A systematic review of the association between factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene variant and intrauterine growth restriction

2005 ◽  
Vol 192 (3) ◽  
pp. 694-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather E.A. Howley ◽  
Mark Walker ◽  
Marc A. Rodger
2003 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietmar SCHLEMBACH ◽  
Ernst BEINDER ◽  
Juergen ZINGSEM ◽  
Ute WUNSIEDLER ◽  
Matthias W. BECKMANN ◽  
...  

This study was conducted to investigate the association of maternal and/or fetal factor V Leiden (FVL) and G20210A prothrombin mutation with HELLP syndrome. FVL and G20210A prothrombin mutation were determined using PCR. Sixty-three pregnant women, 36 of them diagnosed with HELLP syndrome, were included in the study. Overall, 68 children were born as a result of these pregnancies and blood sampling was possible in 28 out of 39 children from HELLP patients and 25 out of 29 children from the control women. The prevalence of a maternal FVL was elevated 2-fold in HELLP patients compared with the control women [six out of 36 (16.7%) compared with two out of 27 (7.4%); P=0.282]. None of the HELLP patients and only one woman in the control group was found to be positive for the G20210A prothrombin mutation (P=0.251). The fetal carrier frequency was four out of 28 compared with three out of 25 for FVL (P=0.811), and two out of 28 compared with one out of 25 for G20210A prothrombin mutation (P=0.629). Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was significantly higher in fetuses found to be positive for a thrombophilic mutation (P=0.022). IUGR occurred in seven out of ten fetuses with a thrombophilic mutation compared with 11 out of 43 in fetuses without a mutation. The prevalence of FVL, but not of the G20210A prothrombin mutation, seems to be elevated in women with HELLP syndrome. A fetal thrombophilic mutation does not contribute significantly to the clinical features of the HELLP syndrome. Our results demonstrate a fetal contribution to IUGR. Fetal thrombophilic mutations may lead to placental microthrombosis, which consecutively could lead to a disturbed fetoplacental blood flow and thus cause growth restriction.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1142-1142
Author(s):  
Sarah Louise Dunbar Takach Lapner ◽  
Gregoire Le Gal ◽  
Genevieve Le Templier ◽  
Mark Walker ◽  
Graeme N Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1142 Background Pregnancy is associated with a hypercoagulable state, with the highest risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurring during the postpartum period. This risk is further increased by the presence of inherited thrombophilic states, including Factor V Leiden (FVL) or the prothrombin gene variant (PGV), such that many clinicians provide routine postpartum thromboprophylaxis for this group. Publications examining the absolute incidence of pregnancy associated VTE in carriers of FVL and PGV report a rate of only 0–1% over the combined antepartum and 6–12 week postpartum periods. However, given that at least 50% of pregnancy associated VTE occur postpartum, the daily risk of VTE may be sufficiently high to warrant thromboprophylaxis during this period. Objectives Methods We performed a substudy analysis of the prospective Ottawa and Kingston (OaK) birth cohort study, in which women presenting for routine antenatal care were followed throughout pregnancy until delivery. Genotyping for FVL and PGV by polymerase chain reaction was performed for all participants after completion of the postpartum period. 336 women who enrolled through the participating Ottawa hospitals and identified as FVL or PGV positive were eligible for the current analysis. Data relating to the occurrence of VTE during the 6-week post partum period were obtained for 201/336 women through medical record review or direct contact by a study investigator. The main outcome measure was the proportion of objectively confirmed VTE within 6 weeks of delivery among participants with heterozygous FVL or PGV. Eligible articles were identified through a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database. Inclusion criteria included a) prospective cohort design of women completing pregnancy during the study period; b) assessment of all participants for FVL and/or PGV; c) observation of participants throughout the postpartum period; d) report of objectively confirmed VTE during the postpartum period. Studies limited to women with previous pregnancy complications or previous VTE were excluded. The pooled proportion of postpartum VTE was calculated from combination of reported postpartum VTE rates and the current study results. Results No postpartum VTE occurred among the 188 participants heterozygous for FVL or PGV alone. The proportion of VTE among the population with isolated heterozygous FVL and/or PGV was 0% (95% CI 0 to 2.0). One postpartum event was documented in a heterozygous PGV carrier with coexisting protein C deficiency. No events were documented among 12 women with homozygous or compound heterozygous defects. Superficial vein thrombosis was diagnosed in two carriers of FVL. Ten publications examining the rate of postpartum VTE among FVL or PGV carriers were identified in the systematic review. (Table 1) The pooled proportion of postpartum VTE among those who did not receive postpartum prophylaxis was 0.6% (95% CI 0.2 to 1.3) for heterozygous carriers of FVL and 0% (95% CI 0 to 1.6) for PGV heterozygotes. Conclusion The absolute risk of VTE among asymptomatic carriers of FVL or PGV appears sufficiently low to withhold postpartum prophylaxis. Disclosures: Ramsay: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada: Research Funding; Canadian Institutes of Health Research: Research Funding. Rodger:Canadian Institutes of Health Research: Research Funding; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada: Research Funding.


Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 745
Author(s):  
María José Benítez-Marín ◽  
Jesús Marín-Clavijo ◽  
Juan Antonio Blanco-Elena ◽  
Jesús Jiménez-López ◽  
Ernesto González-Mesa

Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a pregnancy complication. Multiple studies have connected FGR to poor cognitive development, behavior disorders, and academic difficulties during childhood. Brain sparing has traditionally been defined as an adaptive phenomenon in which the brain obtains the blood flow that it needs. However, this adaptive phenomenon might not have a complete protective effect. This publication aims to systematically review the consequences of brain redistribution on neurodevelopment in children who presented with placental intrauterine growth restriction. Methods: We performed a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. It included studies on intrauterine growth restriction or small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses, which middle cerebral artery was measured, and neurodevelopment assessed during childhood. PUBMED and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant published studies. Results: Of the 526 studies reviewed, only 12 were included. Brain sparing was associated with poor cognitive function and lower scores in IQ. Cerebral redistribution was related to better executive function and better behavior at 4 years old but not at 12 years old. Conclusions: We can assume that fetal brain sparing could not be a fully protective phenomenon. We could not find clinical differences in behavioral and executive functions because the results were heterogeneous. Some cognitive abilities could be affected in FGR brain sparing fetuses.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2318-2318
Author(s):  
Junghyun Park ◽  
Marc Rodger

Introduction Thrombophilia testing in unprovoked venous thromboembolism patients (VTE) is controversial. Common thrombophilias such as Factor V Leiden or prothrombin gene variant appear to not importantly increase the risk of VTE recurrence, and thus are not considered in anticoagulation management decisions. However, patients with potent thrombophilias such as antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA), antithrombin deficiency, protein C and S deficiency, and homozygous genetic thrombophilias or combined defects are at higher risk of recurrence and it is recommended that they receive long-term anticoagulation. If the proportion of patients with "potent" thrombophilia is high then thrombophilia testing should be conducted. We sought to determine the proportion of unprovoked VTE patients with "potent" thrombophilia. Methods All patients with managed in our oral anticoagulation management system in the period from 1998 to 2015 were potentially eligible for the study. Inclusion criteria were: 1) symptomatic, objectively confirmed VTE unprovoked proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Exclusion criteria were: 1) cancer or myeloproliferative disease at the time of VTE diagnosis; 2) no cast, surgery, trauma or immobilization (>3 days in bed 90% of waking hours) in the 90 days prior to diagnosis. We selected unprovoked VTE patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2010, as thrombophilia testing was relatively universal and available in our electronic system in that time frame (N=1344). We then selected a convenience sample of N=1165. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with "potent" thrombophilia (potent= homozygous Factor V Leiden, homozygous Prothrombin gene variant, APLA, protein C, protein S or anti-thrombin deficiency or combined deficiencies). Results In 1165 patients with unprovoked VTE, complete screening was done in 470 patients (40.34%) and 976 (83.78%) had at least one thrombophilia test. Complete thrombophilia testing was defined as a screen including testing for factor V Leiden, prothrombin gene defect, APLA, anti-thrombin deficiency, protein C, and protein S. Potent thrombophilias were demonstrated in 103/1165 patients (8.84%; 95% CI, 7.34 to 10.61) (Table 2) in the total study population, and 103/976 (10.55%; 95% CI, 9.62-14.47) in patients with at least one thrombophilia test. Conclusion The proportion of unprovoked VTE patients with "potent" thrombophilia is high. Given a high proportion of "potent' thrombophilia patients who likely benefit from indefinite anticoagulation, complete thrombophilia testing appears warranted in patients with unprovoked VTE in whom anticoagulants maybe discontinued. Thrombophilia testing is warranted for a selected group of patients to detect high-risk thrombophilias that could impact anticoagulation management. Table 1. Thrombophilia screening Complete screening 470 (40.3%) No screening 189 (16.2%) At least one thrombophilia test 976 (83.8%) Table 2. Thrombophilia All patients (n=1165) Tested for individual thrombophilia % 95% CI % 95% CI FVL Heterozygous 162/1165 (13.9%) 12.0-16.0% 162/883 (18.4%) 15.9-21.0% FVL Homozygous 4/1165 (0.3%) 0.1-0.9% 4/883 (0.5%) 0.2-1.2% Prothrombin Heterozygous 63/1165 (5.4%) 4.3-6.9% 63/831 (7.6%) 6.0-9.6% Prothrombin Homozygous 1/1165 (0.0%) 0.0-0.5% 1/831 (0.1%) 0.0-0.7% Antithrombin deficiency 10/1165 (0.9%) 0.5-1.6% 10/815 (1.2%) 0.7-2.2% Protein C deficiency 18/1165 (1.6%) 1.0-2.4% 18/639 (2.8%) 1.8-4.4% Protein S deficiency 13/1165 (1.1%) 0.7-1.9% 13/635 (2.1%) 1.2-3.5% Lupus anticoagulant 24/1165 (2.1%) 1.4-3.1% 24/849 (2.8%) 1.9-4.2% Anticardiolipin IgM 16/1165 (1.4%) 0.9-2.2% 16/886 (1.8%) 1.1-2.9% Anticardiolipin IgG 20/1165 (1.7%) 1.1-2.6% 20/885 (2.2%) 1.5-3.5% β-2 microglobulin IgM 10/1165 (0.9%) 0.5-1.6% 10/333 (3.0%) 1.6-5.4% β-2 microglobulin IgG 8/1165 (0.7%) 0.4-1.4% 8/333 (2.4%) 1.2-4.7% Homocysteine 50/1165 (5.7%) 4.3-7.4% 50/668 (7.5%) 5.7-9.7% Factor VIII elevated 11/1165 (0.9%) 0.5-1.7% 11/646 (1.7%) 1.0-3.0% At least one or more of the above 331/1165 (28.4%) 25.9-31.1% 331/976 (33.9%) 31.0-36.9% Potent thrombophilia 103/1165 (8.8%) 7.34-10.6% 103/976 (10.6%) 9.6-14.5% Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document