Effects of hydroponic systems on yield, water productivity and stomatal gas exchange of greenhouse tomato cultivars

2021 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 107171
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Fayezizadeh ◽  
Naser Alam Zadeh Ansari ◽  
Mohammad Albaji ◽  
Esmail Khaleghi
Keyword(s):  
Gas Exchange ◽  
Water Productivity ◽  
Greenhouse Tomato ◽  
Tomato Cultivars ◽  
Hydroponic Systems

scholarly journals Yield of Greenhouse Tomato with Constant or Intermittent Heating of the Root and Shoot

HortScience ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 607d-607
Author(s):  
M.P.N. Gent ◽  
Y.-Z. Ma
Keyword(s):  
Lycopersicon Esculentum ◽  
Diurnal Variation ◽  
Air Temperature ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Constant Heat ◽  
Greenhouse Tomato ◽  
Air Temperatures ◽  
Intermittent Heating ◽  
Tomato Cultivars ◽  
Constant Heating

Is intermittent heating of the root zone more beneficial than constant heating for production of greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill), with diurnal variation of air temperature (DIF)? Yields were compared with 14°C day/14°C night or 22°C day/6°C night minimum air temperatures, resulting in 5 and 14°C DIF. The root zone was unheated or was heated to 20°C constantly or for 6 hours in the day, or 6 hours in the night. The greenhouse tomato cultivars Buffalo and Caruso were transplanted in early and late March in 1994 and 1995. Averaged over both years and cultivars, the yield from early March planting with 14°C DIF was greater than with 5°C DIF, 6.6 and 6.1 kg/plant, respectively, due to an increase in weight per fruit and to earlier ripening. Root zone heat increased yield compared to no heat, due to a greater number of fruit. With 5°C DIF, yields with constant and intermittent root zone heat were similar. The yields were 5.4, 6.4, 6.2, and 6.2 kg/plant with none, day, night and constant heat, respectively. With 14°C DIF, there were larger differences in yield, 5.7, 7.0, 6.6, and 7.1 kg/plant with none, day, night and constant root zone heat, respectively. However, interactions between air and root heat regimes were not statistically significant. The yield from late March planting was greater with 14°C than with 5°C DIF, but root zone heat had no effect. Research supported in part by grant 93-37100-9101 from NRI Competitive grants program/USDA.

scholarly journals Effects of Cultivars and Culture Systems on Yield and Postharvest Quality of Greenhouse Tomato

HortScience ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 847D-847
Author(s):  
Serge Gagnon ◽  
Mohamed Mzouri ◽  
André Gosselin
Keyword(s):  
Shelf Life ◽  
Fruit Quality ◽  
Culture System ◽  
Soluble Sugars ◽  
Postharvest Quality ◽  
Culture Systems ◽  
Titrable Acidity ◽  
Greenhouse Tomato ◽  
Tomato Cultivars

Our purpose was to determine cultivar and culture system effects on yield and postharvest quality of greenhouse tomato Lycopersicon esculentum. Nine tomato cultivars were sown into rockwool cubes on 2 Feb. 1994. The plants were transplanted into peat bags or nutrient film (NFT) systems on 9 Mar. Harvesting began on 2 May until 26 Sept. for a total of 21 harvest weeks. Fruit yield, rejected or nonmarketable fruit and four fruit quality indicators (fruit texture, color, titrable acidity, and soluble sugars) were measured during the harvest period. In addition, these indicators were further evaluated every 7 days during 28 days of storage at 20C and 90% RH for `Trust' and `Cencara', a long shelf-life cultivar. `Bounty', `Panther', and `Cencara' gave higher yields on rockwool but `Irazu', `Correct', `73-53', and `Medallion' gave better results on NFT. `Trust' produced the best yield for either rockwool or NFT. Culture systems (peat bags or NFT) did not affect fruit quality. `Cencara', which is a long shelf-life cultivar, kept high texture quality until 28 days of storage. However, titrable acidity of `Cencara' was higher and soluble sugars content was lower than that of `Trust'

Leaf gas-exchange characteristics of four Japanese and four Dutch tomato cultivars grown in a greenhouse

2013 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Matsuda ◽  
Dong-Hyuk Ahn ◽  
Akimasa Nakano ◽  
Katsumi Suzuki ◽  
Masuyuki Takaichi
Keyword(s):  
Gas Exchange ◽  
Leaf Gas Exchange ◽  
Tomato Cultivars ◽  
Gas Exchange Characteristics

scholarly journals Yield and Russeting of Greenhouse Tomato as Influenced by Leaf-to-fruit Ratio and Relative Humidity

HortScience ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 503-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique-André Demers ◽  
Martine Dorais ◽  
Athanasios P. Papadopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Relative Humidity ◽  
Lycopersicon Esculentum ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Greenhouse Tomato ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Number Of Leaves ◽  
Tomato Cultivars ◽  
Very High

Three experiments were conducted in greenhouses 1) to determine the optimal leaf-to-fruit ratio for minimizing the incidence of russeting (miniature cuticle cracks on fruit) while optimizing fruit yield of greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and 2) to investigate the effect of day/night relative humidity (RH) regimens on the development of russeting. Leaf-to-fruit ratio treatments (0.5–2.0) were achieved by varying the number of fruit (two to six fruit) per cluster and the number of leaves (two to four leaves) between clusters. In one experiment, plants were also subjected to either high day/low night or low day/high night RH regimens (low RH, 60% to 70%; high RH, 85% to 95%). Results showed that russeting of greenhouse tomato was mostly influenced by the number of fruit per cluster (total fruit load), and very little by the number of leaves between clusters. In general, decreasing the number of fruit per cluster resulted in a progressive increase in the occurrence of russeting. Furthermore, as the number of fruit per cluster decreased, the percentage of fruit with no russeting and with little russeting decreased whereas the percentage of fruit with the more severe russeting increased (except for the summer). For beefsteak cultivars Trust and Rapsodie grown under southwestern Ontario conditions, the best pruning practices for minimizing russeting and optimizing yield was to prune clusters to three fruit in early spring and late fall, to four fruit during spring and fall, and to five fruit during the summer, with three leaves between clusters all year long. In the current study, no significant effect of day/night RH regimens on fruit russeting was observed. Of the cultivars used, Rz 74/56 was less sensitive to russeting than ‘Trust’, whereas ‘Rapsodie’ was not different from the two other cultivars. However, all three cultivars had a very high incidence of russeting (>65% of fruit affected), and none should be regarded as russeting resistant. Breeding programs and genetic investigations with the objective of developing greenhouse tomato cultivars resistant to russeting are needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document