Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation, Least Square Fitting and Calibration Factor Methods for the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Using Direct Pressure Indicating Devices

MAPAN ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanay Rab ◽  
Sanjay Yadav ◽  
Afaqul Zafer ◽  
Abid Haleem ◽  
P. K. Dubey ◽  
...  
Metrologia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Damasceno ◽  
R M H Borges ◽  
P R G Couto ◽  
A P Ordine ◽  
M A Getrouw ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 390-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuka Miura ◽  
Shoichi Nakanishi ◽  
Eiichi Higuchi ◽  
Kiyoshi Takamasu ◽  
Makoto Abe ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jasveer Singh ◽  
Neha Bura ◽  
Kapil Kaushik ◽  
Lakshmi Annamalai Kumaraswamidhas ◽  
Nita Dilawar Sharma

It is well established that the estimation of measurement uncertainty is vital for the validation of any measurement and is an essential parameter of quality assurance. Apart from the conventional technique of law of propagation of uncertainty (LPU), which has many limitations, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) technique has become an essential tool for the estimation of measurement uncertainty in various fields of metrology. The most critical factor in MCS is the generation of random numbers of the input quantities according to their probability distributions. The number of Monte Carlo trials to generate these random numbers significantly affects the results. In particular, the required number of trials is also affected by the parameter for which the uncertainty is to be estimated. Hence, in the current paper, the effect of selection of the number of trials on the random number generation and the resulting output in terms of standard deviation (SD) is investigated for the uncertainty in the effective area of a pneumatic reference pressure standard (NPLI-4) at the CSIR-National Physical Laboratory of India. The simulation results thus obtained are compared amongst themselves, with an adaptive approach as well as with the experimental results. The outcomes are analyzed and discussed in detail.


Author(s):  
Rauf Ibrahim Rauf ◽  
Okoli Juliana Ifeyinwa ◽  
Haruna Umar Yahaya

Assumptions in the classical linear regression model include that of lack of autocorrelation of the error terms and the zero covariance between the explanatory variable and the error terms. This study is channeled towards the estimation of the parameters of the linear models for both time series and cross-sectional data when the above two assumptions are violated. The study used the Monte-Carlo simulation method to investigate the performance of six estimators: ordinary least square (OLS), Prais-Winsten (PW), Cochrane-Orcutt (CC), Maximum Likelihood (MLE), Restricted Maximum- Likelihood (RMLE) and the Weighted Least Square (WLS) in estimating the parameters of a single linear model in which the explanatory variable is also correlated with the autoregressive error terms. Using the models’ finite properties(mean square error) to measure the estimators’ performance, the results shows that OLS should be preferred when autocorrelation level is relatively mild (ρ = 0.3) and the PW, CC, RMLE, and MLE estimator will perform better with the presence of any level of AR (1) disturbance between 0.4 to 0.8 level, while WLS shows better performance at 0.9 level of autocorrelation and above. The study thus recommended the application of the various estimators considered to real-life data to affirm the results of this simulation study.


2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 1205-1211
Author(s):  
Saad Alaoui Sossé ◽  
Taoufiq Saffaj ◽  
Bouchaib Ihssane

Abstract Recently, a novel and effective statistical tool called the uncertainty profile has been developed with the purpose of graphically assessing the validity and estimating the measurement uncertainty of analytical procedures. One way to construct the uncertainty profile is to compute the β-content, γ-confidence tolerance interval. In this study, we propose a tolerance interval based on the combination of the generalized pivotal quantity procedure and Monte-Carlo simulation. The uncertainty profile has been applied successfully in several fields. However, in order to further confirm its universality, this newer approach has been applied to assess the performance of an alternative procedure versus a reference procedure for counting of Escherichia coli bacteria in drinking water. Hence, the aims of this research were to expose how the uncertainty profile can be powerfully applied pursuant to ISO 16140 standards in the frame of interlaboratory study and how to easily make a decision concerning the validity of the procedure. The analysis of the results shows that after the introduction of a correction factor, the alternative procedure is deemed valid over the studied range because the uncertainty limits lie within the acceptability limits set at ±−0.3 log unit/100 ml for a β = 66.7% and γ = 90%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document