scholarly journals Application of mathematical modeling value-at-risk (VaR) to optimize decision making in distribution networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Khorshidi ◽  
V. R. Ghezavati
Author(s):  
G. P. Samanta

This chapter deals with the measurement of Value-at-Risk parameter for a portfolio using historical returns. The main issue here is the estimation of suitable percentile of the underlying return distribution. If returns were normal variates, the task would have been very simple. But it is well documented in the literature that financial market returns seldom follow normal distribution. So, one has to identify suitable distribution, mostly other than normal, for the returns and find out the percentile of the identified distribution. The class of non-normal distribution, however, is extremely wide and heterogeneous, and one faces a decision-making problem of identifying the best distributional form from such a wide class of potential alternatives. In order to simplify the task of handling non-normality while estimating VaR, we adopt the transformation-based approach used in Samanta (2003). The performance of the transformation-based approach is compared with two widely used VaR models. Empirical results are quite encouraging and identify the transformation-based approach as a useful and sensible alternative.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0252115
Author(s):  
Qasim Noor ◽  
Tabasam Rashid ◽  
Syed Muhammad Husnine

Generally, in real decision-making, all the pieces of information are used to find the optimal alternatives. However, in many cases, the decision-makers (DMs) only want “how good/bad a thing can become.” One possibility is to classify the alternatives based on minimum (tail) information instead of using all the data to select the optimal options. By considering the opportunity, we first introduce the value at risk (VaR), which is used in the financial field, and the probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set (PIVHFS), which is the generalization of the probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS). Second, deemed value at risk (DVaR) and reckoned value at risk (RVaR) are proposed to measure the tail information under the probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy (PIVHF) environment. We proved that RVaR is more suitable than DVaR to differentiate the PIVHFEs with example. After that, a novel complete group decision-making model with PIVHFS is put forward. This study aims to determine the most appropriate alternative using only tail information under the PIVHF environment. Finally, the proposed methods’ practicality and effectiveness are tested using a stock selection example by selecting the ideal stock for four recently enrolled stocks in China. By using the novel group decision-making model under the environment of PIVHFS, we see that the best stock is E4 when the distributors focus on the criteria against 10% certainty degree and E1 is the best against the degree of 20%, 30%, 40% and 50% using the DVaR method. On the other hand when RVaR method is used then the best alternative is E4 and the worst is E2 against the different certainty degrees. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with the existing process is presented under the PHF environment to illustrate the effectiveness of the presented approaches.


2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine P. Prem ◽  
Dedy Ng ◽  
Hans J. Pasman ◽  
Mike Sawyer ◽  
Yuyan Guo ◽  
...  

Entropy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Liang-Chuan Wu ◽  
Liang-Hong Wu ◽  
Fan-Yun Pai

In this study, we used a combined stochastic process and value-at-risk (VaR) method to examine an electronic commerce expansion decision. By modeling uncertain benefits as a stochastic process, maximum losses of alternative decisions were quantified and compared to help managers to make information system/information technology (IS/IT) project decisions. Our results, based on the maximum loss perspective, demonstrated that uncertainty plays a critical role in evaluating IS/IT projects. More importantly, the results illustrate that VaR serves as a useful tool in decision-making for managers to quantify the value of maximum possible loss and to help them reach decisions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
Frank Schuhmacher ◽  
Benjamin R. Auer
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

Controlling ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 425-426
Author(s):  
Mischa Seiter ◽  
Sven Eckert
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document