scholarly journals Renal Cell Carcinoma with Clear Cell Papillary Features: Perspectives of a Differential Diagnosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 1767-1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Áron Somorácz ◽  
Levente Kuthi ◽  
Tamás Micsik ◽  
Alex Jenei ◽  
Adrienn Hajdu ◽  
...  

Abstract Thirty-one cases of low-grade renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear cells and tubulopapillary/papillary architecture were analyzed retrospectively with immunohistochemical and genetic markers to gain more experience with the differential diagnosis of such cases. All samples coexpressed CK7 and CA9; the TFE3 or TFEB reactions were negative; the CD10 and the AMACR stainings were negative in 27 cases and 30 cases, respectively. The FISH assays for papillary RCC, available in 27 cases, and deletion of chromosome 3p, available in 29 cases, gave negative results. The results for 3p deletion, VHL gene mutation or VHL gene promoter region hypermethylation testing, along with the diffuse CD10-positivity in 2 cases confirmed 21 cases as clear cell papillary RCC (CCPRCC; CK7+, CA9+; no 3p loss, no VHL abnormality) and 10 cases as clear cell RCC (CCRCC; CK7+, CA9+; no 3p loss, VHL abnormality mutation/hypermethylation present). In CCPRCCs, the representative growth pattern was branching tubulo-acinar, commonly accompanied by cyst formation. The linear nuclear arrangement or cup-shaped staining of CA9 did not necessarily indicate CCPRCC, and the absence of these did not exclude the diagnosis of CCPPRC. One tumor infiltrated the renal sinus; the others exhibited pT1 stage; and metastatic outcome was not recorded. The CCRCC cases were in pT1 stage; 6 exhibited cup-shaped staining of CA9, and 1 displayed lymph node metastasis at the time of surgery. Distant metastatic disease was not observed. In summary, the VHL abnormalities distinguished the subset of CCRCC with diffuse CK7-positivity and no 3p loss from cases of CCPRCC.

Author(s):  
Alexander J Gallan ◽  
Megan Parilla ◽  
Jeremy Segal ◽  
Lauren Ritterhouse ◽  
Tatjana Antic

Abstract Objectives While aberrations in the VHL gene and chromosome 3p resulting in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) are well established, we know that additional mutations in chromatin remodeling genes PBRM1, SETD2, and BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) contribute to pathogenesis in some cases. Given the known aggressive clinical behavior of BAP1-mutated CCRCC, we sought to define the pathologic phenotype of BAP1-mutated CCRCC. Methods We identified 14 cases of molecularly proven BAP1-mutated CCRCC and investigated their clinicopathologic features. Results BAP1-mutated CCRCC frequently showed papillary, tubulopapillary, or expanded nested architecture; demonstrated granular to diffusely eosinophilic cytoplasm with prominent eosinophilic globules; and contained high-grade nuclei. This morphology demonstrates significant overlap with Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Immunohistochemistry notably demonstrates loss of BAP1 expression in almost all tumors, in addition to strong p504S expression. A conventional CCRCC component was frequently present adjacent to the characteristic BAP1 areas and showed retained BAP1 expression and only patchy p504S. Approximately two-thirds of BAP1-mutated CCRCCs were stage pT3, renal vein invasion was common, and 50% developed metastases. Conclusions Herein, we describe the histologic and immunohistochemical findings in BAP1-mutated CCRCC, which has important implications for utilization of molecular testing, prognosis, future therapeutics, and distinction from other RCC subtypes such as Xp11 translocation RCC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Toguchi ◽  
Toshio Takagi ◽  
Yuko Ogawa ◽  
Satoru Morita ◽  
Kazuhiko Yoshida ◽  
...  

AbstractTo investigate the detection of peritumoral pseudocapsule (PC) using multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for tumors resected by robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Study participants included 206 patients with clinical T1 RCC who underwent RAPN between October 2017 and February 2018. Two radiologists who were blinded to the pathological findings evaluated the computed tomography (CT) images. Radiological diagnosis of a PC was defined by a combination of observations, including a low-attenuation rim between the tumor and renal cortex in the cortico-medullary phase and a high-attenuation rim at the edge of the tumor in the nephrogenic or excretory phase. A PC was detected on CT in 156/206 tumors (76%) and identified by pathology in 182/206 (88%) tumors including 153/166 (92%) clear cell RCC, 13/14 (93%) papillary RCC, and 7/16 (44%) chromophobe RCC. In the whole cohort, CT findings showed a sensitivity of 81.3% (148/182), specificity of 66.7% (16/24), and positive predictive value of 94.9% (148/156). When the data were stratified according to pathological subtypes, MDCT was observed to have a sensitivity of 86.9% (133/153) and specificity of 61.5% (8/13) in clear cell RCC, sensitivity of 38.5% (5/13) and specificity of 100% (1/1) in papillary RCC, and sensitivity of 44.4% (4/7) and specificity of 66.7% (6/9) in chromophobe RCC. A low or high-attenuation rim around the tumor in the cortico-medullary or nephrographic-to-excretory phase indicates a PC of RCC, though the accuracy is not satisfactory even with 64- or 320-detector MDCT.


