scholarly journals Exit Strategies in Natalizumab-Treated RRMS at High Risk of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy: a Multicentre Comparison Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora Zanghì ◽  
Antonio Gallo ◽  
Carlo Avolio ◽  
Rocco Capuano ◽  
Matteo Lucchini ◽  
...  

Abstract The main aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of ocrelizumab (OCR), rituximab (RTX), and cladribine (CLA), employed as natalizumab (NTZ) exit strategies in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients at high-risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). This is a multicentre, retrospective, real-world study on consecutive RRMS patients from eleven tertiary Italian MS centres, who switched from NTZ to OCR, RTX, and CLA from January 1st, 2019, to December 31st, 2019. The primary study outcomes were the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcome. Treatment effects were estimated by the inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW), based on propensity-score (PS) approach. Additional endpoint included confirmed disability progression (CDP) as measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale and adverse events (AEs). Patients satisfying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were 120; 64 switched to OCR, 36 to RTX, and 20 to CLA. Patients from the 3 groups did not show differences for baseline characteristics, also after post hoc analysis. The IPTW PS-adjusted models revealed that patients on OCR had a lower risk for ARR than patients on CLA (ExpBOCR 0.485, CI 95% 0.264–0.893, p = 0.020). This result was confirmed also for 12-month MRI activity (ExpBOCR 0.248 CI 95% 0.065–0.948, p = 0.042). No differences were found in other pairwise comparisons (OCR vs RTX and RTX vs CLA) for the investigated outcomes. AEs were similar among the 3 groups. Anti-CD20 drugs were revealed to be effective and safe options as NTZ exit strategies. All investigated DMTs showed a good safety profile.

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Giovannoni ◽  
Per Soelberg Sorensen ◽  
Stuart Cook ◽  
Kottil W Rammohan ◽  
Peter Rieckmann ◽  
...  

Background: In the CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets treating multiple sclerosis orallY) study, Cladribine Tablets significantly improved clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes (vs placebo) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Objective: Describe two clinically relevant definitions for patients with high disease activity (HDA) at baseline of the CLARITY study (utility verified in patients receiving placebo) and assess the treatment effects of Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg compared with the overall study population. Methods: Outcomes of patients randomised to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg or placebo were analysed for subgroups using HDA definitions based on high relapse activity (HRA; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not) or HRA plus disease activity on treatment (HRA + DAT; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not, PLUS patients with ⩾1 relapse during the year prior to study entry while on therapy with other DMDs and ⩾1 T1 Gd+ or ⩾9 T2 lesions). Results: In the overall population, Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg reduced the risk of 6-month-confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening by 47% vs placebo. A risk reduction of 82% vs placebo was seen in both the HRA and HRA + DAT subgroups (vs 19% for non-HRA and 18% for non-HRA + DAT), indicating greater responsiveness to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg in patients with HDA. There were consistent results for other efficacy endpoints. The safety profile in HDA patients was consistent with the overall CLARITY population. Conclusion: Patients with HDA showed clinical and MRI responses to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg that were generally better than, or at least comparable with, the outcomes seen in the overall CLARITY population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 1719-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Van Wijmeersch ◽  
Barry A Singer ◽  
Aaron Boster ◽  
Simon Broadley ◽  
Óscar Fernández ◽  
...  

Background: Alemtuzumab is administered as two annual courses for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients may relapse before completing the two-course regimen. Objective: The objective was to evaluate 6-year outcomes in patients who relapsed between alemtuzumab Courses 1 and 2 (early relapsers). Methods: Post hoc analysis of patients from the Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif® Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) studies who enrolled in the extension. Results: Early relapsers (CARE-MS I: 15%; CARE-MS II: 24%) had more relapses in 1–2 years pre-alemtuzumab and higher mean baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale score than patients without relapse. Their annualized relapse rate declined from Year 1 (CARE-MS I: 1.3; CARE-MS II: 1.2) to Year 2 following Course 2 (0.3; 0.5) and remained low thereafter. Over 6 years, 60% remained free of 6-month confirmed disability worsening; 24% (CARE-MS I) and 34% (CARE-MS II) achieved 6-month confirmed disability improvement. During Year 6, 69% (CARE-MS I) and 68% (CARE-MS II) were free of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity. Median percent yearly brain volume loss (Year 1: −0.67% (CARE-MS I); −0.47% (CARE-MS II)) declined after Course 2 (Year 6: −0.24%; −0.13%). Conclusion: Early relapsers’ outcomes improved after completing the second alemtuzumab course. These findings support administering the approved two-course regimen to maximize clinical benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov registration numbers: CARE-MS I, II, extension: NCT00530348, NCT00548405, NCT00930553.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 848-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Río ◽  
J Castilló ◽  
A Rovira ◽  
M Tintoré ◽  
J Sastre-Garriga ◽  
...  

