Methods of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: Is Vitrification Superior to Slow Freezing?—Ovarian Tissue Freezing Methods

Author(s):  
Marisa Kometas ◽  
Gregory M Christman ◽  
Joseph Kramer ◽  
Alice Rhoton-Vlasak
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 3346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghoon Lee ◽  
Ki-Jin Ryu ◽  
Boram Kim ◽  
Dahyeon Kang ◽  
Yoon Young Kim ◽  
...  

Two methods for the cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue were compared using a xenotransplantation model to establish a safe and effective cryopreservation method. Ovarian tissues were obtained from women who underwent benign ovarian surgery in the gynecology research unit of a university hospital. The tissues were transplanted into 112 ovariectomized female severe combined immunodeficient mice 4 weeks after slow freezing or vitrification cryopreservation. Tissues were retrieved 4 weeks later. Primordial follicular counts decreased after cryopreservation and xenotransplantation, and were significantly higher in the slow freezing group than in the vitrification group (p < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry and TUNEL assay showed that the Ki-67 and CD31 markers of follicular proliferation and angiogenesis were higher in the slow freezing group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) and DNA damage was greater in the vitrification group (p < 0.001). Western blotting showed that vitrification increased cellular apoptosis. Anti-Müllerian hormone expression was low in transplanted samples subjected to both cryopreservation techniques. Electron microscopy revealed primordial follicle deformation in the vitrification group. Slow freezing for ovarian tissue cryopreservation is superior to vitrification in terms of follicle survival and growth after xenotransplantation. These results will be useful for fertility preservation in female cancer patients.


Cryobiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 546
Author(s):  
Ariadna Corral ◽  
Marcin Balcerzyk ◽  
Ángel Parrado ◽  
Christiani Amorim ◽  
Marie-Madeleine Dolmans ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 291 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silke Klocke ◽  
Nana Bündgen ◽  
Frank Köster ◽  
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter ◽  
Georg Griesinger

2014 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 775-784.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Herraiz ◽  
Edurne Novella-Maestre ◽  
Beatriz Rodríguez ◽  
César Díaz ◽  
María Sánchez-Serrano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 2534
Author(s):  
Sanghoon Lee ◽  
Hyun-Woong Cho ◽  
Boram Kim ◽  
Jae Kwan Lee ◽  
Tak Kim

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and Z-VAD-FMK (Z-VAD) as anti-apoptotic agents to preserve ovarian function and prevent tissue damage during ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation. This study consisted of two steps, in vitro and in vivo. In the first step, human ovarian tissues were cryopreserved using slow-freezing media alone, S1P, or Z-VAD (control, S1P, Z-VAD group); based on the outcomes in these groups, Z-VAD was selected for subsequent xenotransplantation. In the second step, human frozen/thawed ovarian tissues were grafted into fifty mice divided into three groups: slow-freezing/thawing and transplantation without an anti-apoptotic agent (Trans-control) and xenotransplantation with or without Z-VAD injection (Trans-Z-VAD-positive and Trams-Z-VAD-negative groups, respectively). In the first step, the Z-VAD group had a significantly higher primordial follicular count than the S1P (p = 0.005) and control groups (p = 0.04). Transplanted ovarian tissues were obtained 4 weeks after transplantation (second step). Angiogenesis was significantly increased in the Z-VAD-negative (p = 0.03) and -positive (p = 0.04) groups compared to the control group. This study demonstrated that slow-freezing and transplantation with Z-VAD is an effective method for preserving primordial follicle counts, decreasing double-strand DNA breaks, and increasing angiogenesis in a mouse model. Further molecular and clinical studies are needed to confirm these results.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pauline Jaeger ◽  
Cyrielle Fournier ◽  
Claire Santamaria ◽  
Eloise Fraison ◽  
Nicolas Morel-Journel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is one of the strategies offered to girls and women needing gonadotoxic treatment, as a means of preserving their fertility. There are two methods of ovarian tissue cryopreservation: slow freezing, the reference method, and vitrification, an alternative method. The aim of the present study was to evaluate which of the two is the best method for human ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Each ovary was divided into 3 groups: Fresh, Slow freezing and Vitrification. In each group a histological study to evaluate follicular density and quality; and an evaluation of 6 gene expression (CYP11A, STAR, GDF9, ZP3, CDK2, CDKN1A) were performed. Results: We observed no significant difference in follicular density within these 3 groups. Slow freezing altered the pool of primordial follicles compared to the Fresh tissue (31.8% vs 55.9%, p = 0.046, respectively). The expression of genes involved in steroidogenesis varied after cryopreservation compared to the fresh group; CYP11A was under-expressed in both freezing groups compared to the fresh group and significantly under-expressed in the slow freezing group (p = 0.01), STAR was over-expressed in the slow freezing group and significantly under-expressed in the vitrification group (p = 0.01). Regarding the expression of genes involved in cell cycle regulation, CDKN1A was significantly under-expressed in both freezing groups (slow freezing: p = 0.0008; vitrification: p = 0.03) compared to the fresh group. Conclusion: Vitrification had no effect on the histological quality of the follicles at any stage of development compared to Fresh tissue. There was no significant difference in gene expression between the two techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document