scholarly journals 1188TiP NICE-NEC, a phase II study of platinum-doublet chemotherapy in combination with nivolumab as first-line treatment in subjects with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the gastroenteropancreatic tract or of unknown origin. GETNE-T1913

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S783
Author(s):  
M.C. Riesco Martínez ◽  
J. Capdevila ◽  
V. Alonso ◽  
A. Teule ◽  
E. Grande ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA2-LBA2
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Hai-Qiang Mai ◽  
Qiu-Yan Chen ◽  
Dongping Chen ◽  
Chaosu Hu ◽  
...  

LBA2 Background: Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy is the standard 1st line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic (r/m) NPC. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, provided durable responses in patients (pts) with r/m NPC as monotherapy in the ≥2nd line setting (POLARIS-02 study). The results of JUPITER-02, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase III trial of toripalimab in combination with GP chemotherapy as first-line treatment for r/m NPC are summarized. Methods: Pts with advanced NPC with no prior chemotherapy in the r/m setting were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab 240 mg or placebo d1 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1, d8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 6 cycles, followed by monotherapy with toripalimab or placebo Q3W until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors were ECOG PS (0 vs. 1) and extent of disease (recurrent vs. primary metastatic) at enrollment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and response were assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC in the ITT population. Secondary end points included ORR, DOR and OS. There was one prespecified interim analysis of PFS at 130 PFS events with a planned final analysis at 200 PFS events. Results: 289 pts were randomized: 146 to the toripalimab arm and 143 to the placebo arm. By May 30, 2020 as the interim analysis cutoff date, the median treatment duration was 39 weeks in the toripalimab arm and 36 weeks in the placebo arm. A significant improvement in PFS was detected for the toripalimab arm compared to the placebo arm (HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.36-0.74] two-sided p = 0.0003), with median PFS of 11.7 vs. 8.0 months. The 1-year PFS rates were 49% and 28% respectively. An improvement in PFS was observed across relevant subgroups, including all PD-L1 subgroups. The ORR was 77.4% vs. 66.4% (P = 0.033) and the median DOR was 10.0 vs. 5.7 months (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.33-0.78]). As of Jan 15, 2021, OS was not mature, with 25 deaths in the toripalimab arm and 35 in the placebo arm (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.41-1.14], P = 0.14). The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (89.0% vs 89.5%); AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (7.5% vs 4.9%); and fatal AEs (2.7% vs 2.8%) were similar between two arms; however, immune-related (irAEs) (39.7% vs. 18.9%) and Grade ≥3 irAEs (7.5% vs. 0.7%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to GP chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for pts with advanced NPC provided superior PFS and ORR and longer DOR than GP alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with GP chemotherapy as the new standard care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03581786.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17112-17112
Author(s):  
D. Binder ◽  
M. Hackenthal ◽  
L. Graseck ◽  
H. Schweisfurth ◽  
C. Schäper ◽  
...  

17112 Background: Recent trials have shown that the combination docetaxel-cisplatin is an effective first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. However, the regimen can be associated with a marked rate of neutropenia. The present study tests the efficacy and tolerability of a weekly schedule of docetaxel and cisplatin. Methods: Patients (pts) with histologically confirmed NSCLC stages UICC IIIB (malignant effusion) or IV were treated with docetaxel (35 mg/m2, 30 min. infusion) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2, 30 min. infusion) on days 1, 8 and 15 repeated every 4 weeks for 4 to 6 cycles. This phase II study is scheduled to include 50 pts and primary endpoint is tumour response rate. Pts received 8 mg of ondansetron and 8 mg of dexamethasone i.v. preceding every day of therapy and oral dexamethasone 2 × 4 mg from the day before until the day after chemotherapy. NK1-antagonists were given at discretion of the investigator. In total, 2750 ml of volume were infused on each day of therapy. Most of the pts were treated in an outpatient department. Safety was assessed via common terminology criteria for adverse events v3.0 (CTCAE 3.0). Interim tolerability data is presented. Results: Currently, 28 pts were evaluable for this interim tolerability analysis. Pts received a median of 3 full cycles. There were no treatment-related deaths. Dose reductions of docetaxel and cisplatin due to poor tolerability were necessary in 3 pts (11%). No pts suffered from neutropenic fever while grade 3 neutropenia occurred in only 2 pts (7%). There was no grade 2/3/4 thrombocytopenia. 5 pts (18%) had grade 2 anemia, and 2 pts (7%) had an elevation of the plasma creatinine (both grade 1). Other toxicities were non-neutropenic infections (5/1/1 pts with grade 2, 3, 4, respectively), diarrhea (3 pts [11%] with grade 3), constipation (5 pts [18%] with grade 2) and mucositis (4 pts [14%] with grade 2/3). There was no grade 3/4 nausea or vomiting; 3 pts [11%] had grade 2 nausea/vomiting. Conclusions: In the present study, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin appears well tolerated. It was associated with a very low frequency of severe hematologic toxicity or neutropenic fever. With relatively low hydration volumes it can be safely administered in an outpatient setting. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7081-7081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary O'Brien ◽  
Rabab Mohamed Gaafar ◽  
Sanjaykumar Popat ◽  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Allan Price ◽  
...  

