scholarly journals Medical Student Experience and Outcomes, as Well as Preceptor Experience, with Rapid Conversion of a Preclinical Medical School Course to a Remote-Based Learning Format in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author(s):  
David Grand ◽  
Victor L. Schuster ◽  
James M. Pullman ◽  
Ladan Golestaneh ◽  
Amanda C. Raff

Abstract Objectives To assess student outcomes and experiences, as well as preceptor experiences, after emergently converting a preclinical medical school renal course to a remote setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods First-year medical student examination scores and responses to Likert-scale questions on end-of-course evaluations from the 2018–2019 (traditional) and 2019–2020 (remote) academic years were compared. Free-text responses from students and preceptors were analyzed using a qualitative summative approach to extract major themes in perceptions of remote learning. Results Mean student scores on course examinations did not significantly differ between the traditional and remote settings (p = 0.23 and 0.84 respectively). Quantitative analysis of student evaluations revealed no significant difference across all items in mean Likert-scale responses. Student and preceptor free-text responses identified course leader engagement and responsiveness as essential to the success of remote-based learning. Optimal group size and online etiquette are areas that require attention. Conclusions Despite rapid conversion of a preclinical medical school renal course to a remote-based format in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, student scores and evaluations remain positive and largely unchanged.

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Robinson

Introduction: The educational technology of massive open online courses (MOOCs) has been successfully applied in a wide variety of disciplines and are an intense focus of educational research at this time. Educators are now looking to MOOC technology as a means to improve professional medical education, but very little is known about how medical MOOCs compare with traditional content delivery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the course evaluations for the Medicine as a Business elective by fourth year medical students at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (SIU-SOM) for the 2012-2015 academic years was conducted. This course was delivered by small group discussions for 2012-2014 and delivered via MOOC technology in 2015. Learner ratings were compared between the two course delivery methods using routinely collected course evaluations. Results: Course enrollment has ranged from 6-19 students per year in the 2012-2015 academic years. Student evaluations of the course are favorable in the areas of effective teaching, accurate course objectives, meeting personal learning objectives, recommending the course to other students, and overall when rated on a 5 point Likert scale. Ratings show no statistically significant difference between the small group or MOOC format versions of the course (p = 1.00 for all comparisons). Discussion: Students found this elective to be an effective means of meeting their personal learning objectives when delivered in a small group discussion format or by using MOOC technology. The primary advantage of this new course format is flexibility of time and place for learners, allowing them to complete the course objectives when convenient for them. The course evaluations indicate this is a change that is acceptable to the target audience. Conclusions: This study shows that learner evaluations of a fourth year medical school elective course do not significantly differ when delivered in small group discussions or via MOOC technology. This suggests that MOOCs may be a reasonable format to deliver medical school courses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-68
Author(s):  
Mandana Akbarinejad Mousavi ◽  
Mitra Amini ◽  
Somayeh Delavari ◽  
Ali Seifi

Summary Team-based learning (TBL) is a well-established instructional strategy that provides students with the chance to apply conceptual knowledge through a series of actions, including pre-class, individual, team class activity, and immediate feedback. The purpose of the present study was to introduce a course of teaching the evidence-based medicine (EBM) to all first-year medical residents in different disciplines at Shiraz Medical School in Iran country using the TBL instructional strategy. The sample included 86 medical residents at Shiraz Medical School. This study had a quasi-experimental design and was conducted in 12 sessions of evidence-based medicine (EBM) based on team-based learning (TBL) strategy. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software. In all sections, the results of Individual Readiness Assurance Tests (IRATs) and Group Readiness Assurance Tests (GRATs) were added and calculated. Cronbach’s alpha test was implemented to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaires. For the descriptive analysis of data, descriptive statistics were used. ANOVA and T-test were used for analytic analysis. There was a significant difference in answering the questions between individual (3.73 ± 2.33) and group (4.71 ± 2.29) stages. Residents gained higher average grades on working in the team (P-value < 0.02). Results of residents’ response about satisfaction questionnaire are shown that the best scores belong to group activities in TBL. The results of this study showed that TBL could be used as an effective method for residents’ education in different disciplines.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaidyn Muhandiramge ◽  
Tony Vu ◽  
Megan J. Wallace ◽  
Eva Segelov

