scholarly journals Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study with Focus on Novel Markers (Sst2–Sst5)

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1211
Author(s):  
Frediano Inzani ◽  
Angela Santoro ◽  
Giuseppe Angelico ◽  
Angela Feraco ◽  
Saveria Spadola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
Somatostatin Receptors ◽  
Neuroendocrine Differentiation ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Somatostatin Analogues ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Background. Gynecological neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are extremely rare, accounting for 1.2–2.4% of the NENs. The aim of this study was to test cervical NENs for novel markers of potential utility for differential diagnosis and target therapy. Methods. All cases of our center (n = 16) were retrieved and tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for 12 markers including markers of neuroendocrine differentiation (chromogranin A, synaptophysin, CD56), transcription factors (CDX2 and TTF1), proteins p40, p63, p16INK4a, and p53, somatostatin receptors subtypes (SST2-SST5) and the proliferation marker Ki67 (MIB1). Results. All cases were poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), 10 small cell types (small cell–neuroendocrine carcinomas, SCNECs) and 6 large cell types (large cell–neuroendocrine carcinomas, LCNECs); in 3 cases a predominant associated adenocarcinoma component was observed. Neuroendocrine cancer cells expressed at least 2 of the 3 tested neuroendocrine markers; p16 was intensely expressed in 14 (87.5%) cases; SST5 in 11 (56.25%, score 2–3, in 9 cases); SST2 in 8 (50%, score 2–3 in 8), CDX2 in 8 (50%), TTF1 in 5 (31.25%), and p53 in 1 case (0.06%). P63 and p40 expressions were negative, with the exception of one case that showed moderate expression for p63. Conclusions. P40 is a more useful marker for the differential diagnosis compared to squamous cell carcinoma. Neither CDX2 nor TTF1 expression may help the differential diagnosis versus potential cervical metastasis. P16 expression may suggest a cervical origin of NEC; however, it must be always integrated by clinical and instrumental data. The expression of SST2 and SST5 could support a role for SSAs (Somatostatin Analogues) in the diagnosis and therapy of patients with cervical NECs.

Comparative Outcomes in Patients With Small- and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC) and Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Stomach

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095000
Author(s):  
Nam Young Choi ◽  
Byung-Sik Kim ◽  
Sung Tae Oh ◽  
Jeong Hwan Yook ◽  
Beom Su Kim
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Intermediate Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Background Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), consisting of both large- and small-cell NECs, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs), including mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), are a group of high-grade malignancies. Few studies to date have reported clinical outcomes, including prognosis, in patients with these tumors. This study therefore evaluated the clinicopathologic outcomes and prognosis in patients with NECs and MANECs. Methods This study included 36 patients diagnosed with gastric NECs, including 23 with large-cell and 13 with small-cell NECs, and 85 with MiNENs, including 70 with high-grade and 15 with intermediate-grade MiNENs. Clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), were assessed. Results DFS was significantly poorer in patients with NEC than in patients with intermediate-grade MiNEN ( P < .05), whereas both OS and DFS were similar in patients with NEC and high-grade MiNEN ( P > .05). Patients with large-cell NEC were more likely to undergo aggressive surgery than patients with high-grade MiNEN ( P < .05). Lymphovascular invasion was more frequent and DFS poorer in patients with large-cell than small-cell NECs ( P < .05 each). Conclusion DFS is significantly poorer in patients with NEC than in patients with intermediate-grade MiNEN and significantly lower in patients with large-cell than small-cell NECs.

scholarly journals Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous?

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz-Line Vélayoudom-Céphise ◽  
Pierre Duvillard ◽  
Lydia Foucan ◽  
Julien Hadoux ◽  
Cecile N Chougnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Index ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Neuron Specific Enolase ◽  
Morphological Differentiation ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Poorly Differentiated