Background and objective Several criteria for treatment response to interferon beta (IFNβ) have been proposed, although there is no consensus among different investigators. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical predictors of response during the first 12 months of therapy. Methods This is a prospective and longitudinal study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients treated with IFNβ. Patients were classified based on the presence of new lesions on MRI, relapses, confirmed disability increase, or combinations of all these variables after 1 year of therapy. Regression analysis was performed in order to identify variables of response after a follow-up of 3 years. Results We included 222 RRMS patients. The logistic model demonstrated that only the combination of new active lesions on MRI with the presence of relapses (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.6–12.5) or disability progression (Odds Ratio (OR) 7.1; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.6–33.9), or both (OR 6.5; 95% CI 1.9–23.4) achieved significant values to identify those patients with a poor outcome. Conclusions In RRMS patients treated with IFNβ, the combination of measures of disease activity and the presence of new active lesions on MRI may have a prognostic value for identifying patients with disease activity in the second and third year of therapy.


2020 ◽  
pp. 135245852094601
Author(s):  
Chiara Rosa Mancinelli ◽  
Cristina Scarpazza ◽  
Cinzia Cordioli ◽  
Nicola De Rossi ◽  
Sarah Rasia ◽  
...  

Discontinuation of natalizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) at risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is associated with disease reactivation. Forty-two RRMS patients, who switched from an extended interval dose (EID) of natalizumab to ocrelizumab, underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical monitoring during washout and after ocrelizumab starting. During the first 3 months, disease reactivation was observed in five (12%) patients; 6 months after ocrelizumab starting, no further relapses were recorded, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) remained stable in 38 (90%) patients. In conclusion, ocrelizumab could be considered a choice to mitigate the risk of disease reactivation in patients previously treated with natalizumab-EID.


2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. e4.18-e4
Author(s):  
E Silber ◽  
X Montalban ◽  
F Barkhof ◽  
B Khatri ◽  
HP Hartung ◽  
...  

IntroductionTo compare effects of fingolimod vs. interferon beta-1a (IFN) in achieving no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-4) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in the TRANSFORMS study. Adding Brain Volume Loss (BVL) to NEDA results in a more comprehensive and balanced measure of focal and diffuse damage.MethodsIn this post-hoc analysis, we used data from the fingolimod 0.5 mg daily (n=431) and IFN 30 µg weekly (n=435) groups. NEDA-4 was defined as absence of confirmed relapses, new/enlarging T2 lesions, 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) and BVL (annual percent brain volume change [PBVC] of >−0.4%). 3-month CDP and additional PBVC cut-offs representing mean BVL rates in healthy adults (0.2%), MS patients (0.6%), or accelerated BVL (1.2%) were also tested. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for differences between fingolimod- and IFN-treated groups.ResultsSignificantly more fingolimod (n=425) than IFN-treated patients (n=418) achieved NEDA-4 status: 27.9% vs. 16.7% (OR:1.93; 95% CI: 1.36–2.73; p=0.0002). Results were similar for other PBVC cut-offs: (>–0.2%): 20.2% vs 11.5%; 1.94; 1.30–2.90, p=0.0011; (>–0.6%): 34.6% vs 20.4%; 2.06; 1.49–2.86, p<0.0001; (>–1.2%): 40.8% vs 26.4%; 1.92; 1.42–2.60; p<0.0001.ConclusionFingolimod-treated patients had twice the odds of achieving NEDA-4 status over 1 year as patients treated with IFN.


US Neurology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Omar A Khan ◽  

The disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) available for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) have been used effectively for nearly two decades. These treatments delay the neurorodegenerative process, but do not restore lost neurological function. New oral DMDs are becoming available that offer improved convenience over existing injectable DMDs. Recently, several monoclonal antibody treatments have been developed for MS; the furthest developed is alemtuzumab (Campath-1H). In a landmark phase II clinical trial (CAMMS223) on patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS), short cycles of alemtuzumab given at baseline, at 12 months, and optionally at 24 months, demonstrated superior and sustained efficacy in terms of relapse rates and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings over the comparator compound, interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a), which was given subcutaneously and continuously. Most notably, the mean disability score for patients receiving alemtuzumab showed an unprecedented improvement, whereas for IFNβ-1a it deteriorated. Alemtuzumab in treating RRMS is the subject of two ongoing phase III trials, the results of which have the potential to change future treatments and prognoses for many patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document