scholarly journals Correction to: Experimental investigation of high-viscosity oil–water flow in vertical pipes: flow patterns and pressure gradient

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 2919-2919
Author(s):  
Tarek Ganat ◽  
Syahrir Ridha ◽  
Meftah Hrairi ◽  
Juhairi Arisa ◽  
Raoof Gholami
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
MD Ferdous Wahid ◽  
Reza Tafreshi ◽  
Zurwa Khan ◽  
Albertus Retnanto

Abstract Fluid pressure gradient in a wellbore plays a significant role to efficiently transport between source and separator facilities. The mixture of two immiscible fluids manifests in various flow patterns such as stratified, dispersed, intermittent, and annular flow, which can significantly influence the fluid’s pressure gradient. However, previous studies have only used limited flow patterns when developing their data-driven model. The aim of this study is to develop a uniform data-driven model using machine-learning (ML) algorithms that can accurately predict the pressure gradient for the oil-water flow with two stratified and seven dispersed flow patterns in a horizontal wellbore. Two different machine-learning algorithms, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to predict the pressure gradients. A total of 662 experimental points from nine different flow patterns were extracted from five sources that include twelve variables for different physical properties of oil-water, wellbore’s surface roughness, and input diameter. The variables are entrance length to diameter ratio, oil and water viscosity, density, velocity, and surface tension, between oil and water surface tension, surface roughness, input diameter, and flow pattern. The algorithms’ performance was evaluated using median absolute percentage error (MdAPE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). A repeated train-test split strategy was used where the final MdAPE and RMSE were computed from the average of all repetitions. The MdAPE and RMSE for the prediction of pressure gradients are 13.89% and 0.138 kPa/m using RF and 12.17% and 0.088 kPa/m using ANN, respectively. The ML algorithms’ ability to model the pressure gradient is demonstrated using measured vs. predicted analysis where the experimental data points are mostly located in close proximity of the diagonal line, indicating a suitable generalization of the models. Comparing the performance between RF and ANN shows that the latter algorithm’s prediction accuracy is significantly better (p<0.01).


Author(s):  
Hermes Vazzoler Junior ◽  
Daiane Mieko Iceri ◽  
Juliana Cenzi ◽  
Carlos Keiichi Tanikawa da Silva ◽  
Charlie van der Geest ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duc Huu Vuong ◽  
Hong-Quan Zhang ◽  
Cem Sarica ◽  
Mingxiu Li

SPE Journal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.Q.. Q. Zhang ◽  
D.H.. H. Vuong ◽  
C.. Sarica

Summary Water is produced along with heavy oil either during the primary production or during enhanced oil recovery. Therefore, cocurrent oil/water flow is a common occurrence in heavy-oil production and transportation. Production-system design is strongly dependent on accurate predictions of the oil-/water-flow behavior. The predictions of previous mechanistic models for pressure gradient and water holdup are tested with the data acquired, and significant discrepancies are identified, especially for horizontal flow (Vuong 2009). The model performance is largely dependent on the predictions of phase inversion, distribution, and interaction. On the basis of the new understandings from experimental observations, the Zhang and Sarica (2006) unified model is modified by adding a new closure relationship for water-wetted-wall fraction in stratified flow and a new interfacial shear model based on mixing-length theory. The new model is compared with both high-viscosity and low-viscosity oil-/water-flow experimental results, and significant improvements are observed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 266-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Al-Wahaibi ◽  
Y. Al-Wahaibi ◽  
A. Al-Ajmi ◽  
R. Al-Hajri ◽  
N. Yusuf ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cengizhan Keskin ◽  
Hong-Quan Zhang ◽  
Cem Sarica

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 1019-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Yusuf ◽  
Y. Al-Wahaibi ◽  
T. Al-Wahaibi ◽  
A. Al-Ajmi ◽  
A.S. Olawale ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 116097
Author(s):  
Jing Shi ◽  
Mustapha Gourma ◽  
Hoi Yeung

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document