2013 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajen Goyal ◽  
Elizabeth Gersbach ◽  
Ximing J. Yang ◽  
Stephen M. Rohan

Context.—The World Health Organization classification of renal tumors synthesizes morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings to define more than 40 tumor types. Of these, clear cell (conventional) renal cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor in adults and—with the exception of some rare tumors—the most deadly. The diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma on morphologic grounds alone is generally straightforward, but challenging cases are not infrequent. A misdiagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma has clinical consequences, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies. Objective.—To highlight morphologic mimics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and provide strategies to help differentiate clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other renal tumors and lesions. The role of the pathologist in guiding treatment for renal malignancies will be emphasized to stress the importance of proper tumor classification in patient management. Data Sources.—Published literature and personal experience. Conclusions.—In challenging cases, submission of additional tissue is often an inexpensive and effective way to facilitate a correct diagnosis. If immunohistochemical stains are to be used, it is best to use a panel of markers, as no one marker is specific for a given renal tumor subtype. Selection of limited markers, based on a specific differential diagnosis, can be as useful as a large panel in reaching a definitive diagnosis. For renal tumors, both the presence and absence of immunoreactivity and the pattern of labeling (membranous, cytoplasmic, diffuse, focal) are important when interpreting the results of immunohistochemical stains.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Rosaria Raspollini ◽  
Ilaria Montagnani ◽  
Rodolfo Montironi ◽  
Francesca Castiglione ◽  
Guido Martignoni ◽  
...  

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is an heterogeneous tumour at architectural, cellular and molecular level, a reason why the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus recommended wide sampling of RCC masses to include at least 1 block/cm of tumour together with perpendicular sections of the tumour/perinephric fat interface and the tumour/renal sinus interface. Intratumoural molecular heterogeneity may be a limitation at the moment of defining precision medicine strategies based on gene mutation status. This study analyses the presence of any mutation of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ALK, ERBB2, DDR2, MAP2K1, RET and EGFR genes in 20 tissue blocks from a case of ccRCC and its metastasis. We observed the presence of the mutation at pH1047R of PIK3CA gene in five samples of the tumour, while the remaining 15 samples did not show any mutation at PIK3CA or any other investigated gene. There is a great need to develop novel RCC sampling strategies to overcome tumour heterogeneity prior to define precision oncology strategies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 143 (9) ◽  
pp. 1154-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Zhao ◽  
Eduardo Eyzaguirre

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (ccpRCC) is a recently recognized entity and represents the fourth most common variant of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). It has unique morphologic and immunohistochemical features and demonstrates an indolent clinical behavior. Microscopically, it may mimic other RCCs with clear cell features, such as clear cell RCC, translocation RCC, and papillary RCC with clear cell changes. A high index of suspicion is required to keep ccpRCC in the differential diagnosis of RCCs with features of clear cell and/or papillary architecture. In equivocal cases, immunohistochemistry is generally sufficient to substantiate the diagnosis of ccpRCC. In this review, we discuss the clinical, gross, and histopathologic features, immunohistochemical and genetic profiling, and prognosis of ccpRCC.


2012 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
pp. 907-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Young ◽  
Lakshmi P. Kunju

We report the case of a high-grade carcinoma involving the kidney in a young male with renal vein thrombosis and review the differential diagnosis and immunohistochemical workup. High-grade neoplasms involving the renal sinus include collecting duct carcinomas (CDCs), renal medullary carcinomas (RMCs), invasive high-grade urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the upper urinary tract, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma. Distinguishing UC from CDC and RMC is problematic in small biopsy samples. The diagnosis of CDC (a rare, aggressive subtype of renal cell carcinoma) is challenging and requires the exclusion of UC. Renal medullary carcinoma is characterized by an appropriate clinical setting and consistent loss of nuclear expression of integrase interactor 1 (INI-1). A panel consisting of p63, paired box gene 8 (PAX8), and INI-1 is most optimal in distinguishing UC from CDC and RMC. A subset of urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract may be positive with PAX8.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4564-4564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Coy ◽  
Michael Douek ◽  
Jonathan Young ◽  
Matthew S. Brown ◽  
Jonathan Goldin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document