The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus

2018 ◽  
Vol 219 (5) ◽  
pp. 490.e1-490.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Emi Bretschneider ◽  
Pamela Frazzini Padilla ◽  
Deepanjana Das ◽  
J. Eric Jelovsek ◽  
Cecile A. Unger
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. BECB.S10967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette McCrory ◽  
Chad A. LaGrange ◽  
M.S. Hallbeck

Adverse events because of medical errors are a leading cause of death in the United States (US) exceeding the mortality rates of motor vehicle accidents, breast cancer, and AIDS. Improvements can and should be made to reduce the rates of preventable surgical errors because they account for nearly half of all adverse events within hospitals. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has proven patient benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and hospital stay, its operative environment imposes substantial physical and cognitive strain on the surgeon increasing the risk of error. To mitigate errors and protect patients, a multidisciplinary approach is needed to improve MIS. Clinical human factors, and biomedical engineering principles and methodologies can be used to develop and assess laparoscopic surgery instrumentation, practices, and procedures. First, the foundational understanding and the imperative to transform health care into a high-quality and safe system is discussed. Next, a generalized perspective is presented on the impact of the design and redesign of surgical technologies and processes on human performance. Finally, the future of this field and the research needed to further improve the quality and safety of MIS is discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18109-e18109
Author(s):  
Amy Dawn Gee ◽  
Shannon Michelle Grabosch ◽  
Jeffrey Gavard

e18109 Background: The overdose death rate related to opiates has quadrupled in the last two decades. Up to 27% of chronic opiate users report initiation in the post-op period. Among cancer patients, 10% of opioid-naive patients continue chronic use one year after surgery. Restrictive opiate prescribing has demonstrated promise in other studies. However, lacking from current literature is an analysis of the effect that same day discharge (SDD) has on post-op opiate usage at home. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of SDD versus physician-elected observation for 1 to 2 days on acute post-op opiate usage and safety following minimally-invasive hysterectomy (MIH). Methods: This is a prospective observational study of women undergoing MIH. Sixty patients were assigned to either the SDD or hospitalization group at provider discretion based on practice pattern, distance from hospital, or comorbidities. One patient was lost to follow up. Patients were followed through 30 days after surgery. Total opiate usage included the inpatient usage (if hospitalized) and home usage assessed at the post-op visit. Anonymous surveys were used to collect home opiate usage practices, satisfaction, and self-reported risk factors for continued use. Continuous variables were analyzed by independent Student’s t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test. Results: 29 SDD and 30 hospitalized patients were available for review. Demographics including age, BMI, tobacco use, and procedure indication were well matched. SDD patients used a median 5.0 (1.5-13.5) versus 8.5 (2.25-14.25) 5mg oxycodone tabs (p 0.33). SDD patients used opiates less for non-pain indications including to sleep (4 vs 9, p 0.24) or relax (3 vs 5, p 0.71). One SDD patient had a complication of a cuff hematoma, which spontaneously drained. There were no readmissions. Only one SDD patient felt she would have benefited from longer stay due to nausea. All hospitalized patients took their own opiates at home while 7 SDD had a family member dispense. Psychiatric disorders were the highest comorbidities in both groups (depression n = 12 and 10, anxiety n = 10 and 12). Conclusions: SDD demonstrated a trend towards less opiate usage, although not statistically significant. Patients did not feel that they needed to stay longer in the hospital. The safety of SDD is supported by lack of readmissions and one minor post-op complication. The high rates of psychiatric disease are a concerning risk factor for chronic use.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Park ◽  
Cheerag Upadhyaya ◽  
Hugh J.L. Garton ◽  
Kevin T. Foley

Abstract OBJECTIVE Open lumbar spinal surgery in overweight or obese patients has been associated with increased risk of perioperative complications. The impact of minimally invasive spinal (MIS) surgery on the incidence of perioperative adverse events in overweight or obese patients, however, has not been well evaluated. METHODS A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing lumbar MIS surgery from January 2006 to April 2007 was performed. Of the 77 patients identified, 56 had a body mass index (BMI) of 25.0 kg/m2 or greater. RESULTS Of the 56 patients with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or greater, 32 (57.1%) were men; the mean age was 54.1 years. The mean BMI was 31.0 kg/m2 (range, 25.1–43.8 kg/m2). Using a broad definition of an adverse event, eight (14.3%) complications were identified. In the discectomy/laminotomy subgroup (31 patients), two (6.5%) adverse events were noted. In the fusion subgroup (25 patients), six (24%) adverse events were noted, most of which were minor. Of the 21 patients with a BMI less than 25 kg/m2, eight (38.1%) were men, and the mean age was 43.7 years. The mean BMI was 22.5 kg/m2 (range, 16.8–24.6 kg/m2). Three (14.3%) complications were noted overall. In the discectomy/laminotomy subgroup (17 patients), two (11.8%) adverse events occurred. One (25%) complication developed in the four patients making up the fusion subgroup. There was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between groups. Logistic regression also found no statistically significant relationship between BMI and perioperative complications. CONCLUSION There does not appear to be an increased risk of developing perioperative complications in overweight or obese patients undergoing MIS surgery, which may reflect a potential benefit of the MIS approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document