Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet

2018 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 63-69

Author(s):

Muhammad Zarlis ◽

Sherly Astuti ◽

Muhammad Salamuddin

Keyword(s):

Information Management ◽

Scientific Writing ◽

The Internet ◽

Reference List ◽

Management Skill ◽

Library Search ◽

Important Thing ◽

Reading Material ◽

Quality Of Research

In education, for educational instruments scientific writing is a very important thing. It requires an information management skill, information management is a library search, which can be done through a computer and guided by the internet. It can also be through the quality of reading used as a reference for scientific writing. In addition, in producing a paper also must know the management of writing, not only required to pay attention to the rules of standard language, but also must be able to convey ideas and ideas well and meet scientific criteria, such as making a quote or reference list used. This paper was written with the aim of improving the quality of research through reading material, making notes and avoiding plagiarism, references using the Harvard system for journals, books, and articles. Management of citing articles either CD or internet, writing, editing, storing references electronically, writing bibliography, and quotations.

Download Full-text

How to Provide Quality of Service Guarantees in the Internet? Lessons Learnt from the Airline and Card-Based Payment Sectors

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.1625297 ◽

2010 ◽

Author(s):

Zouhaïer M'Chirgui ◽

Thierry Pénard

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Service ◽

The Internet ◽

Service Guarantees ◽

Lessons Learnt

Download Full-text

Localized Quality of Service Routing for the Internet

10.1007/978-1-4615-0383-5 ◽

2003 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Srihari Nelakuditi ◽

Zhi-Li Zhang

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Service ◽

The Internet ◽

Quality Of Service Routing ◽

Service Routing

Download Full-text

Citizen Deliberation Online

The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion ◽

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.14 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 689-712

Author(s):

Patrícia Rossini ◽

Jennifer Stromer-Galley

Keyword(s):

Political Engagement ◽

Future Research ◽

The Internet ◽

Digital Platforms ◽

The Core ◽

Political Conversation ◽

Political Talk ◽

Citizen Deliberation ◽

The Impact

Political conversation is at the heart of democratic societies, and it is an important precursor of political engagement. As society has become intertwined with the communication infrastructure of the Internet, we need to understand its uses and the implications of those uses for democracy. This chapter provides an overview of the core topics of scholarly concern around online citizen deliberation, focusing on three key areas of research: the standards of quality of communication and the normative stance on citizen deliberation online; the impact and importance of digital platforms in structuring political talk; and the differences between formal and informal political talk spaces. After providing a critical review of these three major areas of research, we outline directions for future research on online citizen deliberation.

Download Full-text

Quality of service: delivering QoS on the internet and in corporate networks; P. Ferguson, G. Huston; Wiley, New York, 1998, 255 pages, $27.50, ISBN 0-471-24358-2

Computer Communications ◽

10.1016/s0140-3664(99)00066-3 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 22 (10) ◽

pp. 981 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yonghuan Cao ◽

Sun Hairong

Keyword(s):

New York ◽

Quality Of Service ◽

The Internet ◽

Corporate Networks

Download Full-text

THE NONRANDOM WALK OF KNOWLEDGE

Social Philosophy and Policy ◽

10.1017/s0265052521000145 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 37 (2) ◽

pp. 249-264

Author(s):

Jane R. Bambauer ◽

Saura Masconale ◽

Simone M. Sepe

Keyword(s):

Expert Testimony ◽

Selection Effect ◽

The Internet ◽

Rational Agents ◽

Social Media Platforms ◽

Wide Scale ◽

Evidence Gathering ◽

Epistemic Goals ◽

Epistemic Process

AbstractA person’s epistemic goals sometimes clash with pragmatic ones. At times, rational agents will degrade the quality of their epistemic process in order to satisfy a goal that is knowledge-independent (for example, to gain status or at least keep the peace with friends.) This is particularly so when the epistemic quest concerns an abstract political or economic theory, where evidence is likely to be softer and open to interpretation. Before wide-scale adoption of the Internet, people sought out or stumbled upon evidence related to a proposition in a more random way. And it was difficult to aggregate the evidence of friends and other similar people to the exclusion of others, even if one had wanted to. Today, by contrast, the searchable Internet allows people to simultaneously pursue social and epistemic goals.This essay shows that the selection effect caused by a merging of social and epistemic activities will cause both polarization in beliefs and devaluation of expert testimony. This will occur even if agents are rational Bayesians and have moderate credences before talking to their peers. What appears to be rampant dogmatism could be just as well explained by the nonrandom walk in evidence-gathering. This explanation better matches the empirical evidence on how people behave on social media platforms. It also helps clarify why media outlets (not just the Internet platforms) might have their own pragmatic reasons to compromise their epistemic goals in today’s competitive and polarized information market. Yet, it also makes policy intervention much more difficult, since we are unlikely to neatly separate individuals’ epistemic goals from their social ones.

Download Full-text