The new WHO classification of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) implies that G3 neoplasms with mitotic index >20 and/or Ki67 index >20% are neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), described as poorly differentiated, small or large cell types, by analogy with lung NEC. To characterize the subgroup of non-small-cell-type GEP and thoracic NET with mitotic index >20 and/or Ki67 >20% according to their pathological features, response to cisplatin and overall survival (OS). We reviewed pathological and clinical presentation of G3 non-small-cell-type NET referred to our institution for 5 years. Data from 166 patients with metastatic thoracic and GEP-NET were collected. Twenty-eight patients (17%) fulfill the inclusion criteria. Tumors were classified as well-differentiated NET (G3-WDNET) in 42.8% of cases and poorly differentiated, large-cell NEC (G3-LCNEC) in 57.2% of cases. Plasma chromogranin A or neuron-specific enolase were elevated in 42 and 25% respectively of G3-WDNET and 31 and 50% of G3-LCNEC. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was positive in 88 and 50% of G3-WDNET or G3-LCNEC respectively. Complete or partial response to cisplatin was observed in 31% of cases, all classified as G3-LCNEC. The median OS was 41 months for G3-WDNET but 17 months for G3-LCNEC (P=0.34). Short survival was observed in 25% of G3-WDNET but 62.5% of G3-LCNEC patients (P=0.049). G3 ENETS GEP and thoracic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) could constitute a heterogeneous subgroup of NEN as regards diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. If confirmed, future classifications may consider splitting them into two groups according to their morphological differentiation.

scholarly journals SOX11 is a sensitive and specific marker for pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine tumors

2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Yu ◽  
Yuting Dong ◽  
Jin Xue ◽  
Sanpeng Xu ◽  
Guoping Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Specific Marker ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Immunohistochemical Expression ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Sox11 Expression ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Abstract Background Synaptophysin (SYN), chromogranin A (CGA), CD56 and insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) are proposed neuroendocrine (NE) markers used for diagnosis of pulmonary NE tumors. These NE markers have been identified in subsets of non-NE tumors requiring differential diagnosis, thus we sought to explore new NE markers. Methods We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of SOX11, a transcription factor involved in neurogenesis, in pulmonary NE tumors and large cell carcinomas (LCCs). Results We found that SOX11 showed a sensitivity similar to INSM1 and CGA, and less than SYN and CD56 in small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs). While SOX11 is more specific than the other four markers for diagnosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HG-NECs) because 1) None of LCCs (0/63), the most challenging non-NE tumor type for differential diagnosis due to overlapped morphology with LCNECs displayed SOX11 positivity. While expression of at least one of SYN, CGA, CD56 or INSM1 was identified in approximately 60% (18/30) of LCCs. 2) SOX11 was only expressed in 1 of 37 carcinoid tumors in contrast to diffuse expression of SYN, CGA, CD56 and INSM1. In HG-NECs, we noticed that SOX11 was a good complementary marker for SCLC diagnosis as it was positive in 7 of 18 SYN−/CGA−/CD56− SCLCs and 3 of 8 SYN−/CGA−/CD56−/INSM1− SCLCs, and SOX11 positivity in 4 of 6 SYN−/CGA−/CD56− cases previously diagnosed as LCCs with NE morphology provides additional evidence of NE differentiation for reclassification into LCNECs, which was further confirmed by electromicroscopical identification of neurosecretory granules. We also found SOX11 expression cannot predict the prognosis in patients with HG-NECs. Conclusions Therefore, SOX11 is a useful complementary transcriptional NE marker for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SCLC and LCNEC.

scholarly journals Primary MiNEN of the urinary bladder: an hitherto undescribed entity composed of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with a distinct clinical behavior

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Maria Pini ◽  
Silvia Uccella ◽  
Matteo Corinti ◽  
Maurizio Colecchia ◽  
Giuseppe Pelosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Bladder ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Unique Case ◽  
Clinical Behavior ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractNeuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the urinary bladder are very rare and can be observed in the context of mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), most frequently in association with urothelial carcinoma. Small cell NECs are far more common than large cell NECs (LCNECs), which are exceedingly rare. We describe a primary MiNEN of the urinary bladder, composed of a LCNEC and of an adenocarcinoma, in which the neuroendocrine component reached complete pathological regression after neoadjuvant M-VAC chemotherapy, whereas the non-neuroendocrine component of the tumor progressed to metastatic disease. Compared to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms described in the literature until now, this appears to be a unique case that expands the spectrum of neuroendocrine neoplasia of the urinary bladder.

