scholarly journals New reactor cavity cooling system having passive safety features using novel shape for HTGRs and VHTRs

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuniyoshi Takamatsu ◽  
Rui Hu
Keyword(s):  
Cooling System ◽  
Passive Safety ◽  
Safety Features ◽  
Cavity Cooling

AP1000 Passive Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Confirmatory Analysis

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard F. Wright ◽  
James R. Schwall ◽  
Creed Taylor ◽  
Naeem U. Karim ◽  
Jivan G. Thakkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Heat Removal ◽  
Passive Safety ◽  
Tube Heat Exchanger ◽  
Removal Capacity ◽  
Safety Margins ◽  
Final Design ◽  
Safety Features ◽  
Residual Heat

The AP1000 is an 1100 MWe advanced nuclear power plant that uses passive safety features to enhance plant safety and to provide significant and measurable improvements in plant simplification, reliability, investment protection and plant costs. The AP1000 received final design approval from the US-NRC in 2004. The AP1000 design is based on the AP600 design that received final design approval in 1999. Wherever possible, the AP1000 plant configuration and layout was kept the same as AP600 to take advantage of the maturity of the design and to minimize new design efforts. As a result, the two-loop configuration was maintained for AP1000, and the containment vessel diameter was kept the same. It was determined that this significant power uprate was well within the capability of the passive safety features, and that the safety margins for AP1000 were greater than those of operating PWRs. A key feature of the passive core cooling system is the passive residual heat removal heat exchanger (PRHR HX) that provides decay heat removal for postulated LOCA and non-LOCA events. The PRHR HX is a C-tube heat exchanger located in the in-containment refueling water storage tank (IRWST) above the core promoting natural circulation heat removal between the reactor cooling system and the tank. Component testing was performed for the AP600 PRHR HX to determine the heat transfer characteristics and to develop correlations to be used for the AP1000 safety analysis codes. The data from these tests were confirmed by subsequent integral tests at three separate facilities including the ROSA facility in Japan. Owing to the importance of this component, an independent analysis has been performed using the ATHOS-based computational fluid dynamics computer code PRHRCFD. Two separate models of the PRHR HX and IRWST have been developed representing the ROSA test geometry and the AP1000 plant geometry. Confirmation of the ROSA test results were used to validate PRHRCFD, and the AP1000 plant model was used to confirm the heat removal capacity for the full-sized heat exchanger. The results of these simulations show that the heat removal capacity of the PRHR HX is conservatively represented in the AP1000 safety analyses.

scholarly journals REACTOR CAVITY COOLING SYSTEM WITH PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURES ON RDE: THERMAL ANALYSIS DURING ACCIDENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Rahayu Kusumastuti ◽  
Sriyono Sriyono ◽  
Mulya Juarsa ◽  
Hendro Tjahjono ◽  
I. D. Irianto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Natural Convection ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Power Level ◽  
Heat Removal ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Normal Operation ◽  
Passive Safety ◽  
Diesel Generator ◽  
Cavity Cooling

Reaktor Daya Eksperimental (RDE) is an experimental power reactor based on HTGR technology that implements inherent safety system. Its safety systems are in compliance with “defense in depth” philosophy. RDE is also equipped with reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) used to remove the heat transferred from the reactor vessel to the containment structure. The RCCS is designed to fulfil this role by maintain the reactor vessel under the maximum allowable temperature during normal operation and protecting the containment structure in the event of failure of all passive cooling systems. The performance and reliability of the RCCS, therefore, are considered as critical factors in determining maximum design power level related to heat removal. RCCS for RDE will use a novel shape to efficiently remove the heat released from the RPV through thermal radiation and natural convection. This paper discusses the calculation of RCCS thermal analysis during accident. The RPV temperature must be maintained below 65ºC. The accident is assumed that there is no electricity from diesel generator supplied to the blower. The methodology used is based on the calculation of mathematical model of the RCCS in the passive mode. The heat is released through cavity by natural convection, in which the RCCS is capable to withdraw the heat at the rate of 50.54 kW per hour.Keywords: Passive safety, RCCS, RDE, Thermal analysis