Abstract Background Research engagement plays an integral role in developing clinicians that practice effective, evidence-based medicine. Research participation by clinicians, however, is declining. Given the link between research during medical school and future research output, promotion of medical student research is one avenue by which this shortage can be addressed. Student research attitudes and participation in Australia are not well-documented in the literature. This study therefore aims to investigate research practices, motivators, and barriers amongst Australian medical students in order to determine whether there is a need for further integration of research within Australian medical school curriculums. Methods A cross-sectional study design was used to explore research experience and attitudes, as well as the enablers and barriers to research amongst students enrolled in all years of the five-year medical course at Monash University. A questionnaire was created by combining questions from several surveys on medical student research and comprised Likert scales, multiple choice options and free-text responses assessing research experience, attitudes, motivators, and barriers. Results Seven hundred and four respondents (69.4% female; survey response rate 36.7%) reported variable research experience and interest. Less than half of the cohort (n = 296; 44.9%) had contributed to a research project. Increasing employability for specialty training programs was the primary motivating factor (n = 345; 51.9%) for pursuing research, with only 20.5% (n = 136) citing an interest in academia as a motivator. Time constraints (n = 460; 65.3%) and uncertainty surrounding how to find research opportunities (n = 449; 63.8%) were the most common barriers to research. Conclusions Medical students at Monash University are interested in but have limited experience with research. Students are, however, primarily motivated by the prospect of increasing employability for specialist training; medical schools should therefore focus on encouraging intrinsic motivation for pursuing research. Greater integration of research education and opportunities within medical school curricula may also be required to provide students with the skills necessary to both pursue research and practice evidence-based medicine.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-4
Author(s):  
Dr Iwan Fletcher ◽  
Dr Adam Joiner ◽  
Dr Anneke Muller

Background: In the context of the ongoing recruitment crisis in psychiatry, we evaluated what aspects of a school leavers’ psychiatry summer school was beneficial, and what aspects could be improved. We also considered if the summer school influenced interest in a career in psychiatry. Method: Over a three-year period, we collected and analysed Likert-scale and free-text data from a questionnaire given to school leavers at the end of the summer school. Results: School leavers found listening to a patient’s journey to recovery, interaction with doctors at different stages of training, and help with application to medical school most valuable. Feedback about the summer school was generally very positive and of the 38 school leavers involved, 61% stated they would consider a career in psychiatry following attendance. Discussion: Providing a psychiatry summer school for school leavers is a worthwhile opportunity to expose aspiring doctors to psychiatry, potentially enhancing future recruitment. We offer guidance from our learning to those considering running a similar summer school in the future.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sateesh Babu Arja ◽  
Samir Fatteh ◽  
Sailaja Nandennagari ◽  
Sai Sarath Kumar Pemma ◽  
Kumar Ponnusamy ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has required a major and rapid shift in teaching and training methods across health professions education. Physical distancing and closure of campuses required online teaching to replace face-to-face teaching. This study aims to investigate if online teaching implemented in the first two years of the medical school at Avalon University School of Medicine is serving the purpose during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsThis is a concurrent mixed research method. The quantitative data collected are course evaluations and students’ performance in assessments between the two semesters September 2019 and May 2020, which had on-campus and online teaching, respectively. Qualitative data were collected using individual interviews of 19 faculty members and students. The quantitative data were analyzed for p-values and statistical significance using a t-test. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. ResultsResults have shown no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between two semesters for course evaluations. Even if there is any difference, the mean values were better in May 2020 semester with online teaching. There was no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) even on students’ performance in assessments except for two courses. The thematic analysis of interviews revealed the advantages and disadvantages of online teaching. ConclusionsOnline teaching is serving the purpose in the first two years of the medical school during the COVID-19 pandemic. The advantages of online teaching are flexibility and comfort, and students can save time. The disadvantages are technical challenges, students lacking motivation, lack of personal interaction, and limitations on lab and hands-on experiences.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Kaljo

