The Italian Society of Internal Medicine choosing wisely campaign

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1125-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Montano ◽  
Giorgio Costantino ◽  
Giovanni Casazza ◽  
Rodolfo Sbrojavacca ◽  
Marco Vincenzo Lenti ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-194
Author(s):  
Caterina Delcea ◽  
Camelia Badea ◽  
Ciprian Jurcut ◽  
Adrian Purcarea ◽  
Silvia Sovaila ◽  
...  

Abstract Quality of care in medicine is not necessarily proportional to quantity of care and excess is often useless or even more, potentially detrimental to our patients. Adhering to the European Federation of Internal Medicine’s initiative, the Romanian Society of Internal Medicine (SRMI) launched the Choosing Wisely in Internal Medicine Campaign, aiming to cut down diagnostic procedures or therapeutics overused in our country. A Working Group was formed and from 200 published recommendations from previous international campaigns, 36 were voted as most important. These were submitted for voting to the members of the SRMI and posted on a social media platform. After the two voting rounds, the top six recommendations were established. These were: 1. Stop medicines when no further benefit is achieved or the potential harms outweigh the potential benefits for the individual patient. 2. Don’t use antibiotics in patients with recent C. difficile without convincing evidence of need. 3. Don’t regularly prescribe bed rest and inactivity following injury and/or illness unless there is scientific evidence that harm will result from activity. Promote early mobilization. 4. Don’t initiate an antibiotic without an identified indication and a predetermined length of treatment or review date. 5. Don’t prescribe opioids for treatment of chronic or acute pain for sensitive jobs such as operating motor vehicles, forklifts, cranes or other heavy equipment. 6. Transfuse red cells for anemia only if the hemoglobin concentration is less than 7 g/dL or if the patient is hemodynamically unstable or has significant cardiovascular or respiratory comorbidity. Don’t transfuse more units of blood than absolutely necessary.


Author(s):  
Mitch Levine

The Choosing Wisely Canada program is intended to facilitate the more efficient use of health care resources. The program has messages for patients to align their expectations with an evidence based delivery of health care and to increase physician knowledge regarding evidence based directives for the appropriate use of investigations and treatments. In the current issue of CJGIM, an assessment was conducted regarding physician knowledge of the program, and the message was not positive. While many physicians acknowledged awareness of the Choosing Wisely Canada program, an appreciation of the specific messages on how to steer practice to evidence based activity was lacking amongst many. As these were the 33% who agreed to participate in the survey, one can only wonder whether a greater lack of knowledge about the program resides in the 67% that refused to participate. Despite having just laid a foundation of pessimism, I still wonder whether physicians are practicing evidence-based health care even if they do not know the detailed recommendations provided by the Choosing Wisely Canada program. The array of recommendations was developed by professional societies representing different clinical specialties in Canada. The Canadian Society of Internal Medicine (CSIM) established its Choosing Wisely Canada Top 5 recommendations by convening a Committee of 20 members that represented a diverse group of general internists from across Canada, reflecting a broad range of geographical regions, practice settings, institution types and experience.1 Below is the list of the five most recent recommendations targeted for physicians practicing in the field of internal medicine. Don’t routinely obtain neuro-imaging studies (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or carotid Doppler) in the evaluation of simple syncope in patients with a normal neurological examination.Don’t place, or leave in place, urinary catheters without an acceptable indication (such as critical illness, obstruction, palliative care).Don’t transfuse red blood cells for arbitrary hemoglobin or hematocrit thresholds in the absence of symptoms, active coronary disease, heart failure, or stroke.In the inpatient setting, don’t order repeated CBC and chemistry testing in the face of clinical and lab stability.Don’t routinely perform preoperative testing (such as chest X-rays, echocardiograms, or cardiac stress tests) for patients undergoing low risk surgeries.So, how are you doing in your practice? Mitchell LevineEditor, CJGIM


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo De Giorgi ◽  
Fabio Fabbian ◽  
Marco Pala ◽  
Roberto Manfredini ◽  
Raffaella Salmi

2022 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e4222
Author(s):  
Marco Bobbio ◽  
Sandra Vernero ◽  
Domenico Colimberti ◽  
Andrea Gardini

Choosing Wisely® is an initiative of the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation to help physicians and patients engage in conversations about the overuse of tests and procedures and support physician efforts to help patients make smart and effective care choices. Choosing Wisely campaigns are now active and present in 25 countries around the world, on five continents. Italy is the only country where a Choosing Wisely campaign was launched, and it is currently steered by a Nationwide association (Slow Medicine), creating a synergistic alliance. The Slow Medicine Association was founded in 2011 when a group of health professionals and citizens shared a new paradigm of values, methodology, and interventions and decided to establish an association with the mission of working for a health system driven by ethics and quality principles. Three keywords summarize the philosophy of Slow Medicine: measured because it acts with moderation, gradualness, and without waste; respectful because it is attentive to the dignity of individuals recognizing their values; and equitable because it is committed to ensuring appropriate care based on the best available evidence. Slow Medicine allowed the spread of Choosing Wisely in Italy involving several professional societies and participating at the National meetings of the Societies as well as numerous other meetings, in which the mission of the Association is combined with the principle of the ‘do not’ recommendations. Numerous other initiatives were carried out, and new projects were planned in synergy with Choosing Wisely.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Heffler ◽  
Massimo Landi ◽  
Silvana Quadrino ◽  
Cristoforo Incorvaia ◽  
Stefano Pizzimenti ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0197414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariela L. Marshall ◽  
Sarah Jenkins ◽  
Amy S. Oxentenko ◽  
Alfred I. Lee ◽  
Mark D. Siegel ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 476-477
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Sbrojavacca ◽  
Antonello Pietrangelo ◽  
Luigi Fenoglio ◽  
Francesco Violi ◽  
Francesco Perticone ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEONARD M. FLECK

Abstract:The American College of Physicians in its ethics manual endorsed the idea that physicians ought to improve their ability to provide care to their patients more parsimoniously. This elicited a critical backlash; critics essentially claimed that what was being endorsed was a renamed form of rationing. In a recent article, Tilburt and Cassel argued that parsimonious care and rationing are ethically distinct practices. In this essay I critically assess that claim. I argue that in practice there is considerable overlap between what they term parsimonious care and what they define as rationing. The same is true of the Choosing Wisely campaign endorsed by the American Board of Internal Medicine. In both cases, if the goal is to control healthcare costs by reducing the use of marginally beneficial care that is not cost effective, then a public conversation about the justness of specific choices is essential.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document