scholarly journals Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Ovary Arising from Endometriosis: Molecular Pathology Analysis in Support of a Pathogenetic Paradigm

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Maragliano ◽  
Laura Libera ◽  
Ileana Carnevali ◽  
Valeria Pensotti ◽  
Giovanna De Vecchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasm ◽  
Molecular Profile ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Sequencing Analysis ◽  
Endometrioid Carcinoma ◽  
Preneoplastic Lesions ◽  
Ovarian Endometriosis ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

AbstractPrimary ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms (Ov-NENs) are infrequent and mainly represented by well-differentiated forms (neuroendocrine tumors — NETs — or carcinoids). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (Ov-NECs) are exceedingly rare and only few cases have been reported in the literature. A subset of Ov-NECs are admixed with non-neuroendocrine carcinomas, as it occurs in other female genital organs, as well (mostly endometrium and uterine cervix), and may be assimilated to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) described in digestive and extra-digestive sites. Here, we present a case of large cell Ov-NEC admixed with an endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary, arising in the context of ovarian endometriosis, associated with a uterine endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). We performed targeted next-generation sequencing analysis, along with a comprehensive immunohistochemical study and FISH analysis for TP53 locus, separately on the four morphologically distinct lesions (Ov-NEC, endometrioid carcinoma, endometriosis, and EAH). The results of our study identified molecular alterations of cancer-related genes (PIK3CA, CTNNB1, TP53, RB1, ARID1A, and p16), which were present with an increasing gradient from preneoplastic lesions to malignant proliferations, both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. In conclusion, our findings underscored that the two neoplastic components of this Ov-MiNEN share a substantially identical molecular profile and they progress from a preexisting ovarian endometriotic lesion, in a patient with a coexisting preneoplastic proliferation of the endometrium, genotypically and phenotypically related to the ovarian neoplasm. Moreover, this study supports the inclusion of MiNEN in the spectrum ovarian and, possibly, of all gynecological NENs, among which they are currently not classified.

Chromosomal aberrations in a series of large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas: Unexpected divergence from small-cell carcinoma of the lung

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1059-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhard Ullmann ◽  
Susanna Petzmann ◽  
Anu Sharma ◽  
Philip Theo Cagle ◽  
Helmut Hans Popper
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Small Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Chromosomal Aberrations ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

Phase II study of pembrolizumab-based therapy in previously treated extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: Results of Part B (pembrolizumab + chemotherapy).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4148-4148
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Chan ◽  
Nitya Prabhakar Raj ◽  
Rahul Raj Aggarwal ◽  
Susan Calabrese ◽  
April DeMore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Total N ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

4148 Background: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has not been established in extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-PDNECs). In small cell lung cancer, CPI therapy is approved for use in the first-line and salvage settings. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (PEM)-based therapy in biomarker-unselected patients (pts) with EP-PDNECs. PEM alone (Part A, N=14) was inactive (ASCO GI 2019; Abstr#363). We now report the results of Part B (PEM plus chemotherapy). Methods: We conducted an open label, multicenter, phase 2 study of PEM-based therapy in pts with EP-PDNECs, excluding Merkel cell carcinoma and well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET), with disease progression on first-line systemic therapy. In Part B of this trial, patients were treated with PEM 200 mg IV every 3 week cycle plus dealers’ choice chemotherapy (chemo): weekly irinotecan (IRI, 125 mg/m2 day 1,8 of every 21 day cycle) or weekly paclitaxel (PAC, 80 mg/m2). After PEM/IRI safety lead-in (N=6), 16 additional pts (total N=22) were enrolled. This was based on a primary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 and a plan to test Ha ORR 31% vs H0 ORR 10% with 80% power at a type I error rate of 0.05. Secondary endpoints include safety, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Serial blood samples and baseline tumor biopsies were required in all pts. Results: Preliminary data from Part B are available. Of 22 pts enrolled, male/female 15/7; median age 57 years (range 34-75); ECOG PS 0/1: 10/12; 6 large cell, 8 small cell, 8 NOS. Primary sites of disease: GI 73%, GYN 5%, unknown 23%. Ki67 index (available for 18 pts) median 68% (range 30 to >95%). Chemo choice: 17 IRI (77%) and 5 PAC (23%). PEM/IRI was safe based on lead-in. Median number of cycles of therapy administered was 3 (range 0-13). Treatment-related Gr 3 or 4 AE occurred in 7 (32%) of 22 pts overall: 4 (18%) had at least one Gr 3 AE attributed to PEM (1 pt each with pain, ALT increase, or nausea; 2 with fatigue); 7 (32%) had at least one Gr 3/4 AE attributed to chemo (2 with fatigue, 2 with neutropenia; 1 each with pain, ALT increase, hyponatremia, diarrhea, nausea, and/or acute kidney injury). No grade 5 AE. ORR was 9%: PR in 2 pts (9%), SD 3 pts (14%), PD 13 pts (60%); 4 pts (18%) unevaluable (off study before first scheduled scan). Median PFS 2 mo. At last follow-up, 5 pts (23%) were alive with 1 pt still on treatment. Median OS 4 mo. Of 21 pts off treatment, 76% off for PD, 10% off for AE, 14% off for withdrawal of consent/other therapy. Conclusions: PEM + chemotherapy was not effective in this pretreated, biomarker-unselected population of EP-PDNECs arising in different organs. Biomarker studies are planned (Parts A/B). Clinical trial information: NCT03136055.

