Immuno electron microscopic localization of subcellular fibrillar elements using the unlabeled antibody enzyme method

1979 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. de Brabander ◽  
J. de Meyt ◽  
M. Joniautt ◽  
G. Geuens
Pathology ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.P. McCausland ◽  
R.N. Seelye ◽  
J.B. Gavin ◽  
P.B. Herdson

1974 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 782-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN P. PETRALI ◽  
DENNIS M. HINTON ◽  
GWEN C. MORIARTY ◽  
LUDWIG A. STERNBERGER

Araldite sections of rat pituitary intermediate lobe were used with anti-17-39 adrenocorticotropin in the unlabeled antibody enzyme method to compare electron microscopic immunocytochemical staining by peroxidase-antiperoxidase complex (PAP) with antiserum or purified antibody to peroxidase followed by peroxidase (PO). Quantitation of normalized optical densities of secretory granules offered high significance comparison (P < 0.0001) of experimental with control values and of experimental values with each other. Use of purified antibody (prepared by a new density gradient method) yielded four times higher sensitivity than antiserum to PO, while a 6.5-fold increase would have been expected from the degree of contamination of anti-PO in the serum by nonanti-PO immunoglobulin. Use of PAP was four to five times more sensitive than purified anti-PO and 20 times more sensitive than antiserum to PO. The increased sensitivity of PAP is explained by the high over-all binding affinity of PO for anti-PO in the cyclic PAP molecule, thus preventing the losses of PO that occur during washing when anti-PO and PO have been applied in sequence. Identification of the characteristic, cyclic PAP molecules affords confirmation of specific staining at high resolution. In the sequential application of anti-PO and PO, no PAP molecules are formed, thus making distinction of specific from nonspecific deposition of enzyme reaction products ambiguous. With the use of anti-17-39 ACTH and the intermediate lobe, the unlabeled antibody enzyme method was 16,000-100,000 times more sensitive than radioimmunoassay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document