scholarly journals Perspectives of Frontline Professionals on Palestinian Children Living with Sibling and Parental Drug Use in the UNRWA Camps, Jordan

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1620-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayyada Wazaify ◽  
Leen Abushams ◽  
Mohammed Al-Afifi ◽  
Stephanie Kewley ◽  
Zara Quigg ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1097-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al-Afifi ◽  
Leen Abushams ◽  
Mazen Sakka ◽  
Maha Shehada ◽  
Riad Afifi ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora S. Gustavsson ◽  
Ann E. MacEachron

Legal precedent for criminalizing the behavior of pregnant women has been established in an attempt to protect the fetus. Elevating fetal rights over maternal rights is based on questionable assumptions and inconclusive medical evidence. These criminalization policies are sexist and serve to victimize poor, pregnant women. This paper examines the evidence and policies and suggests an alternative policy approach to dealing with families with parental drug use issues.


1973 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack McKillip ◽  
James E. Johnson ◽  
Thomas P. Petzel

A drug-use survey was administered in a large metropolitan, middle class high school to test two hypotheses: a. drug users can be divided according to the types of drugs used (tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana vs. opiates, LSD, amphetamines, etc.); and, b. respondents' drug use is significantly related to their peers drug use. Both hypotheses were supported. Reports of personal drug use were factor analyzed dividing drug use into two categories. Intercorrelations of students' own drug use with reported parental, sibling, and peer drug use all revealed significant relationships. Peer drug use correlated the highest, followed by sibling and parental drug use. A number of implications of these results for the organization of high school drug programs and for counseling drug users were discussed.


1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis G. Fisher ◽  
David P. MacKinnon ◽  
M. Douglas Anglin ◽  
John P. Thompson

The relationship between perceived parental drug use and offspring drug use was investigated. The subjects, 106 UCLA undergraduates, were evenly divided between psychoactive mushroom users and nonusers who completed a questionnaire regarding social and subjective aspects of drug use, including parental drug use. The data were analyzed using modern psychometric scaling techniques, including multidimensional unfolding and principal component analysis of qualitative variables (PRINQUAL). These techniques are advocated as preferable to discriminant analysis when variables, such as perceived parental use of different drugs, are highly correlated. Men's use of drugs was relatively independent of perceived parental drug use while women's use of drugs was strongly related to perceived parental usage. Guttman scaling and PRINQUAL analysis of the types of drugs indicate that the use of cocaine has changed since Kandel and Faust suggested the stage theory of adolescent drug use and that cocaine use has developed patterns similar to marijuana use.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-187
Author(s):  
Anne Whittaker ◽  
Fiona Martin ◽  
Anna Olsen ◽  
Emma Wincup

In 2003, the UK Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs published Hidden Harm, the product of an inquiry that exposed the “problems” of parental drug use and its neglect by professionals. It outlined an extensive program of reforms designed to protect children from harm. Despite its far-reaching influence, it has rarely been subject to scrutiny, with analyses focusing on its impact instead. Drawing on Bacchi’s post-structuralist “What’s the Problem Represented to be” approach, we examine problematizations within Hidden Harm and their implications for the governance of family life. We illustrate how Hidden Harm produced a simplified version of parenting and child welfare within the context of drug use by largely equating drug use with “bad” parenting and child maltreatment and by ignoring the social determinants of health and the wider social ecology of family life. Using a tried-and-tested driver of policy change, Hidden Harm created a “scandal” about the lack of intervention by professionals that was used to justify and legitimize increased state intervention into the lives of parents who use drugs. Hidden Harm proposed simplistic “solutions” that centered on drug treatment, child protection and the responsibilization of professionals to govern “risky” parents. We argue these rationalities, subjectivities and strategies serve to marginalize and stigmatize families further and hide alternative approaches to understanding, representing and responding to the complex needs of children and families who are disproportionately affected by health and social inequalities. By uncovering what is hidden in Hidden Harm, we aim to stimulate further research and theoretically informed debate about policy and practice related to child welfare, parenting and family life within the context of drug use. We conclude with some ideas about how to reframe public discourse on parents who use drugs and their children, in tandem with collaborative responses to alleviate child poverty and inequalities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. S33-S34
Author(s):  
Asari Offiong ◽  
Terrinieka Powell ◽  
Quiana Lewis ◽  
Bianca Smith ◽  
Morgan Prioleau

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Ainsworth

This article focuses on parental drug use and the impact on child welfare. The gravity of this issue is well documented in a number of reports from government and in annual reports from relevant state and territory departments. Yet, there has been little attention to this issue in Australian journals in spite of the fact that this is probably the most critical issue child protection services have had to face for two decades or more. Parental drug use is almost certainly responsible for the rise in the number of children, especially young children, entering out-of-home care. Drug use also creates issues in relation to family reunification. The final part of the article proposes an enhanced three stage model of family reunification that addresses these issues. This model is based on greater collaboration between child protection services, drug treatment agencies, and the legal system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 302
Author(s):  
Guan Wang ◽  
Wenquan Niu
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 174 (3) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Vineet Pasam Reddy ◽  
Abhimanyu S. Ahuja
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document