P-1-15 Short-term availability of brain serotonin is crucial for antidepressant effect of light therapy

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
A. Neurmeister ◽  
N. Rieder ◽  
B. Hesselmann ◽  
S. Kasper
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotao Li

AbstractBackgroundLight therapy is frequently demonstrated by clinical trials to be effective to seasonal or non-seasonal major depression. However, the pathway underlying the light effect on mood remains unclear. Since a retino-raphe pathway was previously indicated to modulate 5-HT production, we hypothesize that the retinal projection into dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) may play an important role in the light therapy for depression.MethodsA rat model of 14-day corticosterone administration (40 mg/kg/day subcutaneous injection) was mainly used to test the effect of light therapy on non-seasonal depressant-like behavior, and the involved neural circuitry and neurochemistry as well.ResultsBehavior results revealed that the bright light therapy especially with the blue light of 470 nm and 400 lux, effectively reversed the depression-like responses in those stressed rats. After elimination of retino-raphe projection using immunotoxin (Saporin) the effect of light therapy was significantly attenuated. Whereas activation of retino-raphe projection using HM3q chemogenetics was shown an effect similar to fluoxetine treatment. Furthermore, 5-HT3A positive GABA cells in the DRN were activated with high c-Fos expression that involved in an inhibition of 5-HT synthesis and a subsequent depressive behavior. While light therapy through retino-raphe projection deactivated the hyperaction of those GABA cells in the DRN; that eventually contributed to the antidepressant effect from light therapy.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the retino-raphe circuitry engaged antidepressant effect in DRN that contributed to the light therapy to the non-seasonal depression. 5-HT3A positive GABA cells in DRN was indicated to mediate this function of retino-raphe projection.


1985 ◽  
Vol 147 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. James ◽  
Thomas A. Wehr ◽  
David A. Sack ◽  
Barbara L. Parry ◽  
Norman E. Rosenthal

A cross-over comparison study of exposure, in the evenings only, to bright versus dim light was carried out on nine female patients with seasonal affective disorder. A significant antidepressant effect of the bright lights was shown. No consistent observable effects were produced by the dim lights. These results support earlier studies demonstrating the efficacy of bright light given morning and evening. The antidepressant effect of light is not mediated by sleep deprivation, and the early morning hours are not crucial for a response.


1995 ◽  
Vol 166 (5) ◽  
pp. 607-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Meesters ◽  
J. H. C. Jansen ◽  
D. G. M. Beersma ◽  
A. L. Bouhuys ◽  
R. H. Van Den Hoofdakker

BackgroundSixty-eight patients with seasonal affective disorder participated in a 10 000-lux light treatment study in which two questions were addressed: do response rates differ when the light is applied at different times of the day and does short-term rank ordering of morning and evening light influence response rates?MethodThree groups of patients received a 4-day light treatment: (I) in the morning (8.00–8.30 a.m., n = 14), (II) in the afternoon (1.00–1.30 p.m., n = 15) or (III) in the evening (8.00–8.30 p.m., n = 12). Two additional groups of patients received two days of morning light treatment followed by two days of evening light (IV, n = 13) or vice versa (V, n = 14).ResultsResponse rates for groups I, II and III were 69, 57 and 80% respectively, with no significant differences between them. Response rates for groups IV and V were 67 and 50% respectively; this difference was not significant and these percentages did not differ significantly from those of groups I and III.ConclusionsThe results indicate that the timing of light treatment is not critical and that short-term rank ordering of morning and evening light does not influence therapeutic outcome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (12) ◽  
pp. 1344-1353
Author(s):  
Qinghe Meng ◽  
Jianjun Jiang ◽  
Xiaohong Hou ◽  
Lixia Jia ◽  
Xiaoxiao Duan ◽  
...  

Abstract Blue light has been previously reported to play a salient role in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder. The present study aimed to investigate whether blue light had antidepressant effect on light-deprivation-induced depression model, and the underlying visual neural mechanism. Blue light mitigated depression-like behaviors induced by light deprivation as measured by elevated sucrose preference and reduced immobility time. Blue light enhanced melanopsin expression and light responses in the retina. We also found the upregulation of serotonin and brain derived neurotrophic factor expression in the c-fos-positive areas of rats treated with blue light compared with those maintained in darkness. The species gap between nocturnal albino (Sprague-Dawley rat) and diurnal pigmented animals (human) might have influenced extrapolating data to humans. Blue light has antidepressant effect on light-deprived Sprague-Dawley rats, which might be related to activating the serotonergic system and neurotrophic activity via the retinoraphe and retinoamygdala pathways. Blue light is the effective component of light therapy for treatment of depression.


1994 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Dam ◽  
Jeanne Molin ◽  
Tom G. Bolwig ◽  
Gordon Wildschiodtz ◽  
Erling T. Mellerup

2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. LAM ◽  
T. A. BOWERING ◽  
E. M. TAM ◽  
A. GREWAL ◽  
L. N. YATHAM ◽  
...  

Background. Serotonergic mechanisms have been proposed for the pathophysiology of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) and the therapeutic effect of bright-light treatment. Previously, we showed that SAD patients, in clinical remission with light therapy during the winter, experienced transient depressive relapses after a rapid tryptophan depletion (RTD) technique, which results in decreased brain serotonin levels. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of RTD in SAD patients who were in natural summer remission.Methods. Twelve drug-free patients with SAD by DSM-IV criteria and 10 normal subjects participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. SAD patients were in natural summer remission for at least 8 weeks. Behavioural ratings and plasma tryptophan levels were obtained before, and 5 h after, ingesting an amino acid (AA) mixture±tryptophan. Experimental RTD and control sessions were scheduled 1 week apart.Results. The RTD session resulted in significant reduction in total and free plasma tryptophan levels compared to the control session. The behavioural data were analysed using repeated measures analysis of variance. This analysis found significant main effects of time (higher scores after AA ingestion) and diagnosis (higher scores in SAD patients), but no main effect of session or significant interaction effects between the three factors. Thus, there were no significant behavioural effects of RTD compared to the sham depletion control session.Conclusions. The summer remission experienced by SAD patients is not dependent on plasma tryptophan levels (and presumably brain serotonin function) in the same manner as that of remission after light therapy. These results conflict with those of other laboratories, perhaps because of differences in study samples.


2001 ◽  
Vol 104 (3 & 4) ◽  
pp. 158-163
Author(s):  
Michael C. Quist ◽  
Christopher S. Guy ◽  
James L. Stephen

1985 ◽  
Vol 142 (9) ◽  
pp. 1130-b-1130
Author(s):  
PETR SKRABANEK

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document