Development of a Revised Conceptual Framework of Physical Training for Use in Research and Practice

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie C. Jeffries ◽  
Samuele M. Marcora ◽  
Aaron J. Coutts ◽  
Lee Wallace ◽  
Alan McCall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Physical Training ◽  
Research And Practice

A Conceptual Framework of Arctic Economies for Policy‐making, Research, and Practice

Global Policy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne Vammen Larsen ◽  
Eleanor K. Bors ◽  
Lára Jóhannsdóttir ◽  
Elena Gladun ◽  
Daria Gritsenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Research And Practice

A “recursive framework” of corruption and development

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Ato Forson
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Institutional Quality ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Development Trajectory ◽  
Improve Theory ◽  
Theory Research ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework on the relationship between corruption and development. The paper demonstrates how the impact of corruption on economic development might vary substantially from sustainable development (SD). Design/methodology/approach A combination of literature-based analysis was employed by considering concepts from corruption and development. A synthesis of these two concepts leads to the development of the conceptual framework. Findings The findings shows that corruption originates from three main sources, and that the effect of corruption on development might differ depending on how it is conceptualized, but the spate of corruption is contingent on institutional quality and gains in previous development trajectory. Originality/value Relating the concept of corruption and SD and linking it to theories of development brings a sense of novelty. This paper has in its essence contributed to the conceptualization of the relationship between corruption and development which will help deepen understanding on this contentious subject. The framework will help to improve theory, research and practice in development studies and allied fields.

A “coalesced framework” of talent management and employee performance

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Kwame Mensah
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Work Performance ◽  
Employee Performance ◽  
Talent Management ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Improve Theory ◽  
Theory Research ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework that demonstrates the mechanisms through which talent management (TM) leads to the various dimensions of employee performance. Design/methodology/approach – A literature-based analysis was employed by combining concepts from TM and employee performance. The syntheses of these two concepts lead to the development of the conceptual framework. Findings – The findings show that, implementation of a TM system leads to employee performance, but a TM output mediates the relationship between TM and employee performance. Originality/value – This paper has contributed to the conceptualisation of TM and employee performance which will help to improve theory, research and practice in all fields concerned with individual work performance.

scholarly journals Authors’ Response to Comment on: “Development of a Revised Conceptual Framework of Physical Training for Use in Research”

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Jeffries ◽  
Samuele Marcora ◽  
Aaron Coutts ◽  
Lee Wallace ◽  
Alan McCall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Physical Training

Online Healthcare Communities of Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Haitham Alali
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Communities Of Practice ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Knowledge Sharing ◽  
Online Communities ◽  
Evaluation Framework ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
Online Communities Of Practice

Online communities of practice (CoPs) are recognised as a KM initiative, whereby practitioners conduct discussions and share their experiences online. The imperative of the evaluation in measuring the effectiveness of Online CoPs fulfills its role and support for healthcare practitioners knowledge sharing has been recognized by practitioners and researchers in the KM field. Success measures of Online CoPs should support healthcare organizations in different methods; it could suggest ways to improve the design, implementation, usage, and operation of Online CoPs by addressing and understanding the main factors that impact the Online CoPs success and acceptance. Presently, establishing an evaluation framework has become essential for the advancement of research and practice in this area. The author has classified the existing researches, based on the area of evaluation. The study concludes by proposing a conceptual framework to measure the success of online CoPs in health care sector.

The FASB's Dissenting Opinions

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Bradbury ◽  
Julie A. Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
Financial Accounting Standards Board ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Over Time

SYNOPSIS This paper provides a commentary on the results of a content analysis of dissenting opinions in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) standards. During 1973 to 2009 the FASB issued 171 financial accounting standards. Half of these standards contained dissenting opinions. We identify and classify dissenting opinions based on whether the arguments are conceptual (conceptual framework-related or non-framework-related) or non-conceptual (e.g., scope, due process). We examine whether the types and frequencies of arguments change over time in response to the development of the FASB's conceptual framework and provide a commentary on the role of these opinions and the usefulness of analyzing them for research and practice. Our main finding from our analysis is that conceptual arguments are the most frequently used in the dissenting opinions, both before and after the introduction of the conceptual framework. However, of note is that many of the arguments raised, while conceptual in nature, are not from the conceptual framework. We suggest this indicates either a need for the conceptual framework language to be more widely used by the authors of dissenting opinions and/or the emergence of new conceptual arguments that may be relevant for future revisions of the conceptual framework.

scholarly journals Autoregulation in Resistance Training: Addressing the Inconsistencies

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 1873-1887
Author(s):  
Leon Greig ◽  
Ben Hayden Stephens Hemingway ◽  
Rodrigo R. Aspe ◽  
Kay Cooper ◽  
Paul Comfort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Systematic Research ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Current Review ◽  
Common Practices ◽  
Adaptation Readiness ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Broad Overview

Abstract Autoregulation is a process that is used to manipulate training based primarily on the measurement of an individual’s performance or their perceived capability to perform. Despite being established as a training framework since the 1940s, there has been limited systematic research investigating its broad utility. Instead, researchers have focused on disparate practices that can be considered specific examples of the broader autoregulation training framework. A primary limitation of previous research includes inconsistent use of key terminology (e.g., adaptation, readiness, fatigue, and response) and associated ambiguity of how to implement different autoregulation strategies. Crucially, this ambiguity in terminology and failure to provide a holistic overview of autoregulation limits the synthesis of existing research findings and their dissemination to practitioners working in both performance and health contexts. Therefore, the purpose of the current review was threefold: first, we provide a broad overview of various autoregulation strategies and their development in both research and practice whilst highlighting the inconsistencies in definitions and terminology that currently exist. Second, we present an overarching conceptual framework that can be used to generate operational definitions and contextualise autoregulation within broader training theory. Finally, we show how previous definitions of autoregulation fit within the proposed framework and provide specific examples of how common practices may be viewed, highlighting their individual subtleties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document