Emergency department visits for dental problems among adults with private dental insurance: A national observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
Troy B. Amen ◽  
Inkyu Kim ◽  
Gregory Peters ◽  
Alba Gutiérrez-Sacristán ◽  
Nathan Palmer ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Lo Giudice ◽  
Eleonora Mocciaro ◽  
Claudia Giardina ◽  
Maria Antonietta Barbieri ◽  
Giuseppe Cicala ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Martos-Pérez ◽  
M D Martín-Escalante ◽  
J Olalla-Sierra ◽  
J L Prada-Pardal ◽  
M D García-de-Lucas ◽  
...  

Summary Background Many Spanish hospitals converted scheduled in-person visits to telephone visits during the COVID-19 lockdown. There is scarce information about the performance of those visits. Aim To compare telephone visits during the COVID-19 lockdown period with previous in-person visits. Design Retrospective descriptive study. Methods Telephone visits from 15 March to 31 May 2020 were compared with in-person visits during the same period in 2019. Main measures The proportions of both groups were compared in term of failure to contact patient, requested diagnostic tests/referrals, discharges, admissions and emergency visits within 30–60 days. A sample of patients, and all participating physicians completed surveys. Z-score test was used (statistical significance P<0.05). Results A total of 5602 telephone visits were conducted. In comparison to in-person visits, telephone visits showed higher rates of visit compliance (95.9% vs. 85.2%, P<0.001) and discharges (22.12% vs. 11.82%; P<0.001), and lower number of ancillary tests and referrals. During the 30- and 60-day periods following the telephone visit, a reduction of 52% and 47% in the combined number of emergency department visits and hospital admissions was observed compared to in-person visits (P<0.01). Of the 120 patients surveyed, 95% were satisfied/very satisfied with the telephone visits. Of the 26 physicians, 84.6% considered telephone visits were useful to prioritize patients. Conclusions During health emergencies, previously scheduled outpatient in-person visits can be converted to telephone visits, reducing absenteeism, increasing the rate of discharges and reducing ancillary tests and referrals without increasing the rate of hospital admissions or emergency department visits.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Rising ◽  
Marianna D. LaNoue ◽  
Angela M. Gerolamo ◽  
Amanda M.B. Doty ◽  
Alexzandra T. Gentsch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sara Campagna ◽  
Alberto Borraccino ◽  
Gianfranco Politano ◽  
Alfredo Benso ◽  
Marco Dalmasso ◽  
...  

Background: Allowing patients to remain at home and decreasing the number of unnecessary emergency room visits have become important policy goals in modern healthcare systems. However, the lack of available literature makes it critical to identify determinants that could be associated with increased emergency department (ED) visits in patients receiving integrated home care (IHC). Methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out in a large Italian region among patients with at least one IHC event between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. IHC is administered from 8 am to 8 pm by a team of physicians, nurses, and other professionals as needed based on the patient’s health conditions. A clinical record is opened at the time a patient is enrolled in IHC and closed after the last service is provided. Every such clinical record was defined as an IHC event, and only ED visits that occurred during IHC events were considered. Sociodemographic, clinical and IHC variables were collected. A multivariate, stepwise logistic analysis was then performed, using likelihood of ED visit as a dependent variable. Results: A total of 29 209 ED visits were recorded during the 66 433 IHC events that took place during the observation period. There was an increased risk of ED visits in males (odds ratio [OR]=1.29), younger patients, those with a family caregiver (OR=1.13), and those with a higher number of cohabitant family members. Long travel distance from patients’ residence to the ED reduced the risk of ED visits. The risk of ED visits was higher when patients were referred to IHC by hospitals or residential facilities, compared to referrals by general practitioners. IHC events involving patients with neoplasms (OR=1.91) showed the highest risk of ED visits. Conclusion: Evidence of sociodemographic and clinical determinants of ED visits may offer IHC service providers a useful perspective to implement intervention programmes based on appropriate individual care plans and broad-based client assessment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document