The impact of the AirSeal® valve-less trocar system in robotic colorectal surgery: a single-surgeon retrospective review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie Osborne Paull ◽  
Salvatore A. Parsacandola ◽  
Ada Graham ◽  
Salini Hota ◽  
Natalie Pudalov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
The Impact

The impact of body mass index on outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery: a single-centre experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enda Hannan ◽  
Amanda Troy ◽  
Gerard Feeney ◽  
Mohammad Fahad Ullah ◽  
Claire Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals AB016. SOH21AS074. The impact of body mass index on outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery: a single centre experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. AB016-AB016
Author(s):  
Amanda Troy ◽  
Enda Hannan ◽  
Patrick Corcoran ◽  
Gerard Feeney ◽  
Fahad Ullah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals IMPACT OF LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY ON BODY IMAGE

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Fernández Candela ◽  
L Sánchez-Guillén ◽  
L García Catalá ◽  
C Curtis Martínez ◽  
M Bosch Ramírez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Image ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Wound Complication ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Body Image Scale ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Observational Descriptive Study

Abstract INTRODUCTION The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) on body image using the validated Body Image Scale (BIS) as a parameter of surgical quality. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted an observational descriptive study. Patients who underwent scheduled LCS between June 2015 and December 2019 by a General Hospital Coloproctology Unit were included. RESULTS The sample included 180 patients, 115 men (63.9%) and 65 women (36.1%) with a median age of 67 years. Right hemicolectomies (31.7%) and sigmoidectomies (28.3%) were the main procedures performed. In most patients, a suprapubic (69.4%) or transverse (19.4%) incision was made. 21.9% suffered some type of postoperative complication (13.9% wound complication, 10.6% incisional hernia). The general result of the BIS questionnaire was satisfactory, with a median of 0 in the responses (no alteration of body image). We found that 46.2% of the women had some alteration in body image, compared to 28.7% of the men (p = 0.018) and low and ultra-low anterior resection were the surgeries that obtained worst scores, with 13,5% and 12,5% respectively of patients with a BIS score above 5 (p = 0.044). Patients with a stoma also obtained worst punctuation (25% above 5 vs 6,1%, p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found regarding type of incision, presence of complications and anxiety or depression. CONCLUSION Study results show, in general, good post-surgical body image after LCS. However, patients with stoma and women were more dissatisfied. Interestingly, there is no worse body image due to type of incision, so we recommend the least iatrogenic one.

617 Who Benefits the Most from Burn Camps?

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S162-S163
Author(s):  
Jennifer B Radics-Johnson ◽  
Daniel W Chacon ◽  
Li Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
P Value ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Return Home ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Burn camps provide a unique environment and activities for children that have experienced a burn-injury. Positive outcomes from attending burn camp include increased self-esteem, decreased feelings of isolation and a greater sense of self-confidence. In a 3-year retrospective review of camper evaluations from one of the largest and longest running week-long burn camps in the nation for ages 5–17, we aimed to assess if a child’s gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity affected the impact that burn camp had on a child. Methods A 3-year retrospective review of a Burn Camp’s camper evaluation forms was conducted for campers that attended burn camp between 2017–2019. Camp rosters were reviewed to determine the camper gender, age, TBSA and ethnicity. Camper self-evaluation forms completed at the end of each camp session were reviewed to record camper responses to questions regarding their opinions on the impact camp had on them as well as how camp will impact their lives once they return home. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage, and continuous variables were described as median and range. To check the relationship between two categorical variables, Chi-square test was used. To compare the continuous variable among groups, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used. Statistical significance was declared based on a p value< 0.5. Results Within 2017–2019, there were 413 camper records. Participants’ demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 208 males (50.3%) and 205 females (49.6%). The median age of campers were 11.86, 12.44 and 12.45 for 2017–2019, with the range from 5.16 years to 17.96 years. The median TBSA were 20, 20 and 18 for 2017–2019, with the range from 0.08 to 90. Collectively there were 47.7% Hispanic (n= 197); 24.2% Whites (n=100); 13.1% Black (n= 54); 4.6% Asian (n=19) and 7.7% Other (n=32). There were 395 camper self-evaluation forms submitted. Results of three questions there we were interested in are summarized collectively in Table 2. 57% of campers responded, “Yes, Definitely” to the question “After going to this event, will you feel more comfortable being around your classmates or friends?” 54% responded, “ Yes, Definitely” to the question “Do you feel more confidents in sharing your burn story with others when returning home?” and 51% responded “Yes, Definitely” to “Did you learn anything that will help you when you return home?” Conclusions In analyzing the camper responses, there was no statistically significant difference in responses comparing gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity.

Robotic colorectal surgery in Australia: evolution over a decade

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Tomás Larach ◽  
Julie Flynn ◽  
Joseph Kong ◽  
Peadar S. Waters ◽  
Jacob J. McCormick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery

The impact of standard postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines on racial differences in opioid prescribing: A retrospective review

Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua N. Herb ◽  
Brittney M. Williams ◽  
Kevin A. Chen ◽  
Jessica C. Young ◽  
Brooke A. Chidgey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Racial Differences ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Robotic colorectal surgery: more than a fantastic toy?

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W.T. Toh ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Seon-Hahn Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Da Vinci Surgical System ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Rectal Cancer Surgery ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Robotic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

AbstractThere has been a rapid rise in the number of robotic colorectal procedures worldwide since the da Vinci Surgical System robotic technology was approved for surgical procedures in the year 2000. Several recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown a significant difference in outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, these results from pooled data have not been supported by the initial results reported from the Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic assisted resection for rectal cancer trial. In this article, we examine the current evidence for robotic colorectal surgery, assess its features and functionality, evaluate its learning curve and provide our perspective on its future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document