7081 Background: Cisplatin is one of the most active drugs available in MPM while bortezomib has shown some activity in single agent phase II studies against MPM. This was a prospective phase II study of cisplatin and bortezomib (CB) in the first line treatment of MPM. Methods: Patients with histological proven MPM, with performance status (PS) 0/1, were eligible. The doses were cisplatin 75mg/m2 /3 wks and bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, 11 every 3 wks. The primary end-point was progression free survival rate at 18 wks (PFSR=18). The 2-stage Simon design (a=0.1; b = 0.05, P0=0.50 and P1=0.675) was used. In the first step of the study 37 eligible patients were planned. If more than 19 patients were alive and free of progression at 18 wks the total sample size was increased to 76 eligible patients. Results: Between 2007 and 2010 82 patients were entered. The median follow-up time is 32.3 months The median age was 55 years (range: 22-77yrs), male/female: 55/27 , PS 0/1: 9/73, Stage T1: 10%; T2: 42%, T3: 25%; T4: 23% and N0: 57%; N1: 4%; N2: 33%; N3: 6%. The median number of cycles received was 4 and 38% received 6 cycles. Cisplatin/ bortezomib dose intensity was 98/ 80%. Toxicity (grade 3/4): neutropenia 10%, thrombocytopenia 11%, anaemia 1%. Grade 3-4 hyponatraemia/ hypokalaemia occurred in 46/ and 17%. Grade 2 tinnitus, grade 3 fatigue occurred in 16%, and 12%, of patients. Motor/sensory/other neurotoxicity was grade 1: 6/28/7%, grade 2: 2/26/2% and grade 3: 1/7/2% respectively. There were 2 toxic deaths at 32 and 74 days due to acute pneumonitis and cardiac arrest. The PFRS-18 (including symptomatic progression) was 53% (80% confidence intervals, CI, 42-64%). The overall survival was 13.5 months (95% CI 10.5-15) with 56% (95% CI 44-66%) alive at 1 year. The PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.3-6.5). Conclusions: On the basis of the PFRS-18, the null hypothesis could not be rejected, although CB gave predictable toxicity and was as active as other reported regimens in MPM.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14604-e14604
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jing Gao ◽  
Xicheng Wang ◽  
...  

e14604 Background: Nimotuzumab is a genetically engineered humanized antibody (mAb) that recognizes an epitope located in the extracellular domain of human EGFR. Evidences have shown that nimotuzumab is effective and safe in SCCHN. The combination of paclitaxel/cisplatin (TP) is a standard regimen for advanced or metastatic ESCC. This open uncontrolled phase II study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab in combination with TP as the first-line treatment in advanced ESCC. Methods: All patients have histology/cytology confirmed advanced or metastatic ESCC with ECOG PS 0-2. The treatment plan is as the following: paclitaxel administered intravenously (IV) 175 mg/m2 on d1 and cisplatin IV 30-35mg/ m2/d on d1-2, every 21 days for 6 cycles, and nimotuzumab IV 200mg weekly. For patients with stable disease (SD) and better, nimotuzumab will be given continuously after 6 cycles of TP. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (RR) with 56 patients enrollment (target RR >60%); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety/ tolerability. The coordinations between EGFR and ERCC1 with response of treatment will be analyzed. Results: Up to date, 25 patients (male/female, 20/5; median age 58) have been enrolled. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 22 are evaluable for response. 14 (63.6%) had a confirmed partial response (PR) and 7 (31.8%) had SD as their best responses with disease control rate of 95.4%. Only one patient had progressive disease (PD). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever and anemia occurred in 52.2%, 4% and 13% respectively. Nonhematological toxicities were generally mild with grade 1 or 2 alopecie, hypodynamia, anorexia, nausea, arthralgia, and itch of skin occurring in 80%, 60.9%, 43.5%, 34.8%, 30.4%, and 21.7%. One patient had a grade 3 haematuria. Conclusions: The interim analysis showed that the combination of nimotuzumab with TP is tolerated reasonably well in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC and encouraging efficacy. The study is ongoing with coordination of biomarkers and response as well.


2003 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. S56 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Lorvidhaya ◽  
P. Phromratanapongs ◽  
I. Chitapanarux ◽  
P. Kamnerdsupaphon ◽  
P. Lertsanguansinchai ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mesmoudi ◽  
Tarik Mahfoud ◽  
Samir Ahid ◽  
Nabil Ismaili ◽  
Saber Boutayeb ◽  
...  

Background: The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy and toxicity of a non-platinum based chemotherapy combination using irinotecan associated to bolus 5-FU as first line treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Materiel and methods: Retrospective analysis of a population of patients treated for metastatic and locally advanced gastric cancer with irinotecan and 5-FU as upfront chemotherapy. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years. Seven patients were males and six were of females. Ten patients had a metastatic disease and three patients had a locally advanced disease. Patients received a total number of 43 cycles of chemotherapy. Overall response rate was 38,4%, median time to progression (TTP) was 3 months, and median overall survival was 4 months. Three patients (23,1%) presented grade 3 /4 neutropenia complicated with an infectious episode with fever in two cases, three patients (23,1%) required blood transfusion for a grade 4 anemia, and one patient (7,6%) was hospitalized for a severe episode of diarrhea. Conclusion: Three weekly irinotecan and bolus 5-FU is an interesting combination as first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer; designed clinical trials are needed to confirm the activity of this combination.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. iv34-iv35
Author(s):  
Nicoline Raaschou-Jensen ◽  
Kell Oesterlind ◽  
Mette Yilmaz ◽  
Jens Bentzen ◽  
Lars Damstrup ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document