MEAT, ANIMAL, POULTRY AND FISH PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT | Meat Production in Organic Farming

Author(s):  
J.E. Hermansen ◽  
K. Horsted ◽  
A.G. Kongsted
Author(s):  
Karoline A. Henke ◽  
Thomas Alter ◽  
Marcus G. Doherr ◽  
Roswitha Merle

Contamination with potentially pathogenic microorganisms may occur at all stages of the food chain. We conducted a representative cross-sectional survey of 1008 consumers aged 16 years and older in Germany via an online panel; the aim was to assess the perception of consumers regarding the influence of aspects of meat production on the safety and quality of meat. Over 70 % of the participants indicated that poultry fattening farms had a “high or very high” influence on meat safety, followed by cooks or meat preparers (66.3 %). Meat consumption was significantly associated with a high perception of the influence of cooks or meat preparers (p=0.025). The oldest participants were almost three times as likely to vote “high influence” and six times as likely to select “very high influence” (instead of “no or limited”) as the youngest participants (high influence: OR = 2.89, p = 0.016; very high influence: OR = 6.06, p < 0.001). Of all participants, 78.1 % believed organic farming had a positive influence on the safety of meat compared to conventional farming.  Participants over 60 years voted significantly more frequently than youngest participants (16-19 years) that organic farming had no influence (p=0.006; OR= 5.71) or positive influence (p= 0.007; OR 3.93) on meat safety. In addition, it could be shown that majority of consumer believe that irradiation of meat had a negative influence on the safety of meat. In conclusion, consumers were aware that many aspects were important for food safety and quality. The influence of organic farming compared to conventional farming as well as the influence of irradiation was often incorrectly assessed by consumers. Consumers seemed to need more information on sensitive issues such as the different types of farming or the effects of irradiation, to assess the impact of these aspects on the safety and quality of meat better.


1986 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
GE Ford

The roles of six carnivores as potential sources to sheep of the sarcosporidial parasites causing cysts in meat were compared in a series of experiments carried out between 1973 and 1980. The research was concomitant with other studies that confirmed the prey-predator-prey-predator cycle of transmission. Infected carnivores act as vectors, excreting in their faeces coccidial sporocysts infective to the meat animal. For 60 experimental infections, sheep meat containing sarcocysts or sarcocysts removed from sheep meat were fed to experimental carnivores. Faecal samples were examined for sporocysts over 60 days post infection. Neither macroscopic (visible) sarcocysts nor microscopic sarcocysts from sheep carcasses were transmissible by humans or by ferrets (domestic polecats). Microscopic sarcocysts were readily infective to dogs, both domestic and dingo, as well as to foxes, but not to cats. Large numbers of sporocysts that could contaminate the environment were excreted. Both fat and thin visible sarcocysts were transmitted exclusively to cats. Although cats responded with relatively low levels of sporocysts, these were considered adequate to provide sufficient pasture contamination for the life cycle to be perpetuated. It is concluded that, while domestic dogs may be the greatest source of infection for sheep with microscopic sarcocysts, foxes as vectors also pose a threat to sheep production. Similarly, due to their widespread presence, feral cats play a role as well as domestic or semi-domestic cats in the spread of sarcocysts causing visible carcass lesions.


Author(s):  
F.R. Dunshea ◽  
D.N. D'Souza ◽  
B.B. Jensen ◽  
R.M. Engberg

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro L. Fajardo-Zapata ◽  
Francy J. Méndez-Casallas ◽  
Luis H. Molina

<p><strong></strong>The production of meat for human consumption is one of the important items in the economy of a country. This activity has great socio economic importance as it serves as a basis for development, employment generation and sustainability of a country. The demand for animal protein is one of the most precious and necessary factors to maintain a proper biological development of human beings in active growth as well as being a source of growth and tissue regeneration. Consumption has increased because populations continue to grow and there is continuous migration to the cities, which makes the offer insufficient, and therefore it is necessary to accelerate, introduce technology and improve the meat production process. Industry also seeks a reduction in production costs by producers in this sector of the economy, leading to the use and incorporation of technology and cutting-edge knowledge to improve yield production of meat. Such knowledge comprises the scientific basis of the use of growth hormones and promoters (anabolic steroids and others) to accelerate and increase the production of meat. Although there has been an increase in production, residual substances can remain in the meat intended for human consumption which can lead to changes in the health of consumers.</p> <p><strong>Key words</strong>: growth promoter, meat, animal production</p><br />


Animals ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Buddle ◽  
Heather Bray ◽  
Rachel Ankeny

Concern for livestock welfare is significantly increasing in many parts of the world. One area of concern is the transportation of livestock. Using qualitative research methods, this research explores the concerns of Australian meat consumers related to livestock transportation practices, both on land by truck and on sea by ship. Participants were predominantly concerned about animals being “crammed” into trucks and ships, and the long distances over which livestock were transported. Likely contributors to these reactions are the high visibility of truck transport in urban areas, and recent media and political attention to the live-export issue in Australia. We argue that participants’ concerns about transport are arising for a variety of reasons, including anthropomorphic tendencies, genuine concern for the welfare of farm animals, and emotional responses related to the discomfort experienced by meat consumers when they are reminded of the meat-animal connection. Given the importance of transport to the red-meat production industry, these results suggest that the sector may need to reconsider some of their practices and increase transparency and communication about the practices, which they utilise to ensure good animal welfare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document