scholarly journals Effects of land use and cultivation time on soil organic and inorganic carbon storage in deep soils

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 921-934
Author(s):  
Xia Yu ◽  
Weijian Zhou ◽  
Yunqiang Wang ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Yaoyao Hou ◽  
...  
Geoderma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 353 ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui An ◽  
Xiuzhi Wu ◽  
Yarou Zhang ◽  
Zhuangsheng Tang

Ecosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e02655 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Huber ◽  
Kathleen A. Lohse ◽  
Amy Commendador ◽  
Stephen Joy ◽  
Ken Aho ◽  
...  

CATENA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 345-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunli Li ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Liang Zhao ◽  
Shidong Ge ◽  
Dongdong Chen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M.F. Rabbi ◽  
Matthew Tighe ◽  
Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo ◽  
Annette Cowie ◽  
Fiona Robertson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1794) ◽  
pp. 20190189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Molotoks ◽  
Roslyn Henry ◽  
Elke Stehfest ◽  
Jonathan Doelman ◽  
Petr Havlik ◽  
...  

Land-use change is a direct driver of biodiversity and carbon storage loss. Projections of future land use often include notable expansion of cropland areas in response to changes in climate and food demand, although there are large uncertainties in results between models and scenarios. This study examines these uncertainties by comparing three different socio-economic scenarios (SSP1–3) across three models (IMAGE, GLOBIOM and PLUMv2). It assesses the impacts on biodiversity metrics and direct carbon loss from biomass and soil as a direct consequence of cropland expansion. Results show substantial variation between models and scenarios, with little overlap across all nine projections. Although SSP1 projects the least impact, there are still significant impacts projected. IMAGE and GLOBIOM project the greatest impact across carbon storage and biodiversity metrics due to both extent and location of cropland expansion. Furthermore, for all the biodiversity and carbon metrics used, there is a greater proportion of variance explained by the model used. This demonstrates the importance of improving the accuracy of land-based models. Incorporating effects of land-use change in biodiversity impact assessments would also help better prioritize future protection of biodiverse and carbon-rich areas. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions’.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (18) ◽  
pp. 6859-6881 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Brovkin ◽  
L. Boysen ◽  
V. K. Arora ◽  
J. P. Boisier ◽  
P. Cadule ◽  
...  

Abstract The effects of land-use changes on climate are assessed using specified-concentration simulations complementary to the representative concentration pathway 2.6 (RCP2.6) and RCP8.5 scenarios performed for phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). This analysis focuses on differences in climate and land–atmosphere fluxes between the ensemble averages of simulations with and without land-use changes by the end of the twenty-first century. Even though common land-use scenarios are used, the areas of crops and pastures are specific for each Earth system model (ESM). This is due to different interpretations of land-use classes. The analysis reveals that fossil fuel forcing dominates land-use forcing. In addition, the effects of land-use changes are globally not significant, whereas they are significant for regions with land-use changes exceeding 10%. For these regions, three out of six participating models—the Second Generation Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2); Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model, version 2 (Earth System) (HadGEM2-ES); and Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate, Earth System Model (MIROC-ESM)—reveal statistically significant changes in mean annual surface air temperature. In addition, changes in land surface albedo, available energy, and latent heat fluxes are small but significant for most ESMs in regions affected by land-use changes. These climatic effects are relatively small, as land-use changes in the RCP2.6 and RCP8.5 scenarios are small in magnitude and mainly limited to tropical and subtropical regions. The relative importance of the climatic effects of land-use changes is higher for the RCP2.6 scenario, which considers an expansion of biofuel croplands as a climate mitigation option. The underlying similarity among all models is the loss in global land carbon storage due to land-use changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document