Quality Assurance of 3D Printed Anatomic Models

Author(s):  
Nicole Wake ◽  
Benjamin Johnson ◽  
Shuai Leng
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Toro ◽  
Aura Cardona ◽  
Daniel Restrepo ◽  
Laura Buitrago

Abstract Background Material extrusion is used to 3D print anatomic models and guides. Sterilization is required if a 3D printed part touches the patient during an intervention. Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) is one method of sterilization. There are four factors to consider when sterilizing an anatomic model or guide: sterility, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and geometric fidelity. This project focuses on geometric fidelity for material extrusion of one polymer acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) using VHP. Methods De-identified computed tomography (CT) image data from 16 patients was segmented using Mimics Innovation Suite (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). Eight patients had maxillary and mandibular defects depicted with the anatomic models, and eight had mandibular defects for the anatomic guides. Anatomic models and guides designed from the surfaces of CT scan reconstruction and segementation were 3D printed in medical-grade acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material extrusion. The 16 parts underwent low-temperature sterilization with VHP. The dimensional error was estimated after sterilization by comparing scanned images of the 3D printed parts. Results The average of the estimated mean differences between the printed pieces before and after sterilization were − 0,011 ± 0,252 mm (95%CI − 0,011; − 0,010) for the models and 0,003 ± 0,057 mm (95%CI 0,002; 0,003) for the guides. Regarding the dimensional error of the sterilized parts compared to the original design, the estimated mean differences were − 0,082 ± 0,626 mm (95%CI − 0,083; − 0,081) for the models and 0,126 ± 0,205 mm (95%CI 0,126, 0,127) for the guides. Conclusion This project tested and verified dimensional stability, one of the four prerequisites for introducing vaporized hydrogen peroxide into 3D printing of anatomic models and guides; the 3D printed parts maintained dimensional stability after sterilization.


2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. E697-E698
Author(s):  
P. McGeachy ◽  
D.K. Sasaki ◽  
C. Harris ◽  
A.M. Sharma ◽  
A. Dubey

Materials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darío Quiñones ◽  
David Soler-Egea ◽  
Víctor González-Pérez ◽  
Johanna Reibke ◽  
Elena Simarro-Mondejar ◽  
...  

In OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries, cancer is one of the main causes of death, lung cancer being one of the most aggressive. There are several techniques for the treatment of lung cancer, among which radiotherapy is one of the most effective and least invasive for the patient. However, it has associated difficulties due to the moving target tumor. It is possible to reduce the side effects of radiotherapy by effectively tracking a tumor and reducing target irradiation margins. This paper presents a custom electromechanical system that follows the movement of a lung tumor. For this purpose, a hysteresis loop of human lung movement during breathing was studied to obtain its characteristic movement equation. The system is controlled by an Arduino, steppers motors and a customized 3D printed mechanism to follow the characteristic human breathing, obtaining an accurate trajectory. The developed device helps the verification of individualized radiation treatment plans and permits the improvement of radiotherapy quality assurance procedures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeonho Choi ◽  
Ik Jae Lee ◽  
Kwangwoo Park ◽  
Kyung Ran Park ◽  
Yeona Cho ◽  
...  

This study aims to confirm the usefulness of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) using three-dimensional (3D)-printed phantoms in ensuring the stability of IORT and the precision of the treatment administered. In this study, five patient-specific chest phantoms were fabricated using a 3D printer such that they were dosimetrically equivalent to the chests of actual patients in terms of organ density and shape around the given target, where a spherical applicator was inserted for breast IORT treatment via the INTRABEAM™ system. Models of lungs and soft tissue were fabricated by applying infill ratios corresponding to the mean Hounsfield unit (HU) values calculated from CT scans of the patients. The two models were then assembled into one. A 3D-printed water-equivalent phantom was also fabricated to verify the vendor-provided depth dose curve. Pieces of an EBT3 film were inserted into the 3D-printed customized phantoms to measure the doses. A 10 Gy prescription dose based on the surface of the spherical applicator was delivered and measured through EBT3 films parallel and perpendicular to the axis of the beam. The shapes of the phantoms, CT values, and absorbed doses were compared between the expected and printed ones. The morphological agreement among the five patient-specific 3D chest phantoms was assessed. The mean differences in terms of HU between the patients and the phantoms was 2.2 HU for soft tissue and −26.2 HU for the lungs. The dose irradiated on the surface of the spherical applicator yielded a percent error of −2.16% ± 3.91% between the measured and prescribed doses. In a depth dose comparison using a 3D-printed water phantom, the uncertainty in the measurements based on the EBT3 film decreased as the depth increased beyond 5 mm, and a good agreement in terms of the absolute dose was noted between the EBT3 film and the vendor data. These results demonstrate the applicability of the 3D-printed chest phantom for PSQA in breast IORT. This enhanced precision offers new opportunities for advancements in IORT.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Metz ◽  
P. Franz ◽  
C. Fischer ◽  
V. Wachtendorf ◽  
C. Maierhofer

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 2015-2024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan Yamabe Breitkreutz ◽  
Spencer Bialek ◽  
Boris Vojnovic ◽  
Anthony Kavanagh ◽  
Christopher D. Johnstone ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 074005
Author(s):  
Dante P I Capaldi ◽  
Lawrie B Skinner ◽  
Piotr Dubrowski ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Lei Xing ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e0181560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Woon Yea ◽  
Jae Won Park ◽  
Sung Kyu Kim ◽  
Dong Youn Kim ◽  
Jae Gu Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document