Post Small-Break LOCA Long Term Core Cooling Performance in ACME Test Facility

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhanfei Qi ◽  
Sheng Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Safety Margin ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Passive Safety ◽  
Pressurized Water Reactor ◽  
Pressurized Water ◽  
Safety Features ◽  
Core Cooling

CAP1400 Pressurized Water Reactor is developed by China’s State Nuclear Power Technology Corporation (SNPTC) based on the passive safety concept and advanced system design. The Advanced Core-cooling Mechanism Experiment (ACME) integral effect test facility, which was constructed at Tsinghua University, represents a 1/3-scale height of CAP1400 RCS and passive safety features. It is designed to simulate the performance of CAP1400 passive core cooling system in the small break loss of coolant accidents (SBLOCA) for design certification, safety review and safety analysis code development. The Long Term Core Cooling (LTCC) post-LOCA could be simulated by ACME as well. A series of test cases with various break sizes and locations with post-LOCA LTCC period were conducted in ACME facility. This paper describes the post-LOCA LTCC test conducted in ACME test facility. The LTCC phenomena in different cases are very similar. It’s found that the interval that switching from IRWST injection to sump recirculation has the least safety margin. However, it’s shown that the post-LOCA LTCC in ACME could be well maintained by passive core cooling system according to the test results even though the recirculation water level in ACME IRWST-2 is lower than the containment recircualtion level in CAP1400 conservatively.

Passive Safety Features in Sodium Cooled Super-Safe, Small and Simple Reactor

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Ueda ◽  
I. Kinoshita ◽  
Y. Nishi ◽  
A. Minato ◽  
H. Matsumiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cooling System ◽  
Heat Removal ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Passive Safety ◽  
Primary Coolant ◽  
Decay Heat ◽  
The Core ◽  
Design Requirements ◽  
Safety Features ◽  
Dynamics Analyses

This paper describes the passive safety features utilized in the updated sodium cooled Super-Safe, Small and Simple fast reactor, which is the improved 4S reactor. This reactor can operate up to ten years without refueling and neutron reflector regulates the reactivity. One of the design requirements is to secure the core against all anticipated transients without reactor scram. Therefore, the reactor concept is to design to enhance the passive safety features. All temperature reactivity feedback coefficients including whole core sodium void worth are negative. Also, introducing of RVACS (Reactor Vessel Auxiliary Cooling System) can enhance the passive decay heat removal capability. Safety analyses are carried out to simulate various transient sequences, which are loss of flow events, transient overpower events and loss of heat sink events, in order to evaluate the passive safety capabilities. A calculation tool for plant dynamics analyses for fast reactors has been modified to model the 4S including the unique plant system, which are reflector control system, circulation pumps and RVACS. The analytical results predict that the designed passive features improve the safety in which temperature variation in transients are satisfied with the safety criteria for the fuel element and the structure of the primary coolant boundary.

iB1350: A Generation III.7 Reactor After the Fukushima Daiichi Accident

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sato ◽  
Keiji Matsumoto ◽  
Kenji Hosomi ◽  
Keisuke Taguchi
Keyword(s):  
Cooling System ◽  
Boiling Water ◽  
Passive Safety ◽  
Active Safety ◽  
Water Reactor ◽  
Airplane Crash ◽  
Passive Safety Systems ◽  
Active Safety Systems ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi ◽  
Safety Systems

