Relationship Between Modified Body Adiposity Index and A Body Shape Index with Biochemical Parameters in Bariatric Surgery Candidates

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 901-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negar Zamaninour ◽  
Hastimansooreh Ansar ◽  
Abdolreza Pazouki ◽  
Ali Kabir
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1966-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Consalvo ◽  
Jesse C. Krakauer ◽  
Nir Y. Krakauer ◽  
Antonio Canero ◽  
Mafalda Romano ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m3324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jayedi ◽  
Sepideh Soltani ◽  
Mahdieh Sadat Zargar ◽  
Tauseef Ahmad Khan ◽  
Sakineh Shab-Bidar

AbstractObjectiveTo quantify the association of indices of central obesity, including waist circumference, hip circumference, thigh circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, waist-to-thigh ratio, body adiposity index, and A body shape index, with the risk of all cause mortality in the general population, and to clarify the shape of the dose-response relations.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed and Scopus from inception to July 2019, and the reference lists of all related articles and reviews.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesProspective cohort studies reporting the risk estimates of all cause mortality across at least three categories of indices of central fatness. Studies that reported continuous estimation of the associations were also included.Data synthesisA random effects dose-response meta-analysis was conducted to assess linear trend estimations. A one stage linear mixed effects meta-analysis was used for estimating dose-response curves.ResultsOf 98 745 studies screened, 1950 full texts were fully reviewed for eligibility. The final analyses consisted of 72 prospective cohort studies with 2 528 297 participants. The summary hazard ratios were as follows: waist circumference (10 cm, 3.94 inch increase): 1.11 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.13, I2=88%, n=50); hip circumference (10 cm, 3.94 inch increase): 0.90 (0.81 to 0.99, I2=95%, n=9); thigh circumference (5 cm, 1.97 inch increase): 0.82 (0.75 to 0.89, I2=54%, n=3); waist-to-hip ratio (0.1 unit increase): 1.20 (1.15 to 1.25, I2=90%, n=31); waist-to-height ratio (0.1 unit increase): 1.24 (1.12 to 1.36, I2=94%, n=11); waist-to-thigh ratio (0.1 unit increase): 1.21 (1.03 to 1.39, I2=97%, n=2); body adiposity index (10% increase): 1.17 (1.00 to 1.33, I2=75%, n=4); and A body shape index (0.005 unit increase): 1.15 (1.10 to 1.20, I2=87%, n=9). Positive associations persisted after accounting for body mass index. A nearly J shaped association was found between waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio and the risk of all cause mortality in men and women. A positive monotonic association was observed for waist-to-hip ratio and A body shape index. The association was U shaped for body adiposity index.ConclusionsIndices of central fatness including waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, waist-to-thigh ratio, body adiposity index, and A body shape index, independent of overall adiposity, were positively and significantly associated with a higher all cause mortality risk. Larger hip circumference and thigh circumference were associated with a lower risk. The results suggest that measures of central adiposity could be used with body mass index as a supplementary approach to determine the risk of premature death.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey C. Kabat ◽  
Xiaonan Xue ◽  
Victor Kamensky ◽  
Dorothy Lane ◽  
Jennifer W. Bea ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Gomez-Peralta ◽  
Cristina Abreu ◽  
Margarita Cruz-Bravo ◽  
Elvira Alcarria ◽  
Gala Gutierrez-Buey ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 1117-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael V. Fedewa ◽  
Angela R. Russell ◽  
Brett S. Nickerson ◽  
Megan P. Fedewa ◽  
John W. Myrick ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-139
Author(s):  
Mariana De Santis Filgueiras ◽  
Roberta Stofeles Cecon ◽  
Eliane Rodrigues de Faria ◽  
Franciane Rocha de Faria ◽  
Patrícia Feliciano Pereira ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate agreement of the body adiposity index (BAI) and paediatric body adiposity index (BAIp) in estimating body fat compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to propose cut-off points for these indices to classify excess adiposity in Brazilian children and adolescents.DesignCross-sectional study. Measures of weight, height, hip circumference, BMI and body fat percentage (%BF) assessed by DXA were taken, and BAI and BAIp were calculated. The Bland–Altman plot was used to estimate agreement between the methods, and the receiver-operating characteristic curve to determine the cut-off points for BAI and BAIp per age and sex in comparison with DXA.SettingViçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.SubjectsChildren and adolescents aged 8–19 years (n 1049).ResultsOf the children and adolescents, 52·4 % were girls. BAI and BAIp had satisfactory performance by the receiver-operating characteristic curve, except for the 18–19 years age group, whose BAIp had better predictive capacity than BAI. The agreement analysis showed that BAI overestimated %BF by 2·64 %, on average, using DXA; while BAIp underestimated %BF by 3·37 %.ConclusionsBAI and BAIp showed low agreement with the body fat obtained by DXA, requiring caution when interpreting body composition data in children and adolescents.


2013 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe-Qing Zhang ◽  
Yan-Hua Liu ◽  
Ying Xu ◽  
Xiao-Wei Dai ◽  
Wen-hua Ling ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document