Nocturnal Salivary Fluoride Bioavailability After Brushing with a High-fluoride Dentifrice

Author(s):  
Maria Suzi de Sousa Lopes ◽  
Guilherme Bandeira Santana ◽  
Niciane Soares Macena ◽  
Guereth Alexsanderson Oliveira Carvalho ◽  
Brenda Izabela Santana Mota ◽  
...  
Gerodontology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-351
Author(s):  
Fabiana Rolim ◽  
Clésio Melo ◽  
Miquéias Silva ◽  
Cinthia Tabchoury ◽  
Glauber Vale

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Érico Luiz Damasceno Barros ◽  
Shelon Cristina Souza Pinto ◽  
Alvaro Henrique Borges ◽  
Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto ◽  
Roger Phillip Ellwood ◽  
...  

This study evaluated the effect of high fluoride dentifrice on the bond strength of brackets after erosive challenge. Eighty-four enamel specimens were divided into seven groups(n=12): WN (distilled water/no acid challenge), W3C (distilled water/3 cycles of acid challenge), and W6C (distilled water/6 cycles of acid challenge) were not submitted to dentifrice treatment. Groups RF3C (regular fluoride dentifrice/3 cycles of acid challenge) and RF6C (regular fluoride dentifrice/6 cycles of acid challenge) were treated with dentifrices containing 1450 μg F−/g and HF3C (high fluoride dentifrice/3 cycles of acid challenge) and HF6C (high fluoride dentifrice/6 cycles of acid challenge) were with 5000 μg F−/g. Acid challenges were performed for seven days. After bond strength test, there was no significant difference among groups submitted to 3 cycles of acid challenge(P>0.05). Statistically significant difference was found between the regular and high fluoride dentifrices after 6 cycles of acid challenge (<0.05). Similar areas of adhesive remaining were found among control groups and among groups W6C, RF3C, RF6C, HF3C, and HF6C. The high fluoride dentifrice was able to prevent the reduction of bond strength values of brackets submitted to acid challenge. Clinical relevance: the high fluoride toothpaste prevents debonded brackets on erosive enamel.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Tatiana Belluccio dos Santos Vidinha ◽  
Andréa Lanzillotti Cardoso ◽  
Celso Da Silva Queiróz

Objetivo: Avaliar a efetividade do dentifrício de alta concentração de F na diminuição do processo de desmineralização do esmalte. Material e Métodos: Foram confeccionadas trinta amostras de esmalte bovino, as quais foram lixadas, polidas e obtida a microdureza (Knoop) inicial. As amostras foram distribuídas aleatoriamente em três grupos (G): DP - dentifrício sem F (placebo), DC - dentifrício convencional (1450 ppmF) e DAC - dentifrício de alta concentração (5000 ppmF). Para avaliar o processo dinâmico de desmineralização, cada grupo foi submetido a uma ciclagem de pH com solução desmineralizante e solução remineralizante. As amostras foram imersas durante 6 e 18h nas respectivamente soluções, durante cinco dias, a 37oC. O dentifrício correspondente a cada grupo foi diluído (1:3) e as amostras foram tratadas por 1 minuto, duas vezes ao dia. Após a ciclagem, foi realizada a análise da microdureza final e aplicado ANOVA e Tukey (p<0,05). Resultados: Os resultados mostraram que a microdureza final do DAC (247,4?39,4) comparada ao DC (211,9?53,5) mostrou diferença estatística (p?0,05). Conclusão: De acordo com os resultados, pode-se sugerir que o dentifrício de alta concentração de Flúor apresenta resultados superiores na inibição do processo de desmineralização do esmalte quando comparado ao dentifrício convencional


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
FG Rolim ◽  
AF Sá ◽  
GWL Silva-Filho ◽  
A de S Brandim ◽  
GC Vale

SUMMARY Aim: This in vitro study analyzed the antierosive potential of a high-fluoride dentifrice on enamel adjacent to restorations. Methods and Materials: Enamel blocks (6 × 6 × 3 mm) from bovine incisor teeth were restored with three different restorative materials (resin, conventional glass ionomer cement, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement) and treated with dentifrices containing 0, 1100, or 5000 ppm F. After restorative procedures, initial surface Vickers hardness of the blocks were obtained. The specimens were submitted to pH cycles (4 × 90 seconds in soft drink) and treatments for five days. Between the challenges and overnight, the blocks remained in artificial saliva. At the end of the experiment, the final hardness was assessed and the percentage of surface mineral loss (%SML) was calculated. A 3 × 3 factorial design was used to conduct statistical analysis. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and t-test, with significance level fixed at 5%. Results: High-fluoride dentifrice decreased demineralization caused by erosive challenge regardless of the restorative material used (p&lt;0.001). Likewise, the blocks restored with conventional glass ionomer cement showed lower values of SML irrespective of dentifrice used (p&lt;0.001). Conclusion: Use of a high-fluoride dentifrice on teeth restored with conventional glass ionomer cement offers additional protection against enamel erosion.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constanza E. Fernández ◽  
Livia Maria Andaló Tenuta ◽  
Altair Antoninha Del Bel Cury ◽  
Diego Figueiredo Nóbrega ◽  
Jaime Aparecido Cury

High fluoride dentifrice (FD; 5,000 ppm F) has been recommended to arrest root dentine lesions and to control enamel caries in high-risk patients. Also, standard FD (1,100 ppm F) in combination with professional fluoride application has been recommended to control dentine caries, but the effect of this combination on enamel has been considered modest. Considering the lack of evaluation comparing the use of 5,000 ppm FD (5,000-FD) versus acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) application combined with 1,100 ppm FD (1,100-FD) on the inhibition and repair of caries lesions in both enamel and dentine, we conducted this in situ, double-blind, crossover study of 3 phases of 14 days. In each phase, 18 volunteers wore palatal appliances containing enamel and root dentine specimens, either sound or carious, to evaluate the effect of the treatments on the inhibition or repair of caries lesions, respectively. The treatments were non-FD (negative control), 5,000-FD, or 1 APF gel application on dental specimens combined with 1,100-FD used twice per day (APF + 1,100-FD). The reduction of demineralization and enhancement of remineralization were assessed by surface and cross-sectional hardness. Fluoride concentration was determined on dental specimens and on the formed biofilm. For enamel, APF + 1,100-FD and 5,000-FD did not differ regarding the inhibition of demineralization and repair of caries lesions. However, for dentine the difference between these treatments was inconclusive because while APF + 1,100-FD was more effective than 5,000-FD in caries lesion reduction and repair, 5,000-FD was more effective than APF + 1,100-FD in the reduction of surface demineralization. Therefore, the findings show that the combination of APF + 1,100-FD is as effective as 5,000-FD in enamel inhibition of demineralization and enhancement of remineralization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-29
Author(s):  
Glauber Vale ◽  
Nícolas Simões ◽  
Guilherme Santana ◽  
Brenda Mota ◽  
Marcoeli Moura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document