iB1350 stands for an innovative, intelligent and inexpensive boiling water reactor 1350. It is the first Generation III.7 reactor after the Fukushima Daiichi accident. It has incorporated lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi accident and Western European Nuclear Regulation Association safety objectives. It has innovative safety to cope with devastating natural disasters including a giant earthquake, a large tsunami and a monster hurricane. The iB1350 can survive passively such devastation and a very prolonged station blackout without any support from the outside of a site up to 7 days even preventing core melt. It, however, is based on the well-established proven Advance Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) design. The nuclear steam supply system is exactly the same as that of the current ABWR. As for safety design it has a double cylinder reinforced concrete containment vessel (Mark W containment) and an in-depth hybrid safety system (IDHS). The Mark W containment has double fission product confinement barriers and the in-containment filtered venting system (IFVS) that enable passively no emergency evacuation outside the immediate vicinity of the plant for a severe accident (SA). It has a large volume to hold hydrogen, a core catcher, a passive flooding system and an innovative passive containment cooling system (iPCCS) establishing passively practical elimination of containment failure even in a long term. The IDHS consists of 4 division active safety systems for a design basis accident, 2 division active safety systems for a SA and built-in passive safety systems (BiPSS) consisting of an isolation condenser (IC) and the iPCCS for a SA. The IC/PCCS pools have enough capacity for 7-day grace period. The IC/PCCS heat exchangers, core and spent fuel pool are enclosed inside the containment vessel (CV) building and protected against a large airplane crash. The iB1350 can survive a large airplane crash only by the CV building and the built-in passive safety systems therein. The dome of the CV building consists of a single wall made of steel and concrete composite. This single dome structure facilitates a short-term construction period and cost saving. The CV diameter is smaller than that of most PWR resulting in a smaller R/B. Each active safety division includes only one emergency core cooling system (ECCS) pump and one emergency diesel generator (EDG). Therefore, a single failure of the EDG never causes multiple failures of ECCS pumps in a safety division. The iB1350 is based on the proven ABWR technology and ready for construction. No new technology is incorporated but design concept and philosophy are initiative and innovative.

Study on the Heat Transfer in the Water Pool Type Reactor Cavity Cooling System of the Very High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. K. Cho ◽  
D. U. Seo ◽  
M. O. Kim ◽  
G. C. Park
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Forced Convection ◽  
Cooling System ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Water Pool ◽  
Cooling Pipe ◽  
Cavity Cooling ◽  
The Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Pool Type ◽  
High Temperature Gas

In the HTGR (High Temperature Gas Cooled Reactor), the Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS) is equipped to remove the heat transferred from the reactor vessel to the structure of the containment. The function of the RCCS is to dissipate the heat from the reactor cavity during normal operation including shutdown. The system also removes the decay heat during the loss of forced convection (LOFC) accident. A new concept of the water pool type RCCS was proposed at Seoul National University. The system mainly consists of two parts, water pool located between the containment and reactor vessel and five trains of air cooling system installed in the water pool. In normal operations, the heat loss from the reactor vessel is transferred into the water pool via cavity and it is removed by the forced convection of air flowing through the cooling pipes. During the LOFC accident, the after heat is passively removed by the water tank without the forced convection of air and the RCCS water pool is designed to provide sufficient passive cooling capacity of the after heat removal for three days. In the present study, experiments and numerical calculations using CFX5.7 for the water pool and cooling pipe were performed to investigate the heat transfer characteristics and evaluate the heat transfer coefficient model of the MARS-GCR (Multi-dimensional Analysis of Reactor Safety for Gas Cooled Reactor Analysis) which was developed for the safety analysis of the gas cooled reactor. From the results of the experiments and CFX calculations, heat transfer coefficients inside the cooling pipe were calculated and those were used for the assessment for the heat transfer coefficient model of the MARS-GCR.

Thermal hydraulic challenges of Gas Cooled Fast Reactors with passive safety features

2009 ◽  
Vol 239 (5) ◽  
pp. 840-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Pope ◽  
Jeong Ik Lee ◽  
Pavel Hejzlar ◽  
Michael J. Driscoll
Keyword(s):  
Passive Safety ◽  
Fast Reactors ◽  
Safety Features
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document