Introduction:  To address the country’s shortage of primary care physicians and increasing medical student debt, the Medical College of Wisconsin matriculated students into accelerated 3-year campuses in Central City and Packer City, while maintaining its traditional 4-year campus in Brew City, Wisconsin.  To ensure consistent content delivery within the basic science curriculum, students at all three campuses simultaneously participate in daily learning activities, utilizing distributed learning through a multidirectional digital classroom incorporating video-conferencing and audience response systems.     Methods:  To best uncover and understand the perspectives and attitudes of faculty and medical students, qualitative and quantitative research methods were employed framed within constructivist grounded theory.  This framework is rooted in social processes of the participants lived experiences and views these experiences as paramount to the analysis and presentation.  Prospectively, data was acquired regarding individual experiences from first-year medical students and medical school teaching faculty across the three campuses.  Beginning in the 2015–2016 academic year, nine semi-structured focus groups were conducted with concluding surveys.  These focus groups were separated by campus location: medical students at Brew City, medical students at Packer City, and faculty who taught at either the three-year regional campus or four-year campus.  In winter 2017, the study expanded including one additional student-centered focus group in Central City.  Each focus group was recorded using a hand-held device, transcribed, and analyzed using the constant comparative method.  This inductive approach required close examination of the transcriptions and line-by-line analysis to assign codes that captured the emerging themes.  To triangulate the data and further understand the medical student and faculty lived experiences, a concluding survey was distributed to participants.  This survey included eight, seven-point Likert-scale questions to further ascertain experience and overall satisfaction with the new learning environment.  Numerical data was analyzed with IBM® SPSS® 24.  This study was approved by the institutions review board. Results: In 2015–16, Packer City students rated their overall learning experience significantly (d=0.74, p<.050) higher (mean (sd)=7.6 (0.6)) than students in Brew City (6.7; 1.6) and significantly higher (d=1.21, p<.034) than the faculty (6.0 (1.0)). During 2016–17, overall learning experience scores did not differ from those of the previous years for Packer City (D=0.0) or Brew City students (D=0.0). A comparison of scores across all three campuses in 2016–17 yielded a significant change (d=1.28, p<.037) between the Central City campus (mean (sd)=7.8 (1.1)) and the Brew City campus (6.7 (0.5). No significant changes were reported between Packer City and the other two campuses.  Three overarching themes emerged from both the students and faculty throughout the study: (1) The construction of a knowledge-based community of practice, (2) responsiveness to diverse learning preference, and (3) how participants negotiated teaching and learning within the multidirectional digital classroom. Conclusion: These findings have the capacity to provide guidance when re-designing and facilitating medical school curricula and for learners who engage in new multidirectional digital environments.  Regardless of teaching site, all educators must be mindful of students’ learning needs and recognize how the overall learning experience is influenced by faculty, physical environment, and the ways in which students interact with one another daily.  


Author(s):  
Briana Christophers

This reflection chapter is from the perspective of the first-year medical student: teetering the line between the naïveté of embarking into an ambiguous future and the wisdom developing in the midst of self discovery. From the early moments of dissecting in the anatomy lab to making decisions about which content to study further during spare time, the first year of medical school sets the stage for collecting signs and symptoms into a diagnosis and a plan. This lens extends into steps for self-reflection: outline values and current needs (akin to taking your own history); reflect on interests and skills (identifying signs); consider the roles of a physician in society (coming up with a differential for who you might become); identify opportunities for the future (crafting an action plan); seek out connections with other students, trainees, and physicians (assembling a team). In this way, students can be encouraged to take a moment to center themselves in the way they will for the patients under their care to make sense of it all.


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-284
Author(s):  
John W. Schmidt ◽  
Cassie A. Eno ◽  
Jennifer A. Moss-Breen ◽  
Stephen J. Linenberger

Author(s):  
Chris N. Gu ◽  
Jane A. McElroy ◽  
Blake C. Corcoran

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of a student-run clinic on the diversification of a medical student class. We distributed a two-page, 20-item, paper survey to students of the University of Missouri School of Medicine (MU SOM) class of 2015 in July of 2011. The survey gathered information on general demographics, opinions on the importance of medical education opportunities, and opinions on the importance of medical school characteristics in applying to and attending MU SOM. A total of 104 students responded to the survey. A majority of the students identified the MedZou Community Health Clinic, a student-run, free health clinic affiliated with MU SOM, and simulated-patient encounters as important educational experiences (81% and 94%, respectively). More than half of the self-identified non-white??students reported MedZou as an important factor in their choice to apply to (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 88) and attend (71%; 95% CI, 44 to 98) MU SOM, over half of the females reported MedZou as important in their choice to apply (59%; 95% CI, 43 to 76) and attend (57%; 95% CI, 40 to 74), and over half of non-Missouri residents reported MedZou as important in their choice to apply (64%; 95% CI, 36 to 93) and attend (71%; 95% CI, 44 to 98). According to the above results, it can be said that students clearly value both MedZou and simulated-patient encounters as important educational experiences. Women, minorities, and non-Missouri residents value MedZou more highly than their peers who are First Year Medical Students who are Missouri residents, suggesting that MedZou may provide a promising opportunity to advance diversity within MU SOM. These results highlight the need for additional research to further explore MedZou?占퐏 potential to enhance the recruitment of a diverse medical student class.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document