Typical Carcinoid Tumor of the Larynx Occurring with Otalgia: A Case Report

2002 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy C. Cuzzourt ◽  
John C. Pezold ◽  
C. Warren Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Local Excision ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
World Health ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Pertinent Literature ◽  
Typical Carcinoid ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas ◽  
Rare Group

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the larynx comprise a rare group of tumors that have a controversial history with regard to their classification. The World Health Organization categorizes these tumors as typical carcinoids, atypical carcinoids, small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, and paragangliomas. A typical carcinoids and small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas are the more common. Only 13 cases of typical carcinoid have been reported. Local excision is sufficient for typical carcinoids and paragangliomas, but atypical carcinoids require neck dissection because of their tendency to metastasize. Small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas are not cured by local excision, and these patients have the worst prognosis (5-year survival: 5%); their treatment is limited to chemo- and radiotherapy. Because of these variations in tumor behavior and treatment, it is essential that otolaryngologists and pathologists be able to correctly identify the specific type of tumor in order to optimize patient treatment and survival. We report a case of typical carcinoid and review the pertinent literature on this subject.

The Spectrum of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Histologic Classification, Unique Features and Areas of Overlap

2015 ◽  
pp. 92-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Klimstra ◽  
Himisha Beltran ◽  
Rogerio Lilenbaum ◽  
Emily Bergsland
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Neuroendocrine Differentiation ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Neuroendocrine Cells ◽  
Neuroendocrine Neoplasms ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Grade 3

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are diverse in terms of sites of origin, functional status, and degrees of aggressiveness. This review will introduce some of the common features of neuroendocrine neoplasms and will explore the differences in pathology, classification, biology, and clinical management between tumors of different anatomic sites, specifically, the lung, pancreas, and prostate. Despite sharing neuroendocrine differentiation and histologic evidence of the neuroendocrine phenotype in most organs, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD-NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (PD-NECs) are two very different families of neoplasms. WD-NETs (grade 1 and 2) are relatively indolent (with a natural history that can evolve over many years or decades), closely resemble non-neoplastic neuroendocrine cells, and demonstrate production of neurosecretory proteins, such as chromogranin A. They arise in the lungs and throughout the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas, but WD-NETs of the prostate gland are uncommon. Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy, but treatment of unresectable disease depends on the site of origin. In contrast, PD-NECs (grade 3, small cell or large cell) of all sites often demonstrate alterations in P53 and Rb, exhibit an aggressive clinical course, and are treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Only WD-NETs arise in patients with inherited neuroendocrine neoplasia syndromes (e.g., multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1), and some common genetic alterations are site-specific (e.g., TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangement in PD-NECs arising in the prostate gland). Advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of NETs should lead to new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and is an area of active investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document