scholarly journals Type D personality as a predictor of poor health outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Pluijmers ◽  
J. Denollet
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1546-1553
Author(s):  
Shemaila Saleem ◽  
Tamkeen Saleem ◽  
Qazi Waheed

Introduction: The prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is escalatingspeedily in the developing world including Pakistan. CVD is considered to be one of the leadingcauses of deaths in near future. The CVD is believed to be associated with personality factorsand the researches continue to refine the key elements predisposing cardiovascular disease.The objective of the study was to explore the construct of a Type A behavior pattern and Type Dpersonality in patients with cardiovascular disease and healthy controls. Settings: CardiologyOPD of the hospitals in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Methods: The psychometric tools used tomeasure these constructs are the Type A behavior pattern scale (TABP), Type D personality Scale(DS14) and Revised Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCS-R). 100 patients with cardiovasculardisease having coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction were compared with 100healthy controls in terms of relevant aspects of their cardiovascular functioning. Traditionalemphasis has been that Type A is a predictor of CVD. Results: The study results indicatethat the Type D is a better predictor of cardiovascular heart disease as compared to Type A.Furthermore, the results indicate that frequency of Type A and Type D is more prevalent in CVDpatients than in the healthy controls. Conclusion: Making an allowance for the high frequencyof Type A and Type D personality in cardiovascular disease, controlling the behavior patternscan be useful for prevention of risk as well as for creating better management of CVD patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgiy Pushkarev ◽  
Johan Denollet ◽  
Vadim Kuznetsov ◽  
Viola Spek ◽  
Elena Yaroslavskaya

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey R. O'Dell ◽  
Kevin S. Masters ◽  
Glen I. Spielmans ◽  
Stephen A. Maisto

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susa Majaluoma ◽  
Tellervo Seppälä ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Päivi Korhonen

Abstract Background Type D personality is a combination of high negative affectivity (NA) and high social inhibition (SI). This personality trait is suspected to impair cardiovascular patients’ recovery. The 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice recommend screening of psychosocial risk factors as Type D personality. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between Type D personality and Metabolic syndrome (MetS) in working-age female population. Methods Six hundred thirty-four female employees with mean age of 48 ± 10 years were evaluated. Type D personality and its components (NA) and (SI) were screened with DS14 questionnaire. The definition of MetS was based on measurements done by trained medical staff. We investigated the relationship between Mets and Type D personality, NA and SI using the logistic regression models adjusting for age, education years, leisure-time physical activity, smoking, alcohol use and depressive symptoms. Results The prevalence of Type D personality was 10.6% (n = 67) [95% CI: 8.3 to 13.2] and MetS 34.7% (n = 220). Type D personality or its subcomponents were not associated with MetS. Women with Type D personality had significantly worse quality of sleep and lower LTPA. They were also more often unsatisfied with their economic situation, they had more often depressive symptoms and psychiatric disorders than non-D type persons. There were no differences in risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Conclusion Screening for Type D personality among working- age, reasonably healthy female population seems not to be practical method for finding persons with risk for cardiovascular disease.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e0176014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera K. Jandackova ◽  
Julian Koenig ◽  
Marc N. Jarczok ◽  
Joachim E. Fischer ◽  
Julian F. Thayer

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula M.C. Mommersteeg ◽  
Johan Denollet ◽  
Elisabeth J. Martens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document