Comparison of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Risk Score Versus the Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse outcomes With Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines Risk Score to Predict In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding in Acute Coronary Syndromes

2016 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 1047-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Manzano-Fernández ◽  
Marianela Sánchez-Martínez ◽  
Pedro J. Flores-Blanco ◽  
Ángel López-Cuenca ◽  
Miriam Gómez-Molina ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-187
Author(s):  
Marianela Sánchez-Martínez ◽  
Pedro J. Flores-Blanco ◽  
Ángel A. López-Cuenca ◽  
María J. Sánchez-Galián ◽  
Miriam Gómez-Molina ◽  
...  

Background: Kidney dysfunction (KD) has been associated with increased risk for major bleeding (MB) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and may be in part related to an underuse of evidence-based therapies. Our aim was to assess the predictive ability of the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines (CRUSADE) risk score in patients with concomitant ACS and chronic kidney disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry including 1,587 ACS patients. In-hospital MB was prospectively recorded according to the CRUSADE and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. KD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Results: The predictive ability of the CRUSADE risk score was assessed by discrimination and calibration analyses. A total of 465 (29%) subjects had KD. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, we found high CRUSADE risk score values to be associated with a higher rate of in-hospital MB; however, among patients with KD, it was not associated with BARC MB. Regardless of the MB definition, the predictive ability of the CRUSADE score in patients with KD was lower: area under the curve (AUC) 0.71 versus 0.79, p = 0.03 for CRUSADE MB and AUC 0.65 versus 0.75, p = 0.02 for BARC MB. Hosmer-Lemeshow analyses showed a good calibration in all renal function subgroups for both MB definitions (all p values >0.3). Conclusions: The CRUSADE risk score shows a lower accuracy for predicting in-hospital MB in KD patients compared to those without KD.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara S Gonçalves ◽  
Pedro Amador ◽  
Lígia Mendes ◽  
Filipe Seixo ◽  
José F Santos

The TIMI Risk Score is a simple and effective tool for risk stratification in patients (pts) with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). The presence of heart failure (HF) or a low ejection fraction (EF) has also been associated with a worse outcome. We sought to evaluate the interaction of heart failure on the risk gradient defined by the TIMI Risk Score in a NSTE-ACS population. We studied 9980 pts with NSTE-ACS included in a prospective nationwide clinical registry since 2002. Pts were stratified by TIMI Risk Score in low (0 to 2), intermediate (3 and 4) and high risk (5 to 7) groups. The population was divided in two groups according to the presence or absence of HF. HF was defined as the presence of a Killip class >1 or a systolic EF <30%. In-hospital mortality or re-infarction was assessed in both groups during the index hospitalization and according to TIMI Risk Score Stratification. Results: In-hospital mortality or re-infarction was 1,9% in low risk, 3,7% in intermediate and 6,3% in high risk pts (Qui-square trend p<0,001). The risk gradient defined by the TIMI risk score was not observed in patients without HF (Qui-Square for trend=ns). In pts with HF, the TIMI risk score maintains its predictor value (Qui-square trend=0,014), but the presence of HF identifies a higher risk subgroup. In this population, HF was a strong independent predictor for in-hospital mortality and re-infarction (OR 10,01). In NSTE-ACS pts, the presence of HF identifies the patients with higher risk for in-hospital risk and re-infarction within each TIMI Risk Score subgroup. There was no risk gradient assessed by the TIMI risk score in the absence of HF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document