Public Displays of Children’s Work in Early Learning and Elementary School Settings as Documentation of Children’s Learning Experiences

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Eckhoff
2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-134
Author(s):  
Christine McLean

In this study, parents were asked for their thoughts on the documentation provided to them by early childhood educators (ECEs), which focused on their young children’s learning experiences in early learning settings. Forty-five parents completed questionnaires focusing on their understandings and experiences with documentation. Seven parents were interviewed at the beginning and the end of the six-month research period. All parents stated that pedagogical documentation contributed to their understanding of how their children learned through play, saying that, among other things, it provided insight into “the mystery that is my child’s day” (parent participant). This was true, as well, for the parents who had children with a diagnosed or suspected disability. Although parents saw pedagogical documentation as adding value to their experience as parents of children in an early learning setting, they noted several challenges in accessing this documentation. This article explores pedagogical documentation from a parents’ perspective, with an emphasis on how the process of accessing documentation has the potential to build relationships between parent and educator and parent and child. The implication that this has for the successful transition of children from early learning settings into school settings is explored.


Soundings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (76) ◽  
pp. 128-157
Author(s):  
Celia Burgess-Macey ◽  
Clare Kelly ◽  
Marjorie Ouvry

Early years education in England is in crisis. This article looks at what is needed to better provide the kind of education and care that young children need outside the home, from birth to school-starting age. It explores: the current arrangements and varieties of provision and approaches in England; educational and developmental research about young children's development and early learning; the current national early years curriculum and how it contrasts to other international models and pedagogical approaches; the importance of play-based learning; the role of adults in observing, recording, assessing and supporting young children's learning; and the holistic nature of children's learning - which makes education and care inseparable in young children's lives. Neoliberal governments have had little interest in these questions: they have been focused instead on marketising the sector, which has led to great inequality of provision; and they have been unwilling to provide the necessary funding to train staff and maintain appropriate learning environments; most fundamentally, they have engaged in an ideological drive to impose on very small children a narrow and formal curriculum that ignores all the evidence about good practice in the sector, and is focused on making them 'school ready' - that is, ready to fit into the rigid frameworks they have already imposed on primary school education.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-460
Author(s):  
Patrícia Rodrigues Rocha ◽  
Alessandra de Souza Santos

Resumo: Este é um relato de experiência sobre a sondagem da escrita realizada com alunos dos três primeiros anos do Ensino Fundamental, uma das atividades propostas pelas Orientadoras de Estudos (OE) do Pacto Nacional pela Alfabetização na Idade Certa (PNAIC) 2016 Polo Nova Iguaçu/RJ. Nosso objetivo com este relato é acentuar a importância da sondagem da escrita como instrumento de avaliação no período da alfabetização. Aplicamos um ditado para a escrita e leitura imediata pelos alunos das escolas em que atuamos como Orientadoras Pedagógicas. Percebemos significativos avanços na aprendizagem das crianças. Concluímos que tal prática deve ocorrer constantemente em todo o período da alfabetização de modo a mobilizar estratégias de intervenção pelo professor e o desenvolvimento dos alunos.Palavras-chave: Avaliação. Sondagem. Alfabetização. Abstract: This is an experience report on the writing analysis conducted with students of the first three years of elementary school, one of the activities proposed by the Trainers of Studies of the National Pact for Literacy in the Right Age (PNAIC) 2016 Polo Nova Iguaçu / RJ. Our objective with this report is to emphasize the importance of the writing analysis as an evaluation tool in the literacy period. We apply a dictation and an immediate reading of by the students of the schools in which we act as Pedagogical Consuellors. We have seen significant advances in children's learning. We concluded that such practice must occur constantly throughout the period of literacy in order to mobilize intervention strategies of the teacher for the students development.Keywords: Evaluation. Probing. Literacy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-277
Author(s):  
Erinn Webb

Past experiences of trauma can impede children’s learning and success. Playful interactions between skilled counsellors and students can help mitigate the impact of trauma. The author presents case examples of brief drama therapeutic interventions in a school-based program called ALIVE. The article covers the type of persona, qualities and skills cultivated by a counsellor in the ALIVE program, with comparison to medical clowns working in hospitals, pointing out the commonalities, differences and challenges involved.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-106
Author(s):  
Oliva Lago ◽  
Purificación Rodríguez ◽  
Ana Escudero ◽  
Cristina Dopico ◽  
Ileana Enesco

The current study investigated whether children’s conformity to a majority testimony influenced their willingness to revise their own erroneous counting knowledge. The content of the testimonies focused on conventional rules of counting, by means of pseudoerrors (i.e., unconventional counts) occurring during a detection task. In this work measurements were taken at two different time points. At time 1 children aged 5 to 7 years ( N = 88) first made independent judgments on the correctness of unconventional counting procedures presented by means of a computerized detection task. Subsequently, they watched a video in which four teachers (unanimous majority) or three (non-unanimous majority) made correct claims about the counts and children had to decide whether the informants were right or not, and justify their answers. Our participants conformed significantly more when the correct testimony was provided by a unanimous majority than by a non-unanimous majority. In addition, in two of the three pseudoerrors presented, there was no difference in the children’s tendency to conform to unconventional counts as age increased. At time 2, which was taken to test whether the effect of the testimony was maintained over time, the responses of the 32 children (16 from each age group) who had endorsed the claims of the unanimous majority at time 1 revealed that teachers’ testimonies only had a lasting influence on elementary school children’s understanding of conventional counting rules.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document