UCP2 and PLIN1 Expression Affects the Resting Metabolic Rate and Weight Loss on Obese Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Affonso Parenti de Oliveira ◽  
Marcela Augusta de Souza Pinhel ◽  
Carolina Ferreira Nicoletti ◽  
Cristiana Cortes de Oliveira ◽  
Driele Cristina Gomes Quinhoneiro ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Menozzi ◽  
M. Bondi ◽  
A. Baldini ◽  
M. G. Venneri ◽  
A. Velardo ◽  
...  

The reduction in resting metabolic rate (RMR) during weight loss exceeds that accounted for by changes in body composition by 15%, suggesting that factors other than fat-free mass (FFM) explain the metabolic adaptation during food restriction in obesity. Our study aimed to establish if changes in the sympathoadrenal system activity, as inferred from an integrated measure such as 24 h urinary excretion of catecholamines, may play a role in the RMR adaptation observed during dietary restriction in obese patients. Ninety-three obese female subjects consumed a low-energy diet (LED) (2930 kJ/d (700 kcal/d)) for a 3-week period. At the beginning and at the end of the study, 24 h urinary excretion of catecholamines, FFM and RMR were measured. The LED induced a significant reduction in body weight (-3·3 (SEM 0·4) KG; P < 0·01), FFM (-1·9 (sem 0·7) kg; P < 0·01) and in the fat mass (-1·2 (sem 0·5) kg; P < 0·01). Noradrenalin excretion (24 h) decreased during the LED from 264 (sem 26) during a weight-maintenance period to 171 (sem 19) nmol/24 h after consumption of the LED for 3 weeks (P < 0·001); mean 24 h adrenalin excretion did not change during the LED (22 (sem 3) during the weight-maintenance period v. 21 (sem 3) nmol/24 h after consumption of the LED for 3 weeks; NS). The LED induced a significant decrease in RMR (7300 (sem 218) v. 6831 (sem 138) kJ/24 h; P < 0·001). The only independent variable that significantly explained variations in RMR both before and after consumption of the LED for 3 weeks, was FFM (r2 0·79 and r2 0·80 respectively). Urinary noradrenalin excretion explained a further 4 % of the variability in RMR, but only before the diet, so that a role of sympathoadrenal system on RMR seems to be present in obese patients in basal conditions but not at the end of the LED.


1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merril L. Durrant ◽  
J. S. Garrow ◽  
P. Royston ◽  
Susan F. Stalley ◽  
Shirley Sunkin ◽  
...  

1.Weight loss, resting metabolic rate and nitrogen loss were measured in forty obese inpatients on reducing diets.2. Five subjects ate 3·55 MJ/d for 6 weeks (Expt I). Twenty-one subjects ate 4.2 MJ/d for the first week, 2·0 MJ/d for the second week and 4 2 MJ/d for the third week (Expt 2). Fourteen subjects ate 3·4 MJ/d for the first week and then 0.87 MJ protein or carbohydrate for the second or third weeks, using a cross-over design for alternate patients (Expt 3).3. Patients in Expt I had highest weight loss and N loss in the first 2 weeks, but adapted to the energy restriction over the remaining weeks. On average subjects were in N balance at the end of the study.4. In Expt 2 patients eating 2·0 MJ/d in week 2 showed increased weight loss compared with week I.N loss was not raised but it failed to decrease as it had in Expt I. Weight loss and N loss were reduced on return to 4.2 MJ/d for a third week.5. In Expt 3 patients eating 0·87 MJ protein showed significantly more weight loss and less N loss than patients eating 0·87 MJ carbohydrate.6. Resting metabolic rate decreased with time on the low-energy diet, but the manipulations of energy or protein content did not significantly affect the pattern of decrease.7. Both weight loss and N loss were greater the lower the energy intake, and both decreased with time. Diets with a high protein:energy value give a favourable value for N:weight loss at each level of energy intake.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 1347-1355
Author(s):  
Vikrant P. Rachakonda ◽  
James P. DeLany ◽  
Erin E. Kershaw ◽  
Jaideep Behari

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. G. Christensen ◽  
L. Raiber ◽  
S. Wharton ◽  
M. A. Rotondi ◽  
J. L. Kuk

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Horswill

Amateur wrestlers practice weight loss for ergogenic reasons. The effects of rapid weight loss on aerobic performance are adverse and profound, but the effects on anaerobic performance are equivocal Anaerobic performance—strength and power—may be the most relevant type of performance to the wrestler. Maintenance of or even small decrements in anaerobic performance may translate into improvements in performance relative to the weight class, the factor by which wrestlers are matched for competition. During the recovery period between the official weigh-in and competition, wrestlers achieve at least partial nutritional recovery, which appears to benefit performance. Successive bouts of (a) weight loss to make weight and (b) recovery for performance lead to weight cycling. There is speculation that weight cycling may contribute to chronic glycogen depletion, reductions in fat-free weight, a decrease in resting metabolic rate, and an increase in body fat. The latter two would augment the difficulty of losing weight for subsequent weigh-ins. Most research indicates that the suppressed resting metabolic rate with weight loss in wrestlers appears to be transient, but subsequent research is needed for confirmation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Gomez-Arbelaez ◽  
Ana B. Crujeiras ◽  
Ana I. Castro ◽  
Miguel A. Martinez-Olmos ◽  
Ana Canton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document