Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hughes ◽  
Amelia Pietropaolo ◽  
Patrick Jones ◽  
Marco Oderda ◽  
Paolo Gontero ◽  
...  
Digestion ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian V. Malfertheiner ◽  
Arne Kandulski ◽  
Jens Schreiber ◽  
Peter Malfertheiner

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa M. Ali ◽  
S.A. Osman ◽  
Al Zand AW ◽  
M.Y.M. Yatim ◽  
Faesal Alatshana ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. e3-e16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yih Chyn Phan ◽  
Jonathan Cobley ◽  
Wasim Mahmalji

Introduction Isiris α™ (Coloplast®) is an innovative single-use disposable flexible cystoscope with an integrated ureteric stent grasper designed specifically to remove ureteric stents. It allows clinicians to remove ureteric stents easily on the wards or in clinics without the need of arranging a routine and dedicated flexible cystoscopy appointment for patients. We evaluated Isiris α’s practical use and cost analysis against traditional reusable endoscopes. Method We compared the cost of removing ureteric stents using Isiris α™ in 10 patients prospectively versus traditional flexible cystoscopes in 10 patients retrospectively. The costs of the equipment, medications, reprocess machines, and utility costs were consulted from the relevant departments and companies. As for labour cost, we have sourced British Medical Association (BMA) and Royal College of Nursing (RCN) websites. Results From our study, it costs £260.65 and £123.41 on average to remove a ureteric stent using Isiris α™ and traditional flexible cystoscope respectively (p<0.001). Stent removal in the endoscopy department was delayed in 60% of patients, on average 6.4 days, compared to 0% of patients using Isiris α™ (p = 0.048). Conclusion Although Isiris α™ is shown to be a more expensive option to remove ureteric stents based on our analysis, it still provides clinicians flexibility and ease in removing ureteric stents in the outpatient clinic, reducing the pressure and demand for dedicated flexible cystoscopy slots in the endoscopy department.


2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 203-206
Author(s):  
José Xavier ◽  
Erivaldo Antonio ◽  
Lisiane Oliveira ◽  
Sandra de Souza ◽  
Juliana de Medeiros ◽  
...  

AbstractThe present study is a systematic review of the literature that aimed to characterize the profile in animal models used to study perinatal protein malnutrition correlating with the cardiovascular system and the implications of malnutrition to the heart. Therefore, an extensive search was conducted in the PubMed, BVS, and SciELO databases, using combinations of the descriptors protein malnutrition, pregnancy, heart, lactation, and cardiovascular system. A total of 247 articles were found, but after excluding duplicities and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, only 12 papers remained. The analysis of the results shows that the diet used in the studies has a protein content of between 17 and 22% for the control animals, and of between 0 and 9% for the animals submitted to perinatal protein malnutrition. The main morphofunctional changes observed in the cardiovascular system are related to high blood pressure, increased apoptosis of cardiomyocytes, and reduction in the absolute size of the heart, among other ultrastructural and molecular changes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isis J. Visser ◽  
Jasper P. T. van der Staaij ◽  
Anand Muthusamy ◽  
Michelle Willicombe ◽  
Jeffrey A. Lafranca ◽  
...  

Implanting a ureteric stent during ureteroneocystostomy reduces the risk of leakage and ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation (KTx), but it may also predispose to urinary tract infections (UTIs). The aim of this study is to determine the optimal timing for ureteric stent removal after KTx. Searches were performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE Ovid, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (until November 2017). For this systematic review, all aspects of the Cochrane Handbook for Interventional Systematic Reviews were followed and it was written based on the PRISMA-statement. Articles discussing JJ-stents (double-J stents) and their time of removal in relation to outcomes, UTIs, urinary leakage, ureteral stenosis or reintervention were included. One-thousand-and-forty-three articles were identified, of which fourteen articles (three randomised controlled trials, nine retrospective cohort studies, and two prospective cohort studies) were included (describing in total n = 3612 patients). Meta-analysis using random effect models showed a significant reduction of UTIs when stents were removed earlier than three weeks (OR 0.49, CI 95%, 0.33 to 0.75, p = 0.0009). Regarding incidence of urinary leakage, there was no significant difference between early (<3 weeks) and late stent removal (>3 weeks) (OR 0.60, CI 95%, 0.29 to 1.23, p = 0.16). Based on our results, earlier stent removal (<3 weeks) was associated with a decreased incidence of UTIs and did not show a higher incidence of urinary leakage compared to later removal (>3 weeks). We recommend that the routine removal of ureteric stents implanted during KTx should be performed around three weeks post-operatively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document