Rationale and results of thrombolytic therapy for deep-vein thrombosis

1992 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. S136
Author(s):  
W.A. Anthonie Lensing ◽  
J. Hirsh
2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Sousa Nanji ◽  
André Torres Cardoso ◽  
João Costa ◽  
António Vaz-Carneiro

<p>The standard treatment for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) targets to reduce immediate complications, however thrombolysis could reduce the long-term complications of post-thrombotic syndrome in the affected limb. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of thrombolytic therapy and anticoagulation <em>versus </em>anticoagulation in people with deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb through the effects on pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, major bleeding, post-thrombotic complications, venous patency and venous function. The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last search in April 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 4). A total of 17 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 1103 participants were included. In the experimental group receiving thrombolysis, complete clot lysis occurred more frequently and there was greater improvement in venous patency. The incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome decreased by a 1/3 and venous ulcers were less frequent. There were more bleeding complications and 3 strokes occurred in less recent studies, yet there seemed to be no significant effect on mortality. Data on the occurrence of pulmonary embolism and recurrent deep vein thrombosis were inconclusive. There are advantages to thrombolysis, yet the application of rigorous criteria is warranted to reduce bleeding complications. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is the current preferred method, as opposed to systemic thrombolysis in the past, and other studies comparing these procedures show that results are similar.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thrombolytic Therapy; Venous Thrombosis.</p>


1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
V V Kakkar

Thrombolytic therapy has a unique advantage in the treatment of patients suffering from thrombotic disease, since it is capable of inducing the dissolution of intravascular fibrin and thus causing the reduction or elimination of thrombi. The rapidity of thrombus removal distinguishes this form of treatment from anticoagulant therapy, in which normal physiological processes are allowed to restore the obstructed circulation. By quickly removing the obstruction, it should be possible to reduce the mortality arising from acute thromboembolic episodes.The results of therapy for deep-vein thrombosis have been fairly uniform. The published studies can be broadly classified into two main groups; in uncontrolled trials, partial or complete lysis of thrombi was obtained in approximately 65-80% of the patients who received streptokinase, while only 10-25% of the patients receiving heparin showed this change.In patients suffering from acute major or massive pulmonary embolism, a number of trials have demonstrated a more rapid resolution of the embolus than would be expected by treatment with heparin alone.The role of lytic therapy in preventing the late sequelae of deep vein thrombosis at present remains uncertian. Studies involving large numbers of patients and longer periods of follow-up are required to determine the extent to which post phlebitic venous insufficiency is reduced by early thrombolytic therapy.


1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (03) ◽  
pp. 660-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C W van de Loo ◽  
A Kriessmann ◽  
G Trübestein ◽  
K Knoch ◽  
C A M de Swart ◽  
...  

SummaryThirty-three patients with acute iliofemoral thrombosis were randomly assigned to three treatment groups in a pilot doseranging study of thrombolytic therapy in deep vein thrombosis. One group received tissue culture urokinase in a dose of 2,200 I.U./kg/hr, and a second group in a dose of 1,100 I.U./kg/hr following a loading dose of 4,400 I.U./kg given in ten min. Urokinase was administered for 12 hr periods, alternating with 12 hr periods of heparin. A third group received an initial dose of 250,0001.U. of streptokinase in 20 min, followed by 100,000 I.U./hr. Treatment of all patients continued for three days. At the end of this period little improvement, evaluated by “blinded” interpretation of pre- and post-treatment phlebograms, was found in five out of ten of the higher-dose urokinase patients, seven out of eleven of lower-dosage urokinase patients, and six out of ten of streptokinase patients. Optional treatment for another three days showed little further improvement of urokinase-patients and moderate further improvement in the streptokinase-patients. – Neither of the 2 dosage schemes at intermittent application of urokinase appeared to be advantageous. Urokinase treated patients experienced fewer adverse reactions.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Leslie Raffini

Goldenberg and colleagues' retrospective analysis of pediatric patients with high-risk, occlusive lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) suggests that thrombolytic therapy with tPA (with or without mechanical thrombolysis) may decrease the risk of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS).


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 2293-2300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Maleux ◽  
Pieter Marchal ◽  
Marleen Palmers ◽  
Sam Heye ◽  
Peter Verhamme ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document