Theoretical neuroscience

Author(s):  
Marcelo Victor Pires de Sousa ◽  
Marucia Chacur ◽  
Daniel Oliveira Martins ◽  
Carlo Rondinoni
Author(s):  
John P. Spencer ◽  
Vanessa R. Simmering ◽  
Anne R. Schutte ◽  
Gregor Schöner

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1330
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Cofré ◽  
Cesar Maldonado ◽  
Bruno Cessac

The Thermodynamic Formalism provides a rigorous mathematical framework for studying quantitative and qualitative aspects of dynamical systems. At its core, there is a variational principle that corresponds, in its simplest form, to the Maximum Entropy principle. It is used as a statistical inference procedure to represent, by specific probability measures (Gibbs measures), the collective behaviour of complex systems. This framework has found applications in different domains of science. In particular, it has been fruitful and influential in neurosciences. In this article, we review how the Thermodynamic Formalism can be exploited in the field of theoretical neuroscience, as a conceptual and operational tool, in order to link the dynamics of interacting neurons and the statistics of action potentials from either experimental data or mathematical models. We comment on perspectives and open problems in theoretical neuroscience that could be addressed within this formalism.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 902-904
Author(s):  
Alexander Peyser ◽  
Sandra Diaz Pier ◽  
Wouter Klijn ◽  
Abigail Morrison ◽  
Jochen Triesch

Large-scale in silico experimentation depends on the generation of connectomes beyond available anatomical structure. We suggest that linking research across the fields of experimental connectomics, theoretical neuroscience, and high-performance computing can enable a new generation of models bridging the gap between biophysical detail and global function. This Focus Feature on ”Linking Experimental and Computational Connectomics” aims to bring together some examples from these domains as a step toward the development of more comprehensive generative models of multiscale connectomes.


Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 338 (6103) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wulfram Gerstner ◽  
Henning Sprekeler ◽  
Gustavo Deco

Modeling work in neuroscience can be classified using two different criteria. The first one is the complexity of the model, ranging from simplified conceptual models that are amenable to mathematical analysis to detailed models that require simulations in order to understand their properties. The second criterion is that of direction of workflow, which can be from microscopic to macroscopic scales (bottom-up) or from behavioral target functions to properties of components (top-down). We review the interaction of theory and simulation using examples of top-down and bottom-up studies and point to some current developments in the fields of computational and theoretical neuroscience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document