory regions, whereas anterior temporal and prefrontal areas represented global, long-time-scale sequence processing. The complementary ECoG recordings confirmed the activations at cortical surface areas and further differentiated the signals of prediction-error and update, which were transmitted via putatively bottom-up γ and top-down β oscillations, respectively. Furthermore, omission responses caused by absence of input, reflecting solely the two levels of prediction signals that are unique to the hierarchical predictive coding framework, demonstrated the hierarchical predictions in the auditory, temporal, and prefrontal areas. Thus, our findings support the hierarchical predictive coding framework, and outline how neural circuits and spatiotemporal dynamics are used to represent and arrange a hierarchical structure of auditory sequences in the marmoset brain.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kayhan ◽  
L. Heil ◽  
J. Kwisthout ◽  
I. van Rooij ◽  
S. Hunnius ◽  
...  

AbstractFrom early on in life, children are able to use information from their environment to form predictions about events. For instance, they can use statistical information about a population to predict the sample drawn from that population and infer an agent’s preferences from systematic violations of random sampling. We investigated how young children build and update models of an agent’s sampling actions over time, and whether a computational model based on the causal Bayesian network formalization of predictive processing can explain this process.We formalized three hypotheses about how different explanatory variables (i.e., prior probabilities, current observations, and agent characteristics) are used to build predictive models of others’ actions. We measured pupillary responses as a behavioral marker of ‘prediction errors’ (i.e., the perceived mismatch between what one’s model of an agent predicts and what the agent actually does), as described in the predictive processing framework. Pupillary responses of 24-month-olds, but not 18-month-olds, showed that young children integrated information about current observations, priors and agents to generate predictive models of agents and their actions.These findings shed light on the mechanisms behind toddlers’ inferences about agent-caused events. To our knowledge, this is the first study in which young children’s pupillary responses are used as markers of prediction errors, and explained by a computational model based on the causal Bayesian network formalization of predictive processing. We argue that the predictive processing framework provides a promising explanation of the way in which young children process other persons’ actions.HighlightsWe present three formalized hypotheses on how young children generate predictive models of others’ sampling actions.We measured pupillary responses of children as a behavioral marker of prediction errors as described in the predictive processing framework.Results showed that young children integrated information about current observations, prior probabilities and agents to generate predictive models about others’ actions.A computational model based on the causal Bayesian network formalization of predictive processing can explain this process.


Author(s):  
Robert Baumgartner ◽  
Piotr Majdak

AbstractUnder natural listening conditions, humans perceptually attribute sounds to external objects in their environment. This core function of perceptual inference is often distorted when sounds are produced via hearing devices such as headphones or hearing aids, resulting in sources being perceived unrealistically close or even inside the head. Psychoacoustic studies suggest a mixed role of various cues contributing to the externalization process. We developed a model framework able to probe the contribution of cue-specific prediction errors and to contrast dynamic versus static decision strategies underlying externalization perception. The model was applied to various acoustic distortions with constant reverberation. Our results suggest that the decisions follow a static, weighted accumulation of prediction errors for both monaural and interaural spectral shapes, without a significant contribution of other auditory cues. The weighted error accumulation supports generalizability of predictive processing theory to the perceptual inference problem of spatial hearing.Impact StatementA static rather than dynamic weighting of sensory prediction errors explains the inability to attribute auditory sensations to external sound sources.


2021 ◽  
pp. 175407392110638
Author(s):  
Mark Miller ◽  
Erik Rietveld ◽  
Julian Kiverstein

We offer an account of mental health and well-being using the predictive processing framework (PPF). According to this framework, the difference between mental health and psychopathology can be located in the goodness of the predictive model as a regulator of action. What is crucial for avoiding the rigid patterns of thinking, feeling and acting associated with psychopathology is the regulation of action based on the valence of affective states. In PPF, valence is modelled as error dynamics—the change in prediction errors over time . Our aim in this paper is to show how error dynamics can account for both momentary happiness and longer term well-being. What will emerge is a new neurocomputational framework for making sense of human flourishing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Berg ◽  
Matthias Feldmann ◽  
Tobias Kube

Rumination is a widely recognized cognitive deviation in depression. An integrative view that combines clinical findings on rumination with theories of mental simulation and cognitive problem-solving could help explain the development and maintenance of rumination in a computationally and biologically plausible framework. In this review, we connect insights from neuroscience and computational psychiatry to elucidate rumination as repetitive but unsuccessful attempts at mental problem-solving. Appealing to a predictive processing account, we suggest that problem-solving is based on an algorithm that generates candidate behavior (policy primitives for problem solutions) using a Bayesian sampling approach, evaluates resulting policies for action, and then engages in instrumental learning to reduce prediction errors. We present evidence suggesting that this problem-solving algorithm is distorted in depression: Specifically, depressive rumination is regarded as excessive Bayesian sampling of candidates that is associated with high prediction errors without activation of the successive steps (policy evaluation, instrumental learning) of the algorithm. Thus, prediction errors cannot be decreased, and excessive resampling of the same problems occur. This then leads to reduced precision weighting attributed to external, “online” stimuli, low behavioral output and high opportunity costs due to the time-consuming nature of the sampling process itself. We review different computational reasons that make the proposed Bayesian sampling algorithm vulnerable to a ruminative „halting problem”. We also identify neurophysiological correlates of these deviations in pathological connectivity patterns of different brain networks. We conclude by suggesting future directions for research into behavioral and neurophysiological features of the model and point to clinical implications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2643-2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lieke Heil ◽  
Johan Kwisthout ◽  
Stan van Pelt ◽  
Iris van Rooij ◽  
Harold Bekkering

Evidence is accumulating that our brains process incoming information using top-down predictions. If lower level representations are correctly predicted by higher level representations, this enhances processing. However, if they are incorrectly predicted, additional processing is required at higher levels to “explain away” prediction errors. Here, we explored the potential nature of the models generating such predictions. More specifically, we investigated whether a predictive processing model with a hierarchical structure and causal relations between its levels is able to account for the processing of agent-caused events. In Experiment 1, participants watched animated movies of “experienced” and “novice” bowlers. The results are in line with the idea that prediction errors at a lower level of the hierarchy (i.e., the outcome of how many pins fell down) slow down reporting of information at a higher level (i.e., which agent was throwing the ball). Experiments 2 and 3 suggest that this effect is specific to situations in which the predictor is causally related to the outcome. Overall, the study supports the idea that a hierarchical predictive processing model can account for the processing of observed action outcomes and that the predictions involved are specific to cases where action outcomes can be predicted based on causal knowledge.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Kluger ◽  
Nico Broers ◽  
Marlen A. Roehe ◽  
Moritz F. Wurm ◽  
Niko A. Busch ◽  
...  

AbstractWhile prediction errors have been established to instigate learning through model adaptation, recent studies have stressed the role of model-compliant events in predictive processing. Specifically, so-called checkpoints have been suggested to be sampled for model evaluation, particularly in uncertain contexts.Using electroencephalography (EEG), the present study aimed to investigate the interplay of such global information and local adjustment cues prompting on-line adjustments of expectations. Within a stream of single digits, participants were to detect ordered sequences (i.e., 3-4-5-6-7) that had a regular length of five digits and were occasionally extended to seven digits. Across experimental blocks, these extensions were either rare (low irreducible uncertainty) or frequent (high uncertainty) and could be unexpected or indicated by incidental colour cues.Exploitation of local cue information was reflected in significant decoding of cues vs non-informative analogues using multivariate pattern classification. Modulation of checkpoint processing as a function of global uncertainty was likewise reflected in significant decoding of high vs low uncertainty checkpoints. In line with previous results, both analyses comprised the P3b time frame as an index of excess model-compliant information sampled from probabilistic events.Accounting for cue information, an N400 component was revealed as the correlate of locally unexpected (vs expected) outcomes, reflecting effortful integration of incongruous information. Finally, we compared the fit of a global model (disregarding local adjustments) and a local model (including local adjustments) using representational similarity analysis (RSA). RSA revealed a better fit for the global model, underscoring the precedence of global reference frames in hierarchical predictive processing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document