Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT imaging and different response evaluation criteria after primary systemic therapy of breast cancer

Breast Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tímea Tőkés ◽  
Kornélia Kajáry ◽  
Gyöngyvér Szentmártoni ◽  
Zsolt Lengyel ◽  
Tamás Györke ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Castello ◽  
Egesta Lopci

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have achieved astonishing results and improved overall survival (OS) in several types of malignancies, including advanced melanoma. However, due to a peculiar type of anti-cancer activity provided by these drugs, the response patterns during ICI treatment are completely different from that with “old” chemotherapeutic agents. Objective: To provide an overview of the available literature and potentials of 18F-FDG PET/CT in advanced melanoma during the course of therapy with ICI in the context of treatment response evaluation. Methods: Morphologic criteria, expressed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), immune-related response criteria (irRC), irRECIST, and, more recently, immune-RECIST (iRECIST), along with response criteria based on the metabolic parameters with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18FFDG), have been explored. Results: To overcome the limits of traditional response criteria, new metabolic response criteria have been introduced on time and are being continuously updated, such as the PET/CT Criteria for the early prediction of Response to Immune checkpoint inhibitor Therapy (PECRIT), the PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT), and “immunotherapy-modified” PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (imPERCIST). The introduction of new PET radiotracers, based on monoclonal antibodies combined with radioactive elements (“immune-PET”), are of great interest. Conclusion: Although the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in malignant melanoma has been widely validated for detecting distant metastases and recurrences, evidences in course of ICI are still scarce and larger multicenter clinical trials are needed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Francesco Bertagna ◽  
Mattia Bertoli ◽  
Tigu Stela ◽  
Giorgio Saladini ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 112-123
Author(s):  
Ryusuke Murakami ◽  
Yoshimitsu Fukushima ◽  
Hitomi Tani ◽  
Kotomi Iwata ◽  
Shinichiro Kumita ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Hyun O ◽  
Woo Hee Choi ◽  
Eun Ji Han ◽  
Eun-Kyoung Choi ◽  
Byung Joo Chae ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Kitajima ◽  
Kazuhito Fukushima ◽  
Yasuo Miyoshi ◽  
Takayuki Katsuura ◽  
Yoko Igarashi ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredrik Helland ◽  
Martine Hallin Henriksen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Marianne Vogsen ◽  
Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen ◽  
...  

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) can be used for response evaluation in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we aimed to review literature comparing the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in patients with MBC. We made a systematic search in Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane Library using a modified PICO model. The population was MBC patients and the intervention was PERCIST or RECIST. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 checklist. A total of 1975 articles were identified. After screening by title/abstract, 78 articles were selected for further analysis of which 2 duplicates and 33 abstracts/out of focus articles were excluded. The remaining 43 articles provided useful information, but only one met the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. This was a retrospective study of 65 patients with MBC showing one-year progression-free survival for responders versus non-responders to be 59% vs. 27% (p = 0.2) by RECIST compared to 64% vs. 0% (p = 0.0001) by PERCIST. This systematic literature review identified a lack of studies comparing the use of RECIST (with CE-CT) and PERCIST (with FDG-PET/CT) for response evaluation in metastatic breast cancer. The available sparse literature suggests that PERCIST might be more appropriate than RECIST for predicting prognosis in patients with MBC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document