A Critical Examination of the Reliability and Validity of a Gender Role Attitude Scale in Flanders (Belgium): What Lessons Can be Learned?

Sex Roles ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 78 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 423-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Halimi ◽  
Els Consuegra ◽  
Katrien Struyven ◽  
Nadine Engels
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-576
Author(s):  
Beatriz Pérez Sánchez ◽  
Andrés Concha-Salgado ◽  
Asunción Fernández-Suárez ◽  
Joel Juarros-Basterretxea ◽  
Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Díaz

Hemos experimentado cambios socioculturales que han favorecido el desarrollo de actitudes de roles de género (GRA) más igualitarias. Sin embargo, actualmente la revolución en los roles de género está incompleta y la falta de equidad en las estructuras sociales limita las experiencias individuales en igualdad. Ante esta realidad, la comunidad científica exige un sistema modernizado para medir GRA. Presentamos adaptación, evidencia de validez factorial y convergente, precisión, efecto techo y piso, normas de interpretación por sexo, y análisis del GRA más fácil y difícil de modificar, para la Escala de Actitudes de Rol de Género (EARG) en muestra de 1013 universitarios chilenos. La EARG tiene una estructura bifactorial que evalúa actitudes estereotipadas y trascendentes en contextos familiares, sociales y laborales. Presenta validez convergente con una medida de doble estándar sexual y es más confiable en puntajes bajos de trascendencia y puntajes altos de actitudes estereotipadas. El factor trascendente tuvo un efecto techo, y las actitudes estereotipadas un efecto suelo. Los roles familiares de género son los más fáciles de cambiar, y los relacionados con el trabajo los más difíciles. Se discute la necesidad de un cambio estructural para reactivar la revolución de los roles de género en Chile. We have experienced sociocultural changes, which have favoured the development of egalitarian gender role attitudes (GRA). Nevertheless, the revolution in gender roles is incomplete, and the lack of equity in social structures limits the individual experiences in equality. In the face of this reality, the scientific community is demanding a modernised system for measuring GRA. We present adaptation, evidence of factorial and convergent validity, accuracy, ceiling and floor effect, norms of interpretation by sex, and analyses of the GRA easiest or most difficult to modify, for the Gender Role Attitudes Scale (GRAS) in a sample of 1013 Chilean university students. The GRAS has a two-factor structure that allows the evaluation of stereotyped and transcendent attitudes of gender roles in family, social, and work contexts. The scale presents convergent validity with a sexual double standard measure and is more reliable in the low scores of transcendence and the high scores of stereotyped attitudes. Transcendent factor had a ceiling effect, and stereotyped attitudes had a floor effect. Family gender roles are the easiest to change, and work-related roles the most difficult. The authors discuss the need for a structural change to reactivate the revolution of gender roles in Chile.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (09) ◽  
pp. 573-589
Author(s):  
Swagata Chattopadhyay

Social norms and roles can affect our behavior and intrude on our alternatives. On the flip, that has an impact on and strain to comply may be constraining, specifically for individuals and personal goals for individuals who are much less aligned with the norms and roles of the one. Throughout the college years, a person socializing will increase to plenty volume. Chances of having a romantic relationship increase in those years of lifestyle. Exploring and being curious approximately the opposite genders and the eagerness to be in a courting with the alternative gender boom at its height So, conventional roles can also make it more difficult for a few individuals to proportion their precise characteristics, live true to their personal socio-sexual preferences, and self-decide their conduct in relationships. Provided that those man or woman possibilities and behaviors are crit for enjoyable relationships is usually uncertain as to whether or not following conventional norms and roles of masculinity and femininity ultimately helps or hurts a relationship. Gender role attitude here refers to the beliefs held by individuals towards any specific gender as measured by the Gender Role Attitude Scale (GRAS). The instrument was developed by Prof. Dr. Simge Zeyneloölu to determine attitudes towards gender roles. Another scale used was Romantic partner conflict which refers to the everyday conflicts faced by individuals in relationships and how they handle the conflict. The scale was introduced by Tammy L. Zacchill, purpose of this scale is to measure conflict experienced by individuals in romantic relationships. The study aims at seeing the relationship between gender role attitudes and romantic partner conflict among males.


Author(s):  
Vera Lomazzi

This study provides a critical evaluation of the gender role attitude scale included in the fourth wave of the European Values Study. The goodness of this scale is tested considering first of all its reliability and the stability of the factorial structure. The results suggest caution in the use of this instrument: the scale presents a deep variation in reliability across countries and its configuration is not stable, displaying several different factor structures from one country to another. In considering the source of this instability, this study addresses a priming effect due to questions introduced in 2008 immediately prior to the use of the gender role attitudes scale that modified the context of response.


Author(s):  
Gladys Merma-Molina ◽  
Diego Gavilán-Martín ◽  
David Molina Motos ◽  
Mayra Urrea-Solano

INTRODUCCIÓN. El sexismo y la violencia de género son problemáticas sociales graves. Los objetivos del estudio son: 1) analizar los estereotipos y roles de género, en los comportamientos de los adolescentes, que permean en las actitudes sexistas e 2) identificar posibles relaciones entre la auto-atribución de roles de género y las actitudes sexistas. MÉTODO. Se diseñó un estudio de corte transversal. Participaron 1508 adolescentes. La media de distribución de edades fue de M=14.83. Se utilizaron dos instrumentos: la Traditional Masculinity-Femininity Scale y el cuestionario Gender Role Attitude Scale. RESULTADOS. 1) Los y las adolescentes adoptan roles típicamente masculinos y femeninos, y prevalece la autoidentificación masculina y hegemónica, 2) hay una concentración de roles más estereotipados masculinos y femeninos en la adolescencia temprana, 3) existen diferencias en la autoatribución de los roles de género en función de los estudios de los progenitores, 4) El análisis de la dispersión muestra que los hombres son más sexistas y el análisis de regresión confirma que los roles de género tradicionales incrementan el riesgo de actitudes sexistas. DISCUSIÓN. Se concluye que hay un nivel medio de sexismo, siendo los adolescentes más sexistas que las adolescentes. La masculinidad, tradicionalmente entendida, es más sexista en sus actitudes hacia la igualdad de roles que la feminidad. La influencia de las madres en el desarrollo de la identidad de género es menor y los padres son un factor predictivo de los roles de género de los adolescentes. Hay una correlación positiva entre la autoatribución de roles de género tradicionales y las actitudes sexistas, por lo que dichos roles aumentan el riesgo de estas actitudes. Para prevenir estas actitudes, se propone una escuela virtual de padres y madres que fomente la educación igualitaria y sin estereotipos de género en el hogar.


2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Maria Iliadou ◽  
Katerina Lykeridou ◽  
Panagiotis Prezerakos ◽  
Chara Tzavara ◽  
Styliani Tziaferi

1993 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Paul Coen ◽  
Benjamin M. Ogles

Several aspects of obligatory running are examined with particular emphasis on the anorexia analogue hypothesis. The psychometric characteristics of the Obligatory Exercise Questionnaire were examined in a preliminary study. The OEQ is unrelated to socially desirable responding and has adequate reliability and validity. Data were collected from a second sample to identify obligatory and nonobligatory runners. Validation of the obligatory construct is examined by comparing demographic and training differences between obligatory and nonobligatory runners. Obligatory runners train more miles, days, and hours per week; have faster finishing times; are more likely to continue running when injured; and report feeling higher levels of anxiety when not running. The anorexia analogue hypothesis is examined by comparing the personality characteristics of obligatory and nonobligatory male marathon runners. Obligatory and nonobligatory runners were not significantly different on measures of identity diffusion or trait anger. They were significantly different on measures of perfectionism and trait anxiety.


2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 362-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyuki Tajima ◽  
Tsuyoshi Akiyama ◽  
Hatsue Numa ◽  
Yoshiya Kawamura ◽  
Yoshie Okada ◽  
...  

Background:The 24-item Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS-24) is a short version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, which is a self-report inventory for depressogenic schemata.Objective:The object of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the DAS-24 (DAS-24-J).Methods:Subjects consisted of non-clinical sample 1 (248 university students), non-clinical sample 2 (872 Japanese company employees) and a clinical sample (59 depressed out-patients).Results:Internal consistency was satisfactory in all three samples, Cronbach’s α coefficient being higher than 0.85. Test–retest reliability was satisfactory in non-clinical sample 1. The interclass correlation coefficient was 0.79 and there was no significant difference in the average score of DAS-24-J between the two points. The DAS-24-J showed satisfactory concurrent validity with the Japanese Irrational Belief Test-20 (r= 0.76); Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire – Revised total (r= 0.46), negative (r= 0.53) and positive (r=−0.41); and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (r= 0.44 for non-clinical sample, r= 0.63 for clinical sample). The clinical sample showed a significantly higher DAS-24-J score than non-clinical sample 2. According to a factor analysis combining all three samples, three factors were extracted: factor 1 (11 items) corresponded with ‘achievement’ in the original version, factor 2 (6 items) with ‘self-control’ and factor 3 (5 items) with ‘dependency’.Conclusion:The DAS-24-J is a reliable and valid instrument to measure depressogenic schemata